Preview

The Decline of the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1384 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Decline of the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two of the most powerful entities to rule their respective parts of the world. The Han Dynasty dominated Asia from the Korean peninsula to present day Vietnam for more than four hundred years. The Roman Empire stretched from the present British Isles to present day Iraq, and lasted nearly five hundred years. The Eastern Roman Empire went on to last another one thousand years. Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire enjoyed times of immense prosperity during their golden years. They both ended in chaos. How were their declines similar?

Augustus, the first emperor of the Roman Empire, brought order to the vast lands Rome had conquered and brought an end to over one hundred years of civil war. He disbanded the large armies that had been recruited during the civil war and consolidated his power. The people welcomed the new dictator, and enjoyed peace and prosperity. With peace came increased trade and commerce, and ideas traveled freely along the Roman Empire's well designed roads. However, the emperors after Augustus were not as politically gifted as Augustus. Four emperors and fifty-four years later, the Roman Empire was once again thrown into a violent civil war.

After four coups in a single year, another line of emperors emerged. The line started by Vespasian was also a stable time. The Roman Empire reached its largest size during this time, and many historians consider those years the golden age of Rome. Inevitably, out of such a successful line of emperors, there would eventually emerge a bad apple. The emperor Commodus threw himself into immoral and violent practices, and gave no respect to any of the leaders. He was assassinated in 192 A.D., bringing an end to one century of stability. This date marked the beginning of the end.

The Romans gradually lost power, and barbarian people in the north frequently went on raids against the now disintegrating empire. The Roman Empire became steeped in debt as emperors

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome had some Similarities. Both Han China and Imperial Rome had very large empires that it was difficult to manage their boarders and often faced threats. Both Empires were patriarchal societies and kept women in low status with no say in political affairs. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were ruled by one centralized ruler. Both empires had standardized coins to promote…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aftermath of the fall of Han China was much different than that of Imperial Rome. After Han China collapsed, and the barbarians invaded, the region was in chaos for around 350 years. Despite that, China was reassembled under new dynasties and they remained an empire until the early 20th century. On the contrary, the Roman Empire was broken up and integrated into new civilizations and combined with many other ideals. Nevertheless, the Roman Empire never rose again in any form. The effect of these empires collapse was the biggest difference in the fall of Han China and Imperial Rome.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han empires falls’ were also similar because of their decline in economic trade. Trade was extremely important for the Romans and Chinese so when it began to decline, so did the rest of the empire. As both empires borders expanded, they had to take more of the military to defend the borders rather than the trade routes, so the trade routes became compromised. People began stealing goods from merchants making the routes extremely dangerous. Because their was much less trade, the taxes to the government were greatly reduced so they had to tax the people more. Most people could not afford the hike in taxes so the government was still unable to get all of their money, thus resulting in decline.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires had problems with social in takes. The Han Dynasty had problems with taxations, peasants grew angry over the raise of taxes and revolved against china so they used the military to stop them but soon needed more soldiers so, the Han government forced many farmers and others to fight as well, generating a large group of angry citizens. The Romans struggled with religion more than taxes as Christianity spread through Rome officials…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome Comparison

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han and Rome were two great empires that had similarities and differences. Han and Rome at a similar decline because of the lack of a stable economy. The different political systems caused Han and Rome to rise differently.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman history was known for having many bad emperors and Nero was amongst one of them. He became famous for his self-indulgence and cruel behavior. He was the last emperor from his period. Nero was the first to persecute Christians and set a model for that religion's oppression that went on and on for many years. Augustus had brought and secured harmony to the Roman Empire and during his reign he combined a range of powers. Caligula four years as emperor were bizarre and after his assassination, his uncle, Claudius came into power. Often depicted as a mug, he was able to show his capability as an emperor from time to time. After Claudius died, Nero came to power.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the greatest empires in all of history, the Ancient Roman and the Han China empires are similar in terms of both creating great inventions still used today; however, they are different in terms of how their militaries were organized and their religious beliefs.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, they both began to grow rapidly and out of control towards the end of their times because they could not support all of the people that were moving inside their walls. This must have been a hard time for them because they were doing to well until the time that because they were growing so rapidly they could not support all of their newfound citizens. Another similarity economically is that they both traded with other societies and because of this many things were passed on such as plagues. One of the reasons they both fell was because of plagues, the Romans had the Black plague while the Han had the Antonine plague. The last reason that they both fell was how they handled agriculture. On one hand the Han always had the promise of new land to peasants is they served in the war but after a while they started to run out of land that they would do and that made people very upset. These examples of defeat are helpful for us to know because enow we can use them and realize that with all of our new ideas and technology we don’t have to make the same mistakes that many ancient societies did that eventually lead to their…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Imperial Roman Empire (31 BCE- 476 CE) and the Han dynasty (206-220 CE) were considered the strongest empires of their time and nearly unrivaled in conquest and expansion of their empires. They both varied in similarities and differences such as government, belief systems and economy.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Roman Empire is known as one of the greatest empires of all time, blossoming politically, economically, and culturally. Rome was quickly expanding, reaching as far as North Africa. When Octavian came into power, the Pax Romana, or “Roman Peace,” began. However, this long peace may have triggered the beginning of the end of the Roman Empire. Because Rome was not distracted by conquering foreign lands, its citizens relaxed and lived in luxury. There did not seem to be any goals they did not meet; they were so blinded by their success that they did not realize complications within their own empire were slowly emerging. Some of these emerging factors that led to the downward spiral of Rome include: the instability and corruption of its government, which was the primary reason Rome declined; a dwindling military, which led to vulnerable spots; and invasions launched by foreign tribes, who took note of these vulnerabilities.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, one of the reasons that led to the decline of the Western Roman Empire was cause by inside decay. It has been said that the Roman's military crisis was a huge factor in this decay. According to Indro Montanelli, the military crisis was the result of shortage of children. The children in Rome were not old enough at the time to serve in the army this resulted in lack of soldiers. The lack of soldiers meant that the Roman Empire could not defend themselves and did not have a strong army. In that cause Rome had to come up with a plan to solve this problem. This plan was to recruit Germans to serve in the Roman army. But, this was not a well-thought plan, because traders were difficult to detect. Recruiting Germans to serve in the Roman army made it possible for the Germans to easily attack them. Given that they were already in the base of the empire, they did not have to worry about getting into the city. It was said that the military crisis was a huge part in the internal decay, which eventually led to the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had too much power and wealth. It was a unified attack.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics