Preview

Plato and Aristotle Views on Forms

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
434 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato and Aristotle Views on Forms
The views of Plato and Aristotle are different but to some extent similar. Plato was mostly known for Theory of Forms and Aristotle was basically known for his thoughts in metaphysics. Even though they both thought a bit differently they did agree in a few things, for instance, Plato and Aristotle not only impacted social life in the past but the future, in fact some still use it in today’s society.
Plato was a student of Socrate’s. He founded the first University called Academy in the year 387 B.C. Plato’s most and best known account is Theory of Forms. He proposed that what is truly real is not the objects we encounter in our sensory experience but relatively forms, which can only be obtained logically. Plato’s theory of forms included allegory of the cave, divided line, platonic forms, platonic realism, division of the soul, philosopher king and memories of the soul. Plato stated that only forms are truly real but is something that cannot be described as an object; however it can be described as a sensory experience.
Aristotle was a student of Plato’s and teacher of Alexander the Great. He created his own school in 335 B.C. in Athens. He thought of metaphysics to be the first philosophy which formed a part of Aristotle’s interests. Aristotle’s stated that forms are universal. He created main ideas that included categories of reason, syllogism, conceptualism, accidental vs. essential properties, the four causes, hierarchy of being, the unmoved mover and types of reasoning/knowledge. According to Aristotle, notion of Essential properties makes something what it is, and accidental properties are the differences of that item. For example, there are many different types of paper, there are small, big, pink, black, white, yellow etc. but they are still considered paper and this is what it makes it an accidental property. Aristotle’s believed that each thing is maintained of a mixture of both matter and form. By forms he meant essential conception of a thing and its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The young man who would eventually be called Plato, by his gymnasium classmates due to his muscular build, started off as a student of the gadfly of Athens, Socrates. Plato was deeply devoted to his master Socrates, even attending the event of his death, drinking the poison hemlock After his master’s death, Plato went on to build upon his masters teaching to the point, where both philosopher’s teaching is…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before going further into the Forms, knowing more about Plato’s perspective of the world is imperative. The simplest way to describe this is by saying Plato believes instead of one world, two worlds exist. Plato also believes things…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Plato would argue that everything we see and touch is only partially real; they are replicas of the true actuality. On the other hand, justice, courage, moderation, wisdom, and beauty are true realities for Plato. He calls these the Forms. They are not visible to the senses, but by overcoming bodily desires, the mind can straightforwardly perceive these real truths. Plato nearly teaches…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Socrates

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Creation, the beginning process of life either given from God, or an actual "higher form" which was Plato's idea, or passed through from evolution, from which Aristotle sided with is one example of their differences. Plato's idea that the creator, was a God, the all powerful who created the Earth, the universe, ECT, Aristotle would not believe in such a thing, because in his way of thinking, he does not encourage something that isn't visual to him. Substance, matter, substratum, plain black and white evidence of something in the only convincing barrier for Aristotle's mind to handle, whereas Plato trusted quite the opposite.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato’s notion of the Forms comes to us as an answer. In Phaedo, Socrates is prisoned and put to death, which ought to be a tragedy and naturally a fearful experience for most. Strikingly, Socrates is open to being executed, which begs the question of why? Socrates believes that the body and the soul are separate entities that are combined to create what we see on earth as life.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The passage from 72e to 77a in Plato’s Phaedo contains Plato’s argument for the idea that the soul exists before birth. This argument relies heavily on Plato’s Theory of Forms. For Plato, the sensory, material world is full of impermanence, instability, contradiction, and illusion. Therefore, Plato says, for knowledge to be possible, there must be a realm of objects, namely “Forms”, which exist outside of the spatiotemporal realm, and which mediate our knowledge of the sensory world. These Forms are more real than objects in the sensory realm, and they are permanent, stable, unchanging.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato believed that a human was comprised of a body, which is physical, and a soul, which is spiritual. His ideas on the subject, although not originally his, became the first fully developed ideas in Western Philosophy of human beings consisting of two parts.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato was from the time of approximately 400BC and stated that the human body with all its parts must owe it’s origin to a creator. Plato was a Pagan and believed in numerous Greek gods. In his work The Timaeus he suggests that a cosmic craftsman (‘the Demiurge’) may have brought together the materials of the universe to make it orderly and beautiful. Plato’s theory of forms (or ideas) lies at the heart of his philosophy. It follows on directly from his allegory of the cave and understanding reality. This theory suggests that a realm of forms exist, perfect ideals of which things in this world are but imperfect. The world that we see around us, according to this theory, is but a pale shadow of the ultimate reality. Things may appear beautiful, or just, insofar as they imitate the form of Beauty and Justice. But the imperfect and changeable world cannot capture the glory of the eternal and immutable…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Plato's World of Forms is part of his philosophy that helps one to understand the way that things exist in this material world; through this World of Forms, one is compelled to realize that objects are not always the way they appear to be in the material world, but in the World of Forms they are in their essential forms.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato “diminished the reality of the material world observed by the senses.” For Plato reality can be obtained in the “eternal forms,” and are reliant on “nothing else for their existence.” Objects in the practical world get their characteristics and “their very being from the forms,” that “sensible objects” only live “dependently” (Barnes 46). He states that forms are the reality, the ideas that live in the outer material world and the senses are an illusion, which is the mathematical approach. While Aristotle disagrees with this, he believes that “they must exist fully and independently” and they are “what make up the real world” (Barnes 46) pertaining to “sensible objects.”…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I think there is more to know and learn about him than any other philosopher that I have been exposed to. I knew of his theory of forms before and his virtue of golden mean, but I had never heard of is concept of his causes, which are like the basis of his physics. I think that Aristotle was the closest to actually creating an idea that people could just follow without being extremely radical. His concepts seemed very general. For instance, if starting today I tried to live by Aristotle’s way of thinking I think I could pretty much do it. I already practice the virtue of golden mean when I eat. I don’t want to eat too much, but I don’t want to starve either. Also I think that I believe in his four causes, they all make sense to me. There is obviously something that brought me into this word, I am made up of material, I do have the same basic form as a European human because I am human and I do believe I have a purpose. Also I agree with Aristotle that each person poses a soul within them. I am religious, and Plato’s theory seemed to be more religious than Aristotle’s, but seem to agree with Aristotle on the soul issue. One thing I wish I knew about Aristotle was if his father’s occupation inspired him to look at life through the scientific eye. All throughout school we had to classify and observe and I really find it interesting that the idea of that came from Aristotle during BCE. Another thing that I do which is inspired by Aristotle…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's theory of Forms

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page

    Plato's Theory of Forms are defined as the objects or "things" we believe to see in which are not physically there, but in the form in which they are perceived. These Forms described in Plato's theory are only intellectually comprehended not physically. To Plato, nothing that is physical can be "Perfect," perfect only exists in theory. But these Forms are not Ideas, simply because these forms existed before anyone was around to imagine these things. There were always "things" in shapes, or beautiful things, or quanities of things before there were people having ideas or giving names to these things. Plato was aware of the physical sense of things, but believed they had a lesser reality because they can always approximate their form and are always to some extent flawed.…

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Aristotle Dialogue

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As I was at Plato’s Academy, I overhear an argument between Plato and Aristotle. The two were in an intensive argument over the theory of forms and the theory of knowledge. As I listened, I noticed that the two had extremely different viewpoints on the issues, but both men had compelling arguments. The first heated discussion was on the theory of knowledge.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays