In 2011, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified mobile phone radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. That means that there "could be some risk" of carcinogenicity, so additional research into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones needs to be conducted.[2] The WHO added that "to date, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use."[3] Some national radiation advisory authorities[4] have recommended measures to minimize exposure to their citizens as a precautionary approach.
The effect of mobile phone radiation on human health is the subject of recent interest and study, as a result of the enormous increase in mobile phone usage throughout the world. As of November 2011, there were more than 6 billion subscriptions worldwide.[1] Mobile phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range. Other digital wireless systems, such as data communication networks, produce similar radiation.
In 2011, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified mobile phone radiation as Group 2B - possibly carcinogenic. That means that there "could be some risk" of carcinogenicity, so additional research into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones needs to be conducted.[2] The WHO added that "to date, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use."[3] Some national radiation advisory authorities[4] have recommended measures to minimize exposure to their citizens as a precautionary approach.
Negative Effects of Internet Usage on Child Development
The Internet has some positive aspects but there are also negative aspects to the information highway. There is now some concern from educators and psychologist about the impact of the Internet on the physical, cognitive, and social development of children. According to the HomeNet study, it was found that teenagers are much heavier users than their parents (Affonso, 1999). The main use of the Internet for teenagers is to play games, to listen to music, and to meet new people.
Impact on Physical Development
Early childhood development emphasizes physical manipulation coordinated with observation and social interaction about the effects of manipulations (Pierce, 1994). The “hands on” experiences are vital to the developing concepts such as conversation and cause-and-effect relations. There is no evidence that virtual manipulation will generate the same intellectual skills and personal agency that come from physical manipulation.
The Internet consists of quick and easy access to a vast amount of information. In early- child development it has been a practice to limit children’s obtaining of information by simplifying messages and sequencing content. Given the reported negative impact of information overload on some adults, such as “information fatigue syndrome,” it is likely this volume of information could be quite confusing to children with immature physical and cognitive structures (Pierce, 1994).
Impact on Cognitive Development
Information posted on the Internet is lawless. Young children depend on adults to validate what they see, hear and feel. The information on the Internet is uncontrolled and there is no way to check its reliability, and further, often no practical way to ensure referability (Pierce, 1994). Consequences children face by getting on the Internet are that they are less able to discriminate between what is and is not real, and they are unable to test reality in the virtual world.
Professor James Collins, a specialist in writing and teaching of writing at the State University of New York, at Buffalo, sees several educational problems surfacing among school kids that are directly traceable to their exposure to the online world. Students who are facing trouble in writing courses are plagiarizing research projects. Additionally, chattiness and informality considered appropriate in email communication is spilling over into the “formal” writings of high school students’ essays (Gates, 1998). Such negative influences are not only a threat for younger children but also for those in college. At a large university in New York, the dropout rate among freshmen new comers rose dramatically as their investment in computers and Internet access increased. Administrators learned that 43% of the dropouts were staying up all night on the Internet (Wallace, 1999, as cited in Affosno, 1999).
Impact on Social Development
The Internet can enrich children and their school-based learning and can be a tool for creative and intellectual work with others. However, when abused, Internet usage can also take children away from doing important social activities such as homework, chores and spending time with family and friends. Michael A. Weinstein, professor of Political Science at Purdue University believes Internet users will “lose the savvy and skills and patience to conduct social relations in the corporeal world,” and that the Internet will intensify the negative effect television has already had on our social skills (Weinstein, 1995, as cited in Affonso, 1999). Furthermore, there is a serious concern involving the proliferation of inappropriate content, such as violence, bias, hate speech, profanity, and pornography. The Internet gives children an easy way to find information and it permits unwelcomed messages to find their way to children.
Because of the seriousness of the impact of pornography on child development, a few extra words about the topic must be mentioned. Pornography can be generally defined as erotic depictions intended to provoke a sexual response (Casanova, 2000). It can exist in many forms, including videos, films, still pictures, and even comics. Child pornography pictures and videos usually depict acts of sexual intercourse, sodomy, cunnilingus, and fellatio between children and between a child and an adult (Esposito, 1998). It is easy to see how child pornography harms the child and destroys the idea of his or her childhood. Since child pornography is an illegal underground industry, it is impossible to determine the number of children involved in its production. Consequently, pornography is rampant on the Internet because pedophiles can transmit and download an illegal picture anonymously from a source, which is unregulated, and thereby avoid law enforcement. Child pornography causes much harm through its use by pedophiles as a tool to destroy children’s inhibitions, teach the performance of sexual acts, and threaten or blackmail children, thereby furthering actual abuse (Esposito, 1998). Society has struggled to regulate pornographic sources and materials on the Internet, which are unregulated and thereby avoid law enforcement.
Negative Effects of Internet Usage on Child Development
The Internet has some positive aspects but there are also negative aspects to the information highway. There is now some concern from educators and psychologist about the impact of the Internet on the physical, cognitive, and social development of children. According to the HomeNet study, it was found that teenagers are much heavier users than their parents (Affonso, 1999). The main use of the Internet for teenagers is to play games, to listen to music, and to meet new people.
Impact on Physical Development
Early childhood development emphasizes physical manipulation coordinated with observation and social interaction about the effects of manipulations (Pierce, 1994). The “hands on” experiences are vital to the developing concepts such as conversation and cause-and-effect relations. There is no evidence that virtual manipulation will generate the same intellectual skills and personal agency that come from physical manipulation.
The Internet consists of quick and easy access to a vast amount of information. In early- child development it has been a practice to limit children’s obtaining of information by simplifying messages and sequencing content. Given the reported negative impact of information overload on some adults, such as “information fatigue syndrome,” it is likely this volume of information could be quite confusing to children with immature physical and cognitive structures (Pierce, 1994).
Impact on Cognitive Development
Information posted on the Internet is lawless. Young children depend on adults to validate what they see, hear and feel. The information on the Internet is uncontrolled and there is no way to check its reliability, and further, often no practical way to ensure referability (Pierce, 1994). Consequences children face by getting on the Internet are that they are less able to discriminate between what is and is not real, and they are unable to test reality in the virtual world.
Professor James Collins, a specialist in writing and teaching of writing at the State University of New York, at Buffalo, sees several educational problems surfacing among school kids that are directly traceable to their exposure to the online world. Students who are facing trouble in writing courses are plagiarizing research projects. Additionally, chattiness and informality considered appropriate in email communication is spilling over into the “formal” writings of high school students’ essays (Gates, 1998). Such negative influences are not only a threat for younger children but also for those in college. At a large university in New York, the dropout rate among freshmen new comers rose dramatically as their investment in computers and Internet access increased. Administrators learned that 43% of the dropouts were staying up all night on the Internet (Wallace, 1999, as cited in Affosno, 1999).
Impact on Social Development
The Internet can enrich children and their school-based learning and can be a tool for creative and intellectual work with others. However, when abused, Internet usage can also take children away from doing important social activities such as homework, chores and spending time with family and friends. Michael A. Weinstein, professor of Political Science at Purdue University believes Internet users will “lose the savvy and skills and patience to conduct social relations in the corporeal world,” and that the Internet will intensify the negative effect television has already had on our social skills (Weinstein, 1995, as cited in Affonso, 1999). Furthermore, there is a serious concern involving the proliferation of inappropriate content, such as violence, bias, hate speech, profanity, and pornography. The Internet gives children an easy way to find information and it permits unwelcomed messages to find their way to children.
Because of the seriousness of the impact of pornography on child development, a few extra words about the topic must be mentioned. Pornography can be generally defined as erotic depictions intended to provoke a sexual response (Casanova, 2000). It can exist in many forms, including videos, films, still pictures, and even comics. Child pornography pictures and videos usually depict acts of sexual intercourse, sodomy, cunnilingus, and fellatio between children and between a child and an adult (Esposito, 1998). It is easy to see how child pornography harms the child and destroys the idea of his or her childhood. Since child pornography is an illegal underground industry, it is impossible to determine the number of children involved in its production. Consequently, pornography is rampant on the Internet because pedophiles can transmit and download an illegal picture anonymously from a source, which is unregulated, and thereby avoid law enforcement. Child pornography causes much harm through its use by pedophiles as a tool to destroy children’s inhibitions, teach the performance of sexual acts, and threaten or blackmail children, thereby furthering actual abuse (Esposito, 1998). Society has struggled to regulate pornographic sources and materials on the Internet, which are unregulated and thereby avoid law enforcement.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In today’s world this happens as well. However, other, more commonplace technologies have negative side effects to people’s physical health every day. Cell phones, small that they are in comparison to a nuclear reactor, give off radiation all the time. They use it to send signals to cell phone towers, but these waves can be very bad for humans.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Cell phones affect people in many physical ways. There have been many studies dedicated to finding if the use of cellphones can lead to cancer. This concept has been proved and disproved through the years as technology has improved and our understanding changes. Recent…
- 978 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Radiation is all over the place, and cannot be escaped. But the amount that one is exposed to can be lowered. Cell phones do not generate large amounts of radiation, but give off an amount similar to that of a large toaster oven. With over 300 million cell phone subscribers in the United States alone, it is not hard to see why this could cause a problem (CNN Health). Tissues in close contact to a radiation-emitting device will absorb radiation, so when one holds a cell phone near their face for an extended period of time, the radiation enters his/her body through the skin (National Cancer Institute). Over the last decade, research on radiation has increased tremendously, but there were no prior studies performed, especially on children. Through recent studies, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has listed cell phones as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” New studies, launched in 2010, are tracking individuals for twenty to thirty years monitoring their health related to their cell phone use (Cancer Risk).…
- 622 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Siddhartha Mukherjee, author of “Do Cellphones Cause Brain Cancer?” in the New York Times Magazine informs readers of many trials that attempt to link cellphone radiation to brain cancer. But concludes that as of now, there is not enough evidence to support that cellphones cause…
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the main reason cell phones might have the potential to harm us human beings are because of a form of electromagnetic radiation called radiofrequency energy. Electromagnetic radiation can be categorized in two types: ionizing and non-ionizing (National Cancer Institute). Here is why this is a problem, exposure to ionizing radiation is known to increase the risk of cancer. However, in regards to non-ionizing radiation, like microwaves and ovens, there is currently no evidence that relates non-ionizing radiation to a risk…
- 2095 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
AlOrainy, A. (2003). Recent research on mobile phone effects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Non-Ionizing Radiation at UNITEN.…
- 1466 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Over the past decade, the use of mobile phones has increased significantly. However, with every technological development comes some element of health concern, and cell phones are no exception. Recently, various studies have highlighted the negative effects of cell phone exposure on human health, and concerns about possible hazards related to cell phone exposure have been growing. This is a comprehensive, up-to-the-minute overview of the effects of cell phone exposure on human health. The types of cell phones and cell phone technologies currently used in the world are discussed in an attempt to improve the understanding of the technical aspects, including the effect of cell phone exposure on the…
- 9051 Words
- 37 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This article talks about how cell phones are not linked to cancer. According to Danish researchers, the biggest study ever consisting of 350,000 people found no evidence of any link. This concluded that people who have used a cell phone for a decade don’t have different cancer rates than those who have not. Last year, a different study found no connection between cell phones and cancer. But it showed a possible connection between heavy phone usage and glioma, a brain tumor that is rare but deadly. However, this information was not enough to support the case. That study of over 14,000 people in many countries, along with animal experiments, led to classifying electromagnetic energy from cell phones as possibly carcinogenic along with coffee and gasoline engine exhaust. But cell phones don’t issue the same radiation that is used in medical tests or found in radon soil so there might not be a risk. The Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Communications Commission have no evidence of cell phones being linked to cancer but people still have fears of getting it, although cancer rates have not risen since cell phones were introduced. Researchers have updated a recent study examining 358,403 cell phones users 30 years of age and older in Denmark from 1990 to 2007. They found that cell phone users did not have a higher risk of cancer than those without them. Cell phone users also aren’t more likely to develop a tumor in a part of the brain where phones are held against the head. About three-quarters of the world’s population use a cell phone. This makes it difficult for scientists to compare cancer rates between users and non-users. The advocacy group MobileWise said that the Danish study wasn’t enough to consider the long-term risk since brain tumors can take decades to develop. In about 30 other studies, those with brain tumors…
- 594 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The following paper will discuss the psychological and sociological impact of cellular technology. Cellular technology has seen rapid growth in technology and in personal use. Texting has now become the dominant means of communication and actual conversation skills are diminishing. Exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted from cellular devices has become a concern and is being studied from many various angles to determine actual health risks from cell phone use. Whether it is for…
- 18320 Words
- 74 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cellular phones are now an integral part of modern telecommunications. In many countries, over half the population use mobile phones and the market is growing rapidly. At the end of 2009, there were an estimated 4.6 billion subscriptions globally. In some parts of the world, mobile phones are the most reliable or the only phones available. The world now has over 5.6 billion mobile phone users. Cell phones emit radiofrequency energy, a form of non-ionizing or electromagnetic radiation, and tissues nearest to where the phone is held can absorb this energy. The majority of the radiofrequency energy emitted by a cell phone is absorbed by the hand and head of the user. The total energy absorbed is a function of the specific absorption rate (SAR), duration of use, and the manner in which the cell phone is used. In addition, people are concerned that cell phones might have the potential to cause certain types of cancer or other health problems. Possible damage in our tissues, increase in the risk of brain glioma and risk of tumors by heating the cells in the head and neck are three possible cancer-causing effects of radiofrequency (RF) energy of cell phones. The use of speaker mode or a hands-free device, a cell phone with a low SAR value, and reducing the amount of time spent on the cell phone are three ways to reduce RF exposure.…
- 603 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Pawl states in his editorial, “Cell phones are more dangerous than cigarettes!”, in Surgical Neurology, “The long term use of cell-phones was leading to brain tumors and was more dangerous to health than smoking cigarettes” (Pawl 445). To actually believe that over time the use of a cell phone is more harmful than the tobacco and nicotine inhaled by smoking is a shocker. Although the cell phone itself may not create and spark some sort of new cancer, it is said that cell phones do increase the chances for gaining other health problems (Pawl 445). Pawl also brought up something called EMF’s (electromagnetic fields). Electromagnetic fields can cause all sorts of problems to the human body from nausea, dizziness, headaches, etc. With this sort of exposure from a cell phone over a long period of time, even starting at a young age has a much greater risk. Also over time exposure can cause things such as ipsilateral, glioma, and acoustic neuroma (Pawl 445).…
- 1584 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Great resource explaining how mobiles phones are low power radio devices that transmit and receive radio frequency radiation. There is a concern that this might promote or induce cancer. So far there is no clear evidence from epidemiological studies of a relation between mobile phone use and mortality. The only established health hazard cited by independent groups comes from the use of mobile phones while driving. The risk is the same for a drunk driver and also when a person is using a cell phone can cause an accident.…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Mobile phones release microwave frequencies and other radiations that are the same as those used in radar and your microwave oven. These radiations impose great danger to our body and its functions. Finland's Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority reports that one hour of exposure to mobile phone radiation can cause human cells to shrink. While the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry reports, that microwave frequencies emerging from cell phones cause cancer and other diseases by interfering with cellular DNA. Many scientists have proved that these radiations encourage the human cells to age quickly. Moreover, Italian scientists have recently demonstrated that cell phone radiation makes cancerous cells grow aggressively. Also, some note that even tiny doses…
- 1006 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
We would like to start by acknowledging the authors of other radiation textbooks from whose insights and presentation ideas we have benefited both directly and indirectly. We are thankful to our guide Mr.Vinoth for his continuous support and encouragement to carry out this project. Mobile users are the primary incentives for our project. Our sincere thanks to each and every mobile users who expressed their difficulties ,barriers and frustrations towards the radiations emitted from the mobile phones.…
- 2798 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Previous independent studies into the health effects of mobile phone radiation have found it may have some effect on the human body, such as heating up body tissue and causing headaches and nausea, but no study that could be independently repeated has proved that radiation had permanent harmful effects.…
- 496 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays