Preview

The Dilemma Of War And Peace Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Dilemma Of War And Peace Analysis
Introduction

The dilemma of war and peace has been a decisive concern for philosophers and political thinkers in the past, which still remains actual nowadays. The famous advocates of the power of truth always found that wars are immoral. For instance, German famous professor of theology, Martin Luter in his theological work "War and Warship" warns against unfair and wrong motives behind wars and armed conflicts: offensive and preventive wars, violent overthrow of tyrants, subjects’ rebellion against the rulers, and crusades (Andreas, 2013). Moreover, in 1964 the advocate of civil rights Martin Luter King’s in his speech, on the occasion of the award of the Nobel Peace Prize said 'sooner or later all the people
…show more content…
The new unstable geopolitical situation and wars

In his article "The dangers of new forms of political community" author Andrew Linklater noticed that 'even though new forms of political community have more multinational character and nature than previously it is important to note, that Violent Nationalism and Increasing inequalities between the global rich and global poor can be the main factor for future conflicts between nations' (Smith S.,2006, p.721). In addition, Giuseppe Caforio in his book "Armed Forces and Conflict Resolution" critically believed that 'the negative effect of globalization has continued creating a large disenfranchised population primarily centred in the Middle East, Africa and Asia' (Caforio,2008, p.8). According to the report of the National Intelligence Council's international experts predict what will become the world in 2020. Declaring the following:
• 'The United States of America and European countries will keep leadership;
• the influence in the world from China and India will increase;
• the Russians can show economic growth, which may be limited by geopolitical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "…It seemed clear that wars were not made by generations and their special stupidities, but wars were made instead by something ignorant in the human heart."…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Separate Peace is a fiction book that is written about some actual events in the author, John Knowles life. Set mostly during World War ll, this book apprises the lives of boys that attend an elite prep school called Devon. The main character Gene, looks back at his days in the school, and remembers the good and bad times with his best buddy, Finny. Together, the boys bring on many themes and symbols. The themes jealousy, warfare and a search for identity are three important themes that stand out and can easily be conveyed about this captivating story.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War never ends quietly; while the battlefield tells the most immediate brutal stories, it is the aftermath that shows the greatest tragedy. The Vietnam War is not an exception; it resulted in countless damages, the worst being the psychological trauma suffered by its participants. This therefore becomes a recurring subject explored by many Vietnam War authors, who wrote of an experience they lived first hand. The depiction of psychological trauma in their works heightens the brutality of the war and criticises its tragic futility.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US role in 21st century world affairs must shape an international community that benefits US interests, and is neither dependent on nor antagonistic to US global supremacy. The US may achieve this by relying on soft power and the influence of our global allies and competitors to accomplish our national security goals. America should lead world affairs through cooperation and sharing of our ideals to solve geopolitical problems, rather than relying primarily on our military preeminence. The current National Strategy calls for the United States to lead the international order “as a nation first among equals”, suggesting that it is the citizens’ responsibility to encourage stability, foster economic growth, promote democratic values, and protect global strategic interests while respecting the intertwined goals and values of the global community. America must rely on this softer strategy as we proceed into the next decade, in order to ensure our dominance at home and abroad. This forward-thinking role is practical because the world of the 21st century is a multilateral world where, while retaining military, economic, and cultural preeminence, the US may be challenged by adversaries and allies alike as power shifts and resources become scarcer. In the coming decades, our strength will rely on the ability to persuade rather than coerce our global neighbors, and to work “through, by and with” partners to cross-level political and economic burdens.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smiths, S. Owens, P. (2008) The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A quotation is cited by Augustine as the basis for a just war “"A just war is wont to be described as one that avenges wrongs, when a nation or state has to be punished, for refusing to make amends for the wrongs inflicted by its subjects, or to restore what it has seized unjustly." It would be cruel to let the innocent suffer harm from malicious belligerents, especially if one had the means to protect the innocent and suppress the malicious (Reichberg 235).…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Peacemaker Analysis

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Peace would result in an unstoppable power that others would want to emulate or become a part of, resulting in an indissoluble union” (Rice, 2008, p. 411) Dr. Kings peace movement was a perfect example of this. The people that were tired of being treated unfairly followed him. However, the people that didn’t want peace went against Dr. King eventually killing him. I think of peace is black and white because you either want to live in a worry-free and happy world with peace or live in a world of sadness and death without peace. The Peacemaker explained that having peace meant, “They would be without fear, sadness and anger”. (Rice, 2008, p. 411) There could be no way to be in between peace.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War and Peace

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The United States should use military force in defense of personal liberties and rights, for stability and security, in self defense, and as a last resort, when peaceful resolution and/or compromise is impossible. The goal of U.S. foreign policy should be to that which benefits itself and its citizens. Peace is possible, but not always sustainable. The topic of War and Peace has been the central, continually recurring issue throughout a majority of United States history, continually affecting everyday modern life within the international community. War is an unpleasant, yet necessary instance that will likely continue to pervade human interaction. Peace, being the opposite of war, is seen as preferable, but lacks the problem solving abilities of war. Because of this intricate relationship, the two will always be in tango, each affecting each other in every way. Foreign policy, the interaction with others, will constantly dictate the states of war and peace, and when their existence is permitted. The essay will attempt to explain war in terms of conflicting self interest, compromise, and violence. The essay will attempt to form a definite stance concerning foreign policy, and answer how we should interact with other people/countries, and why. Foreign policy stance will form the baseline for clauses of when going to war is acceptable. And war will be analyzed in depth to explain why it occurs, what happens in it, and what it ends in. These ideas will be supported by examples from American History, including the American Revolution, the Civil War, the French and Indian War, and French Revolution, through recognizing patterns throughout history, in-depth analysis, and factual evidence.…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Globalization

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critics of globalization have been concerned that the spread of a global consumerism would wipe out local cultures and homogenize the entire world, but Foer returned convinced that globalization has not and will not soon wipe away local institutions and cultures. On the contrary, he suspects the opposite has happened: In response to the threat of global integration, local entities have launched counterattacks that are successful but "not always in such a good way." Globalization means different things to different people. To those who favor it, it represents fewer reasons for armed conflicts, more opportunities for escaping the confines of tradition and narrow-mindedness, a higher standard of living, and more access to the good things of life; in short, capitalism and democracy. To those who mistrust it or hate it, it means the submersion of national sovereignty, the extinction of regional cultures, the enrichment of multinational corporations and the bankruptcy of corner stores, the undermining of religion, and the corruption of morality; in short, capitalism and democracy.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the insurgence of technology and new methods of communication in the last 50 years, everyday people are now far more familiar with foreigners than their grandparents were. Since such a large population has access to the internet, a plethora of information is being shared constantly and transported across the globe. This method of communication creates a wider scope of discourse and public awareness. As we gain this information, our generation becomes more enlightened to cultures, peoples around the world, and the issues that we have yet to solve. This movement of how we can all fit together in a peaceful existence has enabled us to largely avoid large-scale conflict. Also, if having a new sense of knowledge and recognition was not enough, in today’s age our economies rely so heavily on other countries and our alliances are so intertwined, especially with institutions like the UN, NATO, and OPEC, the possibility of any major conflict arising has been significantly…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glorification Of War

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roberts reported, “Politicians backed by public opinion were more and more ready to threaten war and to regard peaceful compromises as dishonourable” (Roberts, 49). The glorification of war in the 19th and 20th centuries lead to people thinking that, since war was noble, peace was disgraceful and dishonorable. This, combined with the idea of nationalism, made war a desirable prospect for both politicians and the public.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays