Preview

The Difference between Rich and Poor in Ancient Rome

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Difference between Rich and Poor in Ancient Rome
In Ancient Rome has rich and poor people although there are more poor than rich. There was a huge difference between the rich and the poor. But with the poor people in Rome more than half of the poor’s were also jobless. Mostly all of the jobless Romans only survived because of the food the government gave them. But mostly everyone had a slave rich or poor.

The rich Romans lived a life of luxury. They would host giant parties with lots of food. Also most of the food that the government gave out to the poor’s came from rich Romans homes. The richer Romans were know for there feast they would often serve meat such as partridge or wild boar. On special occasions they would serve flamingo or ostrich. For a special dessert they would have dormouse cooked in honey. Normally during the feast they would have some type of entertainment.

The poor’s would live in small apartment like houses were they had to carry everything over the stairs, although sometimes they would just throw trash out the windows. Also since there houses were made of wood they would catch on fire. In A.D. 64 there was a huge fire that destroyed most of the city.

The Coliseum was a big thing in Rome. Rich and poor would go to see the fights between humans vs. humans, animals vs. animals, humans vs. animals and gladiators vs. gladiators. The fights were normally between slaves held captive and forced to fight but some fighters were just town’s men and some women who wanted the fame. Although they didn’t fight until death the gladiators did. With the gladiator fights if one of the gladiators was injured the emperor could put up his thumb and he would be saved but if he put his thumb down it meant death. The strange thing was that sometimes they would even have clowns performing in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When reading about the Roman gladiator games as well as the chariot races and theater events, it can be quite difficult to truly envision what it was like for the participants and the spectators of such events. The participants in such activities were overall viewed as low-class citizens. Gladiators, charioteers and actors in the theater all “had little more status than slaves.” The participants of the games were meant to entertain the spectators, and nothing else. Besides the fact that the participants were seen as low class, they also faced very brutal conditions in the games. The gladiators and charioteers were susceptible to violent, gory deaths. For gladiators, often times their throats were cut and the knives eventually made their way to the gladiator’s hearts. Another possible outcome for gladiators, was being ripped to pieces by various animals. Whether their death came by combat with another gladiator or by animal, it was nothing short of gruesome. This gruesomeness though, was enjoyed by many. Chariot…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    place that the poor people would live in was called the slums. These areas would be all polluted and most of the people that would live there were sick and starving, for not having any food.They would survive on minimal wage, food and water just staying alive and this could be a huge challenge for them.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through 21st Century eyes the idea of gladiators fighting to the death, and of an amphitheatre where such brutality could take place watched by an enthusiastic audience, represents the cruel face of Roman Society. Nonetheless, to the Romans it represented an important feature of their civilization. Opposition to the games was seldom seen.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The seating and thoughts on the entertainment of Roman gladiators is similar to the audience experience of the Hunger Games. The Capitol watched the Hunger Games happily while people in the Districts watched painfully as young people from their district died. The Capitol watched the Hunger Games from their homes, seated and in plazas, which was much more luxurious than the Districts sitting in their homes and outside on outdated televisions and the projector. Much like the seating at the Colosseum, the Districts did not have the privilege of comfortable seating compared to the people in the Capitol. The audience experience of Roman gladiators and the Hunger Games were similar because the admission fee for both was free. This was because the leaders wanted to control the people watching the gladiatorial…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    11). For the Roman populous, blood offerings were an intrinsic aspect of funeral gatherings, a fact acknowledged by sociologist Keith Hopkins, who states that they acted as a, “reconciliation for the deceased with the living.” Expanding on from this idea the text ‘Gladiator – Rome’s Bloody Spectacle’ explores the concept that, in the hope to placate the deceased with human blood, the Romans sacrificed prisoners of war and slaves, and decided to, “add pleasure through Gladiatorial fighting” (Nossov 2009, p. 12). Oft Cited historian, Konstantin Nossov suggests that, by the end of the Third Century B.C, Rome controlled the “entire Mediterranean along…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gladiators were mostly unfree individuals either condemned criminals, prisoners of wars who had lost their citizenship rights, although, some of them were volunteers who were mostly freedmen or very low classes of freeborn men who chose to be a slave for monetary rewards or for the fame. Gladiators were brought for the purpose of gladiatorial combat and would endure branding, chains, flogging or death by the sword and subjected to a rigorous training, fed on a high-energy diet, and given expert medical attention. Gladiators were famously popular in ancient from for seven centuries, from the 3rd century BC to the 4th century AD fairly late in the Public occupied a prominent position in roman society, they would fight in massive amphitheatres, the most famous being the Colosseum in Rome. The games slowly transformed into spectator, a form of public execution and was seen by the public as entertainment in simpler, rougher times. It escalated as the Romans valued the art of killing and acted as a distraction for its citizens, allowed them to release their violent impulses and aggression within a completely separate social realm. We can assume that there were gladiatorial fights before this in Rome but were not recorded and the tradition of gladiatorial combats did not evolve in Rome but considered to have come from the Etruscans.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Catcher and The Bell Jar " Two Coming of Age Novels While J.D. Salinger 's The Catcher in the Rye and Sylvia Plath 's The Bell Jar are two entirely different novels with different themes at first glance, both tell tales of teenagers who are coming of age and learning responsibility. In The Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield has been kicked out of school and is trying to decide what he wants to do with his life. In The Bell Jar, Esther Greenwood tries to kill herself and is trying to figure out what she wants to do with her life. In both novels, the protagonists are learning to grow up and take responsibility. Both are experiencing difficult situations and are dealing with them. Throughout both novels it can be seen that Holden and Esther are becoming better able to deal with their situations. While both novels deal with coming of age in different manners, the main idea of growing up is shown through the characters struggles to figure out what they want, looking at death, and examining the characters relationships with their parents.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greeks vs Romans

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contrast- Greeks thought it was degrading to get dirty so they hired slaves to do their farming. Romans were the complete opposite they cultivated their own lands.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Ancient Rome the women were not allowed to have a political position or to vote. In roman culture they stressed the importance of the family and the woman was the center of the family circle. (1) Women in ancient China were expected to be house wives and to be completely obedient to their husbands. Taking care of the children was expected for the majority of women in ancient China. (8) They were expected to bear many children and most women were the pressured to bear a son. They had to do the house work which included sewing, cleaning and preparing the meals along with other duties. Life was different for Roman women as opposed to the Chinese wives; the Roman women lived more of a life of luxury. They were allowed to take part in a lot of the roman cultural events, such as sporting events, private and public baths, and so forth. They often went to the public baths these were considered a recreational activity in Rome, people of all ages, social classes, and sexes enjoyed these.(1) Most of the time there were separate baths for men and women, if not women used it in the morning…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Gladiators

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gladiators were put up against each other to fights to the death. The winning gladiator waited for a sign from the crowd on whether to kill or not to kill the other gladiator; if the gladiator put up a good fight then his life just might be spared (“Gladiators, Chariots, and the Roman Games”.) All Gladiators swore a solemn oath, “I will endure to be burned, to be bound, to be beaten, and to be killed by the sword” (McManus, “Gladiator Games”.)…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my perfect world it would be democratic, and there would be no slaves or any type of social class. Unfortunately, excluding the time of creation, the world is not and has never been perfect. In Ancient Greece there were four different social classes. The privileged upper-class were those that ruled Athens. Native by birth they enjoyed social excess and great wealth. The upper class were practically the head of all enterprise and endeavour and were referred to as natives. The Middle class was next in the hierarchy. Not born to privilege in Athens they were referred to as the metrics and generally came from surrounding regions to settle and work in Athens. The metrics were free people having never been slaves. They enjoyed as…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tiberius Gracchus

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The rich became immensely powerful because they employed slaves for labor. Also, their numbers increases uncontrollably and they were the majorities of the population. (Extract Appian Roman History 7). For their part, the poor criticized the rich that they are deteriorated to abject misery and could not bear children. (Extract Appian Roman History 10) At this point, Tiberius expressed concerns of the problems. He gave a speech for the Italians about them suffering because of shortage of men, poverty and taxes. Furthermore, to ensure the poor were protected from the rich, he proposed the act of “forbid sale”(New farmers are not allowed to sell their farms to the rich). This shows his solitude for the common people is noticeable.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There wasn’t any ventilation, or toilets, or running water, but the landlords still charged a lot, because they were immigrants. There were rats everywhere, and there were about eight or nine people that lived in one tiny little room. The rent was super high, and when the people couldn’t pay it, they were forced to leave their stuff their so that the landlord could have back-rent, until the immigrants could pay it. They were forced to live on the streets without any money or their things.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Roman Republic there were two classes of people, the Patricians and the Plebeians. Each citizen was born into their role, which means that they could be rich but still be considered a plebeian. Plebeians made up 95% of the population and patricians only made up 5% (Hunt, 149). This strict division between the classes led to many conflicts. This conflict is known as the Struggle of Orders.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays