them.
them.
Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…
The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were two of the most powerful civilizations of their era. From a few centuries B.C.E. to a couple centuries after C.E., these empires significantly enhanced their cultures with advancements in technology, but differed in their views of technologies importance and how it was valued. The Han Empire was much more worried about how technology could be advanced to ease the workload of the common man while increasing efficiency, where as the Roman Empire viewed technology as something they were happy to benefit from, but not to be exalted. Even though both civilizations had great technological achievements, they differed greatly in their attitudes toward these achievements and their effects on the laborer, the environment, and manufacturing.…
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…
To start off, the Han and roman perceived new technology’s in different ways such as approving and disapproving, this is issued in these documents. (doc3) tells about the pestle and the mortar which were invented by the emperor Fuxi. The document states things such as “cleverly improved” or “increasing…
The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…
The author’s thesis in this section is that despite having the factors to help them succeed, the Ming Empire did not want global dominance. The author included this empire to show that although this empire had many helpful characteristics, it did not reach world domination.…
The Roman and Han empires were both very powerful, in their own rights. Although their culture and beliefs were very different, their ideology and governments were, at points, very similar. Both empires experienced a rise, plateau, and fall, which eventually changed their entire empires.…
Essay #1-Compare and Contrast the Han and Roman Empires in terms of their technological achievements…
The Classical Romans and Hans both had fascinating views on technology. Because they were both such great empires, they managed to create a wide variety of technology. When the scholars were inventing it, they were focused on creating life much easier than it was. Technology was made important in more than one way, and attitudes toward it varied from person to person. And even though these attitudes varied, the technology was still improved to become the basis of what we have today. The Han and Romans’ attitudes toward technology were aimed at improving their tools since most of the Han technology is about agriculture and ways to decrease the workload, while the Romans sought to create an easier way of transporting goods throughout the empire, while maintaining a mathematical system to regulate it.…
The religion in Rome was much more thorough than the Han religion. Roman rulers organized the state religion while the Han emperors were more earthly. The Han emperors acknowledged the existence of the gods and participated in ceremonies, but didn’t really have much concern for them. Both Empires focused on rituals that would bring loyalty to the empire, but neither of them were extremely spiritual. The Han Empire used Confucian thought as their primary ideology.…
The Han and the Romans were ahead of the game when it came to technology. However, they both had very different attitudes towards the subject. The Han were determined to get ahead and they were supportive of others who made advances within the empire, whereas the Romans, although determined to get ahead, were arrogant and judgmental of each other’s work.…
After studying the provided documents (#1-8) its come to my understanding that both the Han and Roman empires thought of technology as useful and somewhat revolutionary, but both of them had somewhat different feelings of it. The Han dynasties attitude toward technology was that they thought it was very benefical, and they admired it. The reason this was because they though it to be very helpful in agriculture and construction purposes. Evidence of the positive effects of this can be seen in Document 4: History of the Early Han Dynasty which tells of a governer of Nanynay and as the very generous and loving person he was his policies also refelcted his personality. He had so much love for his people he wanted to lift weight of their shoulders and make their lives a little easier by inventing a water-powered blowing-engine which was enjoyed by eveyone adopted and spread his invention. The Roman empire however were not as positive about technology as the Hans. Even though they appreciated it to some extent the main viewpoint from the documents suggested that they thought of it was a bit demeaning also. Evidence can be found in Document 7, written by an upper-class Roman philospher and adviser which was saying that he did not believe that tools were created by "wise men" meaning a very developed mind, or someone who was thinking outside the box. He believe like the hammer for instance was created by a simple minded human, though its a very popular tool it was not advanced a tool as it could've been.…
The Roman and the Han were by far the most technologically advanced civilizations of their time. The time period for both of the societies depicted whether or not the people were inclined to their advancements or not. Much evidence goes to show that both the Roman and Han societies attitudes towards technology in B.C.E. were more negative and in C.E. they leaned more positive. In the documents given, it is evident that during the B.C.E. both the Roman and Han’s attitude toward their technologies were negative. Little did they know how helpful they would turn out to be and how they would revolutionize the world forever. This is first apparent from an excerpt from a Han government official. He states that they need more water conservation offices that are staffed with people who are experienced to aid the local community with the floods (doc. 1). This exemplifies that the people were dissatisfied with the lack of officials to keep the community organized and free of danger. This negative theme is also seen in a passage written by a Han government official (Han Guan) who is complaining about the iron tools and how they were made better when they were made individually by the common people rather than mass-produced by the state. He also touches on the fact that salt and iron prices have sky rocketed so the common people could not afford to season their food and make tools for themselves…
The Han dynasty was proud of the efficiency of their technology and their ability to prevent natural disasters. The Romans marveled at their technological advancements, but didn’t think it was very enlightening when it came to craft.…