The Canadian Human Rights Commission, supports the principle of equal opportunity and helps keeps a society free from discrimination. The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) develops through research, the (CHRC) protects human rights through a fair and an effective complaints process; and it represents the public interest to have better and fair rights for all Canadians. The Canadian Human Rights Commission consists of up to a maximum of 8 commissioners that are appointed by the governor in council, including a chief commissioner with deputy minister status and a staff of approximately 170 in offices throughout the country. I think the CHRC research, help improve Canada government in a way because they have this organization who listen to people in a way by receiving complaints, and doing something about it which shows Canada government listen to the people. Most governments would avoid a situation, but this could help also build Canada …show more content…
Before the Charter even existed, freedoms and rights were protected in Canada by several laws. One of the several laws that protected freedoms and rights, was the 1960 Bill of Rights. Although more important, none of these laws were part of the Constitution (The Constitution is a document that was signed in 1982 by the Queen (Elizabeth) and Canada’s famous Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, signed the Constitution Act, 1982, which includes the British North America Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms) and therefore lacked the power and durability of the Charter. The Bill of Rights also only applied to federal, rather than provincial laws. Early 1980s, Pierre Trudeau, Liberal government started to begin the process of patriating Canada's Constitution—taking it out of the hands of the British Parliament; the government also decided to include within the Constitution a new Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Along with the extensive constitutional debates, that then dominated politics for much of 1981 and 1982, there were specific concerns about the Charter: would it give courts and judges too much power to interpret its meaning, and how would it be altered once it was in place? There were also deep reservations among provincial leaders that a Charter would restrict the right of provinces to independently make