Preview

THE DEATH

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
THE DEATH
MANILA, Philippines—Alarmed by the influx of heinous crimes, Senator Vicente “Tito” Sotto III has sought the revival of Republic Act 7659 or the Death Penalty Law in the country through lethal injection.
In filing Senate Bill 2080 known as “An Act imposing death penalty in the Philippines,” Sotto sought to repeal Republic Act No. 9346 otherwise known as “An act prohibiting the imposition of Death Penalty in the Philippines…”
“The influx of heinous crimes committed poses an alarming situation in the country nowadays,” he said in his explanatory note in the bill.
“The indiscriminate and horrendous brutality happening everywhere rightfully and justifiably compels the government to resort to the ultimate criminal penalty provided for by no less than our constitution- the death penalty. The imposition of life imprisonment proves to be a non-deterrent against criminality,” said Sotto.
This was consistent , he said, with the rationale of R.A. 7659 or the Death Penalty Law, which provides that death penalty is appropriately necessary “due to the alarming upsurge of such crimes which has resulted not only in the loss of human lives and wanton destruction of property but also affected the nation’s efforts towards sustainable economic development and prosperity while at the same time has undermined the people’s faith in the Government and the latter’s ability to maintain peace and order in the country.”
In his bill, Sotto proposed that death penalty be imposed for heinous crimes specified under the Death Penalty law and all other laws, executive orders and decrees imposing death penalty.
“Republic Act No. 7659 is thus hereby revived,” said the bill.
“The imposed penalty of death shall be carried out through lethal injection. Republic Act No. 8177 otherwise known as the Act Designating Death by Lethal Injection is thus hereby revived and activated,” it further said.

Source:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thump… The mouth starts to gurgle, as fluid starts to erupt. This is the sound of death. I believe that the death penalty is nothing but a true reflection of how, even though we think we have revolutionized and developed, the impact is not as profound. We are still blinded by our animal instincts. In addition, ‘an eye for an eye only ends up making the world blind’-Mahatma Ghandi, killing each other is not only inhumane,but rather provokes more killing. Harris’ death penalty was the first in 25 years in the state of California, which logically, resulted in the comfort and aggravation in using the death…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proposition 34

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Proposition 34, titled by election officials as ' 'Death Penalty. Initiative Statute ' ' is on the November 6, 2012 ballot in California as an initiated state statute. If the state 's voters approve it, proposition 34 will eliminate the death penalty in California and replace it with life in prison without the possibility of parole. To be more exact the proposition will repeal the death penalty as maximum punishment for persons found guilty of murder and replace it with the imprisonment without the possibility of parole. It will also apply retroactively to persons currently sentenced to death. It will require persons found guilty of murder to work while in prison, with their wages to be applied to any victim restitution fines or orders against them. If the proposition gets approved it will also create a $100 million fund to be distributed to law enforcement agencies to help solve more homicide and rape cases.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas and the Death Penalty

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Putting people to death for breaking the law is a punishment that has been in existence for thousands of years of human history and has been enforced in all corners of the world by different societies. Capital punishment has become a very controversial subject that is widely accepted by some people and harshly protested by others especially in today’s American society where differences in opinion about subjects such as this are as broad and complicated as the legal information and research information that has been published about it. This is also one of those subjects where it is impossible, because of these differences for there to be any sort of universal agreement among law makers, law breakers, conforming citizens, communities and societies because it involves punishment by the decision of taking or sparing of a human life.…

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lethal Injection

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Executing condemned prisoners by lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment and should not be legal. Lethal injections are the most common procedure of capital punishment in the United States today, but it does not mean that it is the most civilized. Several states use the three-drug protocol, with sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide, and potassium. The other method is by injecting a large dose of barbiturate. Several problems can occur with these methods and cause excoriating pain and torcher. Physicians stand under the Hippocratic’s Oath to save people lives, not to kill them, often inexperienced technicians and orderlies carried out the injections of the drugs. It is cruel and inhumane to let untrained workers administer drugs to the prisoners when the result could in up badly. There are too many what ifs in this procedures and risk. Just because prisoners take a life does not mean we should.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The foremost reason being given for the imposition of capital punishment is its power to deter crimes. The argument says that if heinous crimes are punishable by death, would-be perpetrators of such crimes would protect their lives and they will not commit heinous crimes. On the part of the victims of such crimes, they also receive justice and redress for…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For every American that sees capital punishment as a senseless and unnecessary act of violence, there are several who believe that this sentence is the ultimate act of justice. For as long as the act of capital punishment has been around, the arguments for and against it have also been clearly present. When forced to compare these arguments, it is clear…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death penalty is one the debatable topics throughout the world. There is a conflict between law and ethics. Public opinion does not coincide with the state opinion. There are 33 countries, which use death penalty as capital punishment. According to Amnesty International Report, in 2011, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and USA topped the list. According to statistics, in USA 33 states use death penalty as capital punishment and other 17 does not. (Amnesty International, 2011) Death penalty’s primary goal is to make people think twice before doing crime. The Death penalty helps to decrease the murder’s rate, however it could violate human right.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an issue that has continually caused tension in today’s society. The main discussion over this is whether or not the death penalty serves as a valid and justified form of punishment. We have reached the point where if the topic is brought up, extremists on both sides immediately begin to argue the matter. One side says increase in crime rate, the other says failure to discourage crime; one says failure to rehabilitate, the other says it saves lives; one says justice and retribution, the other says revenge. As a society we know that crime is a major part of our lives, and we are all aware that something must be done about it. The only problem now is coming together and finding common ground as to how we solve it. The death penalty has been applied by many parts of the world, from the ancient times of Babylon to present day America. More than an estimated 15, 269 Americans have been executed since the inception of the death penalty dating back to colonial times. History has shown us that capital punishment, whose definition is the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment, is a very efficient and acceptable means of reducing crime.…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To sum up, to be choice about the death penalty if we don’t enforce it, then the crime will increase, the same criminal might go out and repeat the same crime, law and…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages

    "Support for Death Penalty Wanes | Amnesty International." Amnesty International. Web. 20 Apr. 2012. .…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In dozens of countries, democratic governments in the course of conducting a major review of their national constitutions have decided to curtail, if not abolish, the death penalty. In national systems and as a matter of international law, it is increasingly recognised that the death penalty has no place in a democratic and civilised society. India is sovereign, secular, and democratic. And yet, it is astonishing that India is one of the few, to be exact, 54 countries in the world, which still embraces the concept of capital punishment…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Types of Death Penalty

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    for its well-being, as is the demand upon the citizen-warrior to meet death upon the battle-field, or upon the doctor to remain steadfast at his duty in the plague-stricken city. The good of society is the prime reason for the punishment of criminals and their reformation is justifiable only when it conduces to this end” (Hall, 1902, p. 390).…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I were to ask about the Re-imposition of Death penalty in the Philippines, As a Christian who believe in Jesus Christ as the judge of all judges & believe in the bible as a word of our God & fundamental of our beliefs , I totally disagree with that issue it simply telling us that they’re going to inflict death to a person as a punishment for an offense. It’s absolutely an act of killing. It may be for the good of almost everyone but still it is a sin. You may call me close minded but still it is a sin. The sixth of the ten commandments in the book of Exodus says “Thou shall not kill.” Neither accidental killing (Numbers 35:22-25) nor justifiable homicide (Ex. 22:2) are a breaking of the sixth commandment. Neither killing in war nor capital punishment are necessarily forbidden in this commandment since God required both in certain cases (Ex.21:12). We kill cows, pigs, chickens & we slap flies but we can’t do any of these things to humans. Only humans are made in the image of God. This is why we are not to kill people like we might decide to kill an animal. Humans have special dignity and worth and human life is to be treated as of special worth since we are made in the image of God.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the third speaker of the Negative team, I strongly oppose to this resolution, Resolved, That Death Penalty Be Restored in the Philippines. Why? Because Death Penalty deprives people the right to life. In Article II, Section11 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution states: "The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights". The Commission on Human Rights has opposed the enactment of any law re-imposing the death penalty law in the Philippines on the ground that it offends the dignity of human person and human rights. The abolition of the death penalty by the 1987 Constitution was a very big step towards a practical recognition of the dignity of every human being created to the image and likeness of God, and of the value of human life from its conception to its natural end. Every human being has the inherent right to life and this right must be protected by law. However, this right is not as sacrosanct and inviolable as it sounds. The main principle in human rights law is that no-one shall be arbitrarily deprived of life. Amnesty International (www.amnestyinternational.org. retrieved January 18, 2013) states, “The death penalty violates the right to life.” Capital punishment contradicts our moral beliefs and claims of a fair and just government. This makes the death penalty our most fundamental human rights violation. It is the denial of the most basic human rights. The Illinois Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (www.icadp.org retrieved January 15, 2013) states, “We don’t cut off the hands of thieves to protect property; we do not stone adulterers to stop adultery. We consider that barbaric. Yet we continue to take life as a means of protecting life.” No person, government-affiliated or not, has the right to decide if another human is worthy or unworthy of life. Our natural rights as humans, which cannot be taken away by the government, include the right to…

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays