Preview

The Categories of Aristotle

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Categories of Aristotle
SPIRITAN SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY ISIENU-NUSKKA
AN AFFILIATE OF
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA NSUKKA

TOPIC
THE CATEGORIES OF ARISTOTLE

COURSE
INTRODUCTION TO METAPHYSICS 1

NAME
MABKWE NICHOLAS CHUKWUNWEIKE
REG. NO 09/UN/SI/A/0826

LECTURER
REV. FR. DR. B. ABANUKA C.S.Sp.

DATE JANUARY 2011

INTRODUCTION
Aristotle (384-322BC) is one of the most influential philosophers of the western tradition and had many philosophical works credited to him. In his treatise on logic collectively known as “Organon”, Aristotle gave two preliminary treatises; “The Categories and De Interpretatione (on interpretation) dealing with terms and with propositions respectively. This paper is an attempt to look at the categories from Aristotle’s perspective. Hence it is necessary to define the term category (ies) from a general point of view first, so as to create enabling environment to delve into the categories of Aristotle.
THE TERM CATEGORY (IES) In singular form, category according to Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary is a class or group of people or things regarded as having certain features in common. Etymologically, the word itself is derived from the Greek word “Kategorein” which has the meaning of “predicate”. Thus, the categories signify different ways of predicating something or better still, different modes of existence. The exact same meaning is also found in the Latin interpretation “praedicamenta” from the verb “praedicare” meaning to assert.
ARISTOTLE’S CATEGORIES Aristotle’s categories is a singularly important work of philosophy, which not only presents the backbone of Aristotle’s own philosophical theorizing, but has exerted an unparalleled influence on the systems of many of the greatest philosophers in the western tradition. The set of doctrines in the categories provides the frame work of inquiry for a wide variety of Aristotle’s philosophical investigations, ranging from his discussions of time and change in the physics, to the science of



Bibliography: BRUGGER, W. & BAKER, K.: “Categories” in Philosophical Dictionary. New York: Drams associates Inc., 1966, 51-55. FLEW, A.: “Aristotle,” in The Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Pan Book, 1984, 160-163. HALVERSON, W.A.: Concise Introduction to Philosophy; 2nd Edition. New York: Random House, 1967. OZUMBA, G.O.: A Concise Introduction to Epistemology. Calabar: Ebenezer Printing Press & Computer Service, 2001. SPANGLER M.: Logic; an Aristotelian Approach, rev. ed. Maryland: University Press of America Inc., 1993. STUMPF, S.E.: Philosophy; History & Problem. North America: McGraw-Hill Inc. 1994.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To formulate a conclusion of Aristotle’s taxonomy method is in some regards quite difficult. The philosopher passed on 2,331 years ago; consequently, he cannot continue to defend his method against modern methods and science. No one can fully understand another person’s thought process and therefore we cannot make assumptions regarding a philosopher’s methods. Yet, if there is a desire, whether out of necessity or pure casual interest, to understand the development of modern science one must look at and analyze the ideas and beliefs of the first scientists: philosophers or others, to the best of our ability. Whether modern science confirms it or disputes it, all modern conclusions, and scientific philosophies, have been influenced by those earliest thinkers.…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes took an extreme skeptical position by asking, “What is impossible to doubt, even when trying to believe that everything is false?” His answer was: "I think, therefore I am"; which is Descartes ' most famous one-liner and is the one that explains his understanding of the dualism argument. The term ‘dualism’ has a variety of uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that, for some particular domain, there are two fundamental kinds or categories of things or principles. In the philosophy of mind, dualism is the theory that the mental and the physical or mind and body are, in some sense, radically different kinds of thing. The main discussion about dualism tends to start from the assumption of the reality of a physical world, and then ways of considering arguments for why the mind cannot be treated as simply part of that physical world. According to substance dualism, our minds and our bodies are two distinct substances capable of existing apart. Descartes substance dualism was based in the belief that the universe consisted of two different kinds of substances that he called res extensa (physical things) and res cogitans (thinking things). In other words, the essence of mind is thought while the essence of body is extension. This belief also leads to his assumption that Free Will is self-evident. In other words, if one is capable of doubting the existence of things learned through experience even when some of these may be true, then it is obvious that we have the freedom to disbelieve, thus free will.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who was fascinated by the physical world around him which he wanted to understand and explain. Aristotle highly admired his tutor Plato; however he dismissed his theories about the alternative world of forms and the true form of objects. Instead he tried to explain why things exist as they do in the real world. Aristotle believed we can only know a thing fully when all its causes of existence are understood. So he explored how things come into existence and tried to analyse how we identify objects. He realized that the human brain automatically categorizes everything based on its matter, shape, creator and purpose, in order to identify its common name. Aristotle developed this idea further and proposed the theory of the four causes; which explain why a thing exists as it does. He called these the material, formal, efficient and final causes.…

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the 17th and 18th century two philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God, existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category of either Rationalist or Imperialist. The Plutonian philosophers to be discussed will include Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. And the Aristotelian philosophers will include Locke, Berkeley and Hume.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle made significantly valiant contributions to the fields of science, philosophy, and ethics, inspiring others to use his finding for future discoveries. With the dedication to resolve previously unsolvable problems, Aristotle questioned ancient discoveries and was well known for his powerful lectures and debates. Being the first to develop a formalized system of reason,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Final Cause

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay I will begin by extracting the arguments from the extract, outlining Aristotle’s explanation of the four ‘causes’ and arguing why Aristotle has reasons for believing this. In order to achieve a considered and…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” This just one of Aristotle’s famous quotes and is probably the most important of them all. Excellence isn’t an act it’s just a habit something you just do without thinking about the thing you’re excellent at. In the Leaving a Legacy unit, many social and historical movements, as well as people and legacies, have been explored. Some of these people are still going on or have left a legacy worth learning about, one of which is Aristotle. Aristotle is a Greek philosopher who is the icon of western philosophy who started out as a student of Plato to one of the most iconic philosophers ever.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a student of Plato’s and teacher of Alexander the Great. He created his own school in 335 B.C. in Athens. He thought of metaphysics to be the first philosophy which formed a part of Aristotle’s interests. Aristotle’s stated that forms are universal. He created main ideas that included categories of reason, syllogism, conceptualism, accidental vs. essential properties, the four causes, hierarchy of being, the unmoved mover and types of reasoning/knowledge. According to Aristotle, notion of Essential properties makes something what it is, and accidental properties are the differences of that item. For example, there are many different types of paper, there are small, big, pink, black, white, yellow etc. but they are still considered paper and this is what it makes it an accidental property. Aristotle’s believed that each thing is maintained of a mixture of both matter and form. By forms he meant essential conception of a thing and its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyzing Aristotle

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) The soul and the body are different forms. While the body is visible and mortal, the soul is invisible and immortal. He suggests that although the body dies and decays, the soul continues to exist. I do believe there is life after death, everyone must eventually die, and it cannot be avoided. However, even though death is a fact of life, it is a topic that many people prefer not to talk about. This avoidance of discussion is usually due to the denial of one’s own death and the denial is usually due to fear. The fear is, for many people, a fear of the unknown. In my opinion i believe that when humans die, the body and the brain dies, but the mind still exists and it creates our afterlife according to our own beliefs and expectations. If a person believes there in nothing after death then there will not be a dream, it will be as if the person is asleep forever without dreaming.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The statement argues that Aristotle’s theory of the four causes is impossible to apply to everyday life and cannot be applied to the real world. Aristotle believed there are four causes that determine what things are and their purpose and claims this is how we differentiate one thing from another. These four causes are known as the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and most importantly for Aristotle, the final cause, and these together describe how ‘things’ transform from the state of actuality to potentiality. To some extent the theory of the four causes could be accurate and plausible, however, some of the ideas behind it is flawed and unrealistic. In this essay I will cover the three main faults of Aristotle’s theory. Namely, its lack of clarity, that the theory is based on assumptions and that there is no evidence to support the existence of the prime mover.…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Shakespeare’s plays Othello and Macbeth the audience is presented with two great heroes who both poses a certain character flaw that inevitably leads to their downfall. This is the idea behind a tragic hero; a person of great importance comes to a tragic end because of a serious flaw in his character. Both Othello and Macbeth find themselves on top of the world one moment and being crushed beneath it the next. The next logical comparison to make between two of Shakespeare’s tragic heroes is who is more tragic, who fits the design of the tragic hero more closely, Othello or Macbeth.…

    • 2452 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays