The death penalty is a big issue in our society today. Many people are confused if the death penalty is right or wrong. I feel that the death penalty should be carried out. I have many reasons why the death penalty should be carried out. The death penalty would save government money and help keep criminal activity under control. First of all, it would save jail space and money. By enforcing the death penalty our jails would be less crowded and we would save money by not feeding and all other stuff given to the criminal while being in jail. We always here that many criminals are being let go out of jail due to the over crowded jail space, and so by getting rid of the criminal by the death penalty we would be able to create more space in the jails and so we won’t be letting criminals out as early. I feel that our tax dollars is being wasted on animal criminals that enjoy their day in jail, while we are working our butts off at work or school, criminals are probably enjoying a nice game of basketball or having fun weight lifting. Criminals are supposed to be punished for a crime that they committed not be treated as if they are kings. Next, the death penalty would help keep criminal activity under control. The death penalty helps control criminal activity because it scares criminals. I feel that’s why the United States has problems controlling crime because its criminals are not scared. If we use the death penalty more, it might help criminals think twice before killing someone.
The people against the death penalty feel that we are breaking an amendment. I feel that the death penalty is not cruel or unusual punishment because it is not cruel that the person should die because he deserves it and it is not unusual because we are not cutting his hand off or anything. To sum up, to be choice about the death penalty if we don’t enforce it, then the crime will increase, the same criminal might go out and repeat the same crime, law and order would not be under control and that our jails would become over crowded. We spend our tax dollars on these types of animals, lets take our tax dollars and go spend it on our schools and more important stuff.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The death penalty is a very controversial topic that some may oppose while others assent. I have read two interesting essays about the death penalty. One is entitled “The Penalty of Death” by H.L Mencken and the other “Execution” by Anna Quindlen. Both authors presented their arguments and used great points to support their opinions. H.L Mencken is for the death penalty while Anna Quindlen is against it. After reading these two authors work I was able to form my own opinion on this punishment. I condone the death penalty despite how cruel it may be.…
- 311 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…
- 849 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Historically there is no clear evidence that the death penalty has decreased the murder rate or acted as an effective deterrent to murder. Capital punishment is a violation of natural rights. This is wrong for everyone who is involved: The prosecuted innocent, the criminals, the victim’s family and our nation. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for the innocent. Nothing good comes out of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment.…
- 534 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
By enforcing the death penalty we will reduce crime tremendously. If we enforce this with extreme prejudice other people will think twice before commiting a crime. Thus the streets will be safer for our children.…
- 369 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
For instance, it is unfair to the criminals in which the evidence against them is weak and in which it was an accident. Executing a person who could possibly be innocent is morally wrong and inhumane. I believe that for the criminals to die in such a public and painful way is cruel and unusual. It is not an effective way of handing out justice. The death penalty can also keep the victim’s families stuck in an angry stage of grief. Moreover, the death penalty might bring the opposite of what survivors of crime most need; accountability, healing and closure. Those criminals have family and loved ones too. Some of them even have a wife and children, why should they suffer by seeing or knowing that their loved one is being sentenced to death?…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…
- 2140 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Capital punishment will deter people from committing a crime. In 1973, Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing a murder. For each execution, the crime rate dropped by over 18%. By having the death penalty in our law system, it will teach kids to stay in school, so they don't get into…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Philosopher Emmanuel Kant made an argument stating that killing someone for deterrence is using them as a tool, and it is unjust within itself (Pojman 70). Many think that by having the death penalty as a consequence for first degree murder, the rates of homicide will drop, because it will “put fear into the hearts of people”(Costanzo 96), but that is not correct. In a survey done by the Death Penalty Information Center, the number of murders in a state implementing the death penalty within the last twenty years have been higher than in a state without the penalty. As recently as 2010, the murder rate of states with the penalty was 25% greater than states without the penalty (“Deterrence”). Those statistics show that although the law may stop a few individuals, it is not a considerable enough number to call it deterrence.…
- 1980 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
As a deterrent to crime, the death penalty has little effect because the chances of a murder being sentenced to death are slim to none. However the death penalty deters some people. As the Royal Commission (1948–1953) observed in its lengthy and thoughtful report, “We can number its failures, but we cannot number its successes.”23 We can never know how many people who would have otherwise committed murder stopped them only because society threatened death as punishment. The deterrence question, really, is not whether the death penalty deters—sometimes it surely does—but whether, on balance, it deters more effectively than life without parole. (D’elia).…
- 872 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is a method that the justice system uses to punish wrong doers for centuries, but as of late has become a hot issue of debate. There are many reasons that surround the debate of the death penalty one of them being due to the harshness of the punishment itself. People against the death penalty argue that the death penalty is a violation of the 8th amendment due to it being a cruel and an unusual punishment. Others argue that it is not. Some argue if the cost of the death penalty is worth it while others argue that it is. Although both have their own views, in the end, the death penalty is nonetheless a useless tool for safety.…
- 994 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Killers should expect to be killed. With the death penalty in place less people die. If we go ahead and kill them now after they have killed some one then it prevents them from killing again. They cant kill the wittiness. They wont have the chance to plot any other killings. It gives closer to the victims family. The family gets to watch him die like he watched their family member die. Either way it cost a lot of money for someone to live in prison or be put to death.…
- 1378 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The death penalty in the United States should be abolished. The death penalty has no evidence that it deters crime. Texas has the highest death penalty count in North America, and also the highest homicide rate in America. (Millett) If anything the death penalty makes crime worst. The south has the highest death penalty count in the United States and the highest homicide rate, which is 600,000. The North east has the smallest amount of states with the death penalty, and their homicide rate (380,000) is also the smallest. (Death Penalty Information Center 3-4) Right now in the United States thirty-five states use the death penalty, and 15 states don’t. Many U.S citizens think the death penalty is…
- 986 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays