Preview

Carl Lee Jury Trial

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1632 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Carl Lee Jury Trial
There is a thing known as a jury trial process that is supposed to happen in every jury trial case. Although, not followed perfectly in the jury trial of Carl Lee it is followed pretty well for a movie. The jury trial process is as follows; a crime is commited, an investigation is conducted, a warrant is issued, then the arrest is made, once arrested the criminal is booked, then they have their bail hearing. Following the bail hearing the preliminary arraignment happens these are when the informal charges are presented, after that comes the preliminary hearing this is where the court reviews the evidence to make sure there is enough evidence for a case to occur. If there is enough evidence they move on to the formal indictment where the …show more content…
Cobb, one of the victim's mom, she says he was 23 when he was killed and she saw him die. As for the defense they attempt to ask her how many people her son raped or kidnapped in the 23 years he was alive. The judge instructs her not to answer that question and the prosecution's objection is accepted, the jury is also told to disregard the last question. The second witness is Sheriff Walls who is black, which is important because blacks tend to help out other blacks as you’ll see. Prosecution just asks the sheriff to I.D. the murder weapon and to tell whether or not the prints matched the prints of Lee and they did. Next, the defense asks the sheriff arrested Cobb before the murder and he said yes for rape and attempted murder. The rednecks also signed a paper saying that they did do both of those things which the sheriff was not supposed to say yes to, but he did. The jury was instructed by the judge to disregard, but that’s hard to do once he said yes. The third witness is Deputy Looney who was shot by Lee in his act of killing the rednecks. Prosecution questions first asking if he was present at the shooting he says yes, he then asks him how he was shot and he answers by saying I think a bullet bounced off the ground and hit me. They ask him is he got a clear shot at the shooter and the Deputy says no I did not, but that Lee went and apologized to him in the hospital basically admitting it was him. Now it's the defense's turn they ask him if he …show more content…
The prosecution's is boring and they say no one has the right to kill someone, the defense could provide one person to say Carl Lee Hayley was insane and he was a convicted felon. Then comes jakes; He starts by apologizing for his little experience ands says to decide with your heart. He proceeds to tell them a story; “Close your eyes. Imagine a little girl walking home from the grocery store when two men pull over in a truck and snatch her up, tie her up, and rip her clothes from her body one after another repeatedly raping her. Then, when they are done use her for target practice tearing all of her flesh to the bones, urinate on her, then comes the hanging. The branch is too weak and she falls back to the earth. They pick her up take her to Foggy Creek bridge and throw her off the edge, falling 30 feet she hits the bottom. Broken body soaked in their urine, their semine, and her blood. Now picture this little girl white.” This closing statement wins the case for them and Carl Lee is innocent due to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Petrocelli is the prosecuting lawyer and is good. She is pushing for the death penalty. She states that everyone involved in the crime is equally guilty including the one who wrestled for the gun, the robber and the two lookouts. She is trying to prove that Steve knew and associated with the two robbers who are bad characters. He was a lookout for them. Two men, James King and "Bobo" Evans entered a drugstore. They were to rob the owner, Mr. Nesbitt. Little did they know Mr. Nesbitt had a licensed gun. There was a struggle and Mr. Nesbitt was shot dead. There was a woman in the store at the time of the crime and…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecutor in charge was Doug Gansler, Muhammad waived his right to counsel and decided to represent himself, soon after giving his opening statement he requested his right to counsel. The prosecution decided to bring up charges including murder, conspiracy, terrorism, conspiracy, and illegal use of a firearm (Clark Prosecutor). The evidence the prosecution provided included more than 130 eye witnesses and 400 pieces of evidence that shows that Muhammad made Malvo commit the shootings. The defense argued to drop the capital punishment charge on Muhammad for lack of evidence that Muhammad pulled the trigger because the finger prints that were on the rifle belonged to Malvo. Muhammad argued that because he did not pull the trigger that killed Dean Meyer, then moved to remove the death penalty charges.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sixth step is jury deliberations and verdict. This step is to remind the jurors of the laws. Each juror is to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty on each charge. There may be only one charge, but there can be more. If there is five charges against the defendant then the jurors have to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty on each charge. They all have to explain why or why not they feel the defendant is guilty on each charge.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The jury deliberated for less than an hour before acquitting Butler. This was a case that was all over the media and from the start had people thinking he had done it. While watching the video in class, it had me really thinking. I simply did not believe anything the prosecutors were saying. Nothing was making sense to me, the confession, and the eye witness. I just did not think that Brenton Butler had killed 65 year old Mary Ann Stephens.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biased testimony towards the defendant resulted in a prejudice jury. Very frequently, statements like ‘We heard the facts, didn’t we?’ or ‘Pay attention to the facts’ are expressed in the jury room. The 4th Juror cited that the murder weapon was a knife so unique that ‘the storekeeper who sold it to him identified the knife in court and said it was the only one of its kind he ever had in stock.’ The 8th Juror argues that ‘It’s possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife.’ None of the Juror’s believes this possibility as they have already established their prejudices against the accused. The 10th Juror says ‘Let’s talk facts. These people are born to lie… They think different. They act different.’ These are not ‘facts’ but prejudice opinions made by the 10th Juror about the socio-economic status of the boy. It can assumed that the ‘facts’ presented in this case can be viewed as biased opinions and reports that impairs the true facts.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the prosecution holds the burden of proof, they go first. When the prosecution examines a witness, they ask a chain of questions that that emphasize the elements of the crime and establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt. For the Sandoval case, their goals were to prove that he went back to the scene of the crime with intent to harm or kill, that he was capable of killing and that he did kill the victim. When Sandoval did take the stand, he was forced to answer questions that showed that he had no real reason to go back unless it was motivated through revenge and gave reasons why he would want to get revenge. I think a really effective witness was the paramedic that treated the victim. I thought it was a nice use of the witness because he mentioned details on the stabbing which brought to light that the victim appeared to have more offensive wounds. A strong point was made when the prosecutor mentioned that if it were a self-defense altercation then the victim would most likely have slash-like wounds instead of stab-like wounds. By far I think the worst witness for the prosecution would have been Officer Gassman. He did not submit adequate reports which I believe had a significant impact on the case. With respect to the prosecutions examinations, the defense got to cross-examine the witnesses. His goal was to show that the…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4)The old man and the lady say that they heard the boy screaming at his father saying "I'll kill you" but that doesn't really mean he actually killed him since people say that phrase all the time but don't really mean it and that was proved when juror number three has and outburst and say's "I'll kill you" to juror number eight.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the song, it had all been decided before hand. The District Attorney (D.A.) was “[practicing] all his lines in the mirror.” He knew what the outcome was going to be, and so did everybody else. They must’ve all “read the morning paper, The headline [read] “the man hangs” but the jury doesn’t.” The D.A. doesn’t have to say anything to convince the jury over- a hung jury is an undecided jury-they agree with what the newspaper says. The man is already hung. Just like in TKAM, Tom Robinson had no chance to win. But even if some of the jury isn’t convinced-Mr. Cunningham-the Prosecutor can just “pay to close it like a casket.” Even the witness is payed off he is, “Too well dressed for the witness stand” AKA he just got new clothes. Hmm, maybe a new paycheck?? The defendant has no chance, he either “[Hangs] on a rope, or bated breath.” The death penalty will be served, or the suspense will end him. Game over. To add to the injustice of this case “The press prays for whichever headline is worse.” The accused has nothing going for him. The jury, either they get payed to vote against him, or they agree with the Prosecutor. The witness already got payed off to say the ‘right’ thing; and the press just doesn’t care-unless it will help them sell papers. That dude couldn’t catch a break. The 5 minorities arrested had DNA proof-DNA that is I believe 100% accurate, they were innocent and no amount of arguing could prove it another way-yet they still were convicted. Tom Robinson had the 1930’s version of DNA proof, yet he stood no chance at being…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the movie, Tonya Hailey is raped by two men named Billy Ray Cobb and James Willard. As the movie progresses, Billy and James were about to go into a hearing until Carl Lee comes out of a room and kills them both. It is logical that when someone is murdered and the murderer is caught, they end up losing everything they have and go to prison. In this case, Carl Lee was proven innocent and was defending his family, especially Tonya, that is why he killed those two men. If Jake did not help prove him innocent, his life would have been at stake. He faced a challenge about murdering those two men, but it was all his choice for the safety of everyone else in Canton. He fought with courage by defending his daughter and the rights for her to walk around safely, with two less rapists in the…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defendant claimed that the eye witness evidence was enough, but there is no real physical proof. No blood on the boy, no fingerprints, nothing. There is only circumstantial evidence, which even that is plausible. The boy very well could have been, and was, at the movie theater. They also claim he had a motive, but even if he did he was not the only one. The boy’s father was a rude, insensitive man. He got into bar fights often. Any number of people could have wanted to kill him. (Rose 24, 16)…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are six steps in the trial process; these steps include jury selection, opening statements, evidence presentation, closing arguments, charging of the jury and deliberation of jury. Throughout this six step process, it is vital that the rights of all parties involved and respected and protected by following due process. This is especially vital to the defendant in each case since he/she has the most to lose.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    O.J. Simpson Murder Trial

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There was an abundance of evidence recovered by police and the prosecuting attorney that really makes you think about how in the world this man was set free. For instance, there was a bloody shoe found around the crime scene but not just any shoe, it was a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, a relatively rare Italian-made model. It just so happens that O.J. Simpson wears a size 12. It also happens to be a coincidence that, according to the prosecuting attorney, O.J. Shopped at this particular store that often sold this brand of shoe.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have all gathered here today to bring justice to a poor old man, who was murdered in his own house. Everyone in the court was brought here to decide if this man is guilty of being insane or guilty of murder. The murder confused to stocking this old man and claimed that he killed him because of his eye. The murders cut of all his limbs after killing him and hide him under the floorboard. When police came to his house he confused after a few minutes of silence. After a few days, lawyers, jurors, a judge, an expert, a witness, the murder, and I have all gathered here to bring justice to this old man. From my point of view, as the documenter, this trail seems like a tough decision. As of now I feel like the murder is guilty of 1st degree murder. Now at 1:44 PM the prosecution lawyer begins.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The selection of a jury is the process that occurs right before the actual trial, and after the trial initiation and the arraignment and plea. Only about 10 percent of actual arraignments see an actual trial, because 90 percent of cases that are preparing for trial end up accepting a plea bargain (Schmalleher, 2009).…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics