Preview

The Criminal Trial Process

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1996 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Criminal Trial Process
The Criminal Trial
Process

The Sixth Amendment specifies certain citizens ' rights that apply in all criminal trials. These rights are speedy trial, public trial, trial by jury, notice of the accusation, confrontation of opposing witnesses, compulsory process for obtaining favorable witnesses and assistance of counsel. Although the Sixth Amendment guarantees these rights only with respect to the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court has incorporated all of them so they apply to the states as well as the federal government. The many legal procedures associated with modern criminal trials have developed over centuries. States and the federal government follow a largely uniform set of procedures.
…show more content…
Based on the investigation, police or the sheriff may decide that: a crime has not occurred as defined under state law, there is insufficient evidence to pursue the complaint, or one or more persons may be arrested and the matter referred to the prosecutor. Any person arrested must be released within 24 hours unless a warrant is issued for an arrest (NOLO, 2012).
2. Initial Appearance.
This must occur within 24 hours of arrest. At this appearance, the charges are read and the judge makes sure the defendant understands his/her rights. Judge makes sure the defendant has an attorney if he/she qualifies for legal assistance. The judge also sets the date for the next step, the preliminary hearing at this time. Judge sets bail, if no bail amount was named in arrest warrant. If the case is a domestic violence one, judge will order no contact order.
3. Preliminary
…show more content…
If the jury produces a guilty verdict, the defense often makes post-trial motions requesting the judge to override the jury and either grant a new trial or acquit the defendant. Almost always, the judge denies the defense post-trial motions.
12. Sentencing.
If the verdict is not guilty this end the steps for criminal trial process. If the verdict is guilty, the Judge imposes sentence. He is guided by sentencing guidelines but does have some leeway depending on mitigating circumstances (first time offense consideration, etc.). If the defense appeals the court decision the process is as follow:
• After sentencing, losing party files appeal (in criminal cases, only the defendant can file an appeal because of double jeopardy rules)
• Trial court clerk notifies other parties and Appellate Division.
• Trial court record is submitted to Appellate Division.
• Both appellant and respondent submit written briefs presenting their legal arguments
• Case is placed on calendar and assigned to a panel of three Appellate Division judges.
• Panel of judges reviews trial court records, written briefs, and applicable law and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    preliminary hearing is held and the magistrate decides if there is probable cause to believe that the…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I attended two waivers of indictment, arraignment and change of plea cases. The cases involved the U.S. versus Hakob Sergoyan and the U.S. versus Stanislav Sarber. They both where tried for the same crime, and ended up presenting themselves to the Judge at the same time, but with different attorneys. In their arraignment, the judge went over their rights and the different things they may do to defend themselves. Shortly after the prosecutor went over their charges and some of the facts to the case. In the end, they both made guilty pleas. The judge then asked the prosecutor whether to remand the case or keep the defendants out of custody until there trial. The prosecutor in due course decided to keep them out of custody until there next trial.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The seventh step is postverdict motions. This is where the defense can file motions in behalf of the defendant. The defense can argue that the jurors could not have possible found the defendant guilty from the evidence…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    FBI take action by identifying and apprehending the suspect. Apprehending may be done immediately upon reports, or after thorough investigation have been carried out. After the arrest, the suspect is then accused to a prosecutor who decides whether the accusations are within the court’s jurisdiction or not. In case the suspect is charged with the criminal acts, he/she is taken before a judge for a pre-trial to determine whether there is probable cause that a crime was committed in a preliminary hearing.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ky Court System Structure

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court has 7 members that work on the appeal by right felony, appeal by permission criminal, exclusive death penalty and writ application cases (The National Center for State Courts, 2001). The appeal by right felony cases include those that are over a 20 year sentence, and workman's compensation. The appeals by permission criminal cases include civil and administrative agency.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every case starts with an alleged crime. In the Sandoval case, the crime was murder. Sandoval was soon put into the system after he was arrested. After the arrest, Sandoval would have been book and then gone to his first appearance hearing where he is informed that he was getting charged with first-degree murder. Next would be the preliminary hearing where the defense would have received an arraignment, formally charging the suspect of the crime and asking what his plea is. Some states do not have a preliminary hearing system so they would use a grand jury system. The defendant can plea guilty, not guilty or no contest. The prosecution must establish probable cause to the judge by showing that a crime occurred and that the accused cause that…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Carl Lee Jury Trial

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There is a thing known as a jury trial process that is supposed to happen in every jury trial case. Although, not followed perfectly in the jury trial of Carl Lee it is followed pretty well for a movie. The jury trial process is as follows; a crime is commited, an investigation is conducted, a warrant is issued, then the arrest is made, once arrested the criminal is booked, then they have their bail hearing. Following the bail hearing the preliminary arraignment happens these are when the informal charges are presented, after that comes the preliminary hearing this is where the court reviews the evidence to make sure there is enough evidence for a case to occur. If there is enough evidence they move on to the formal indictment where the…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam review

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury or judge has to find the person guilty of the crime and that the jury has no reasonable doubt the defendant is guilty…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Critical Justice Process series videos I learned a lot about how the process of being arrested works. Before I watched the videos I knew a little bit of the process but not exactly how everything worked. The first video on the process of arrest, I learned from one of the officers was that, “when we take someone into custody we don’t always advise them of their rights unless we need a confession out of them”. I also learned that there’s a few steps for a defendant to get a court date, before this video I thought that when a person is arrested they go and get booked, then see a…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The criminal defense process begins with the lawyer regularly and consistently being in court to defend and assist the…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criminal trial process aims to provide justice for all those involved, while it succeeds in the majority of cases, it effectiveness is influenced and reduced by certain factors. These include the legal representation involved in a case and the availability of legal aid, the capacity of the jury assessing the trial, the credibility of scientific evidence and the impact of social media on the trial process. Due to such flaws the criminal trial process is not always an effective means of achieving justice.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Once an arrest is made, and the defendant is going to court. The courts must recognize if the evidence that was seized was…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grand jury paper

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper will discuss and explain the pretrial process and also look into the following associated activities. Discuss pretrial detention and the concept of bail-…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Trial Discussion

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first step in a criminal case is a court appearance called an arraignment, in which the charges against the defendant are read before a judge. At an arraignment, a lawyer is appointed if the defendant cannot afford one, and the defendant's plea (guilty, not guilty, no contest) is entered. Bail may also be set at the arraignment.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal Process

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages

    October 26, 2014 Appeal Process Paper When any defendant is found guilty, of any charge, is entitled to an appeal to at least one level of appellate court (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). An appeal is when a defendant has already been found guilty in court, and they decide to take it to a higher court in order to change the ruling (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). Basically it is a process that takes place, because the defendant and their attorney do not feel that the verdict given was accurate and that could be due to many different reasons. Appeals ensure that there was a fair trial given and no rights were violated (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). The appeal process begins very shortly after the trial, when the defense sends an appeal to the court. Appeals factor in to the overall criminal justice process, because in the end they can change laws or amendments. The Miranda rights are a great example of this. They came about after someone went back and challenged the court. It was then that the Miranda rights became part of the law and the criminal justice process. Just because a criminal goes to court and is decided guilty and is charged with whatever he/she was being charged with, does not mean that the process is over and he/she accepts the sentence and it is done. The defendant may decide something went wrong or he/she has a way of proving their innocence. Then they will submit an appeal and may ended up getting out of the original sentence given. This completely changes up the criminal procedures and processes. Based on my review of the appeal courts results in New Jersey, I think that the current appeals process is very effective. As per New Jersey Judiciary annual Report 2011- 2012 (n.d.), 6,461 appeals were received and 6,159 of those appeals have been decided. (Appellate Division of Superior Court). Mostly everyone appeal submitted to the New Jersey Appellate Courts has been resolved, therefore showing that the defendants are given a chance to have their case heard once…

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics