The Fashoda Incident, also known as Fashoda Crisis, was the climax of a dispute between France and Britain, who were vying for territory in Africa, and both claimed control over a Sudanese outpost. At the end of the nineteenth century, the European powers were competing for control of Africa, hoping to extend their territory into the Sudan and the Great Lakes region. As the French extended eastward from the Congo, the British expanded south from Egypt. The disputes arose from the common desire of each country to link up its disparate colonial possessions in Africa. Great Britain’s aim was to link Uganda to Egypt via a railway from the Cape of Good Hope to Cairo, while France, by pushing eastward from the west coast, hoped to extend its dominion across Central Africa and the Sudan.
In July 1898, a French expedition arrived at the Sudanese outpost of Fashoda on the Nile. After British General Herbert Kitchener's victory at Omdurman, he proceeded to Fashoda on orders from the British prime minister. Kitchener claimed the entire Nile valley for Great Britain, and, after several days, both parties withdrew peacefully. The solution to the conflicting claims was later worked out by diplomats in Britain and France, and it reflected the fact that Britain had an army in Khartoum, while France had no appreciable forces in the vicinity. France renounced all rights to the Nile basin and the Sudan in return for a guarantee of its position in West Africa. The Fashoda incident is seen as the high point of Anglo–French tension in Africa.
Berlin conference A conference held in Berlin, Germany in 1884 to 1885 in order to regulate the trade and European colonialism in Africa during the New Imperialism period. The conference was held following a request by Portugal and organized by Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of the German Empire.
During the 70s and 80s of the 19th century, the European powers were interested in Africa to get trades rights and access to the valuable resources, such as gold, timber, land markers and labor powers. The major competition was between the British, Portuguese, French and Belgians. The participant countries at the Conference were: Germany, Austria – Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, UK, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden – Norway and The Ottoman Empire. They wanted to work out policy for the division of Africa. The US was against the Berlin Conference because it didn’t want to be considered as a colonial power.
The main points achieved were:
- To end slavery and the slave trades.
- The Congo Free States came under King Leopold’s control (Belgium).
- All the European powers were given trade rights in the Congo Basin and other territories.
-The Niger River and Congo River were to be free for ship traffic.
- If any of the participants claimed a part of the African coast, they had to notify the other participant.
-The principle of Effectivity was one of the outcomes of the Berlin Conference. According to this principle each colonial power had to :
- have treaties with the local leader
- fly their flag
- establish an administration
-create a police force
As a consequences of the Berlin Conference “The scramble for Africa” speeded up.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
abundance of copper, rubber and ivory were appealing to him. He initially pledged to promote…
- 804 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
conflict between the two. Seeing that they could possibly gain an advantage here, the French…
- 4603 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The three decades following the Berlin conference were chaotic as European powers competed to occupy and colonize Africa. Europe would be profiting off the resources that they collected from their reaction to far much weaker subordinate African colonies. As Europe’s wealth amassed, Africa’s wealth approached its end. It was soon Eu European intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason…
- 850 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Because of the Berlin Conference in Europe, the scramble for African land ended up colonizing inhabited areas in Africa, destroying native nations and their traditional culture. During this time, African natives had many different reactions. Some wanted to cooperate peacefully, others wanted to withstand European pressure, but most of all, most Africans wanted to react violently and rebel against the Europeans.…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Berlin Conference of 1986-1985 was Africa's undoing in many ways. During the conference, European Nations decided which lands in Africa they would take over. However, this was done without the presence of an African representative. The race of these European powers to colonize and occupy Africa is termed, the “Scramble for Africa”. Africa’s inhabitants responded with anger and violence as is shown in the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth document. On the other hand, some tried to come to an agreement or to keep peace with the Europeans, which is seen in the second and third document; and the first document shows the Europeans attempted to gain control without conflict. Due to the Africans lack of modern weapons, they were often defeated.…
- 283 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The 19th century was one of the most important time periods that helped shape the world into what it is today. Western European powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and France, strongly believed in the notion that in order to gain more dominant global power, they would have to conquer new lands across the globe and exploit the territories’ resources. Throughout the early and mid 1800s, the nations of Western Europe upheld imperialism, conquering and exploiting foreign lands in Asia and South America. Unfortunately, one major problem remained in the way of global imperialism; Africa, a continent rich in resources, could not be infiltrated because of strong resistance by the natives, foreign disease, and difficult terrain. Nevertheless, in the 1880s, Western Europe became more advanced and had the capability of conquering Africa; the scramble for Africa was on. In 1884-85, the Berlin Conference was held in Germany; this was a diplomatic meeting where the nations of Western Europe divided Africa among themselves. Each nation was given separate holdings in Africa, and the issue of land in Africa was solved. However, a major problem overlooked by the Europeans was that Africa had no say in the Berlin Conference. This resulted in many problems that would terrorize Africa for years to come; because Africans had no say in the dividing of their land, religious and political strife arose, and places such as the Congo faced detrimental and uninvited changes.…
- 893 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
in 1880, Europeans controlled 10% of Africa; by 1914, controlled all except Liberia & Ethiopia; the Berlin Conference established the rules among European powers for carving up Africa…
- 1304 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Simply put, in order for Europe to support its’ thirst for resources, it had to take over African countries such as Angola (Background Essay). As a matter of fact, Angola contained resources such as cotton, oils, coffee, and sugar to which Europe used for its’ fabric and food processing industries. Hence why Angola, later, became a European colony due to the economic benefits its resources provided for the Industrial Revolution (Doc D). Another snippet of proof to support that Europe required more resources, includes a chart adapted from Trevor Lloyd’s, The British Empire, which demonstrates that between the years 1854 and 1900, Great Britain spent approximately 2 million more pounds on African imports, illustrating that Great Britain was, indeed, in need of more African resources (Doc E). With all this evidence in mind, European nations such as Great Britain were definitely in need of more resources to which Africa was plentiful…
- 952 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Between the 1870s and 900, Africa faced European imperialist aggression, diplomatic…
- 191 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
"The French in West Africa." The French in West Africa. Accessed February 29, 2016. http://courses.wcupa.edu/jones/his312/lectures/fren-occ.htm.…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The British perspective is present with the British Consul watching English ships crossing the Egyptian desert that had to go around the tip of Africa before. The Suez was built by French engineers, and although the English became a major shareholder in the Canal, the French retained control.7 British troops later protected the Canal as it was essential to British trade and colonization. There is understated rivalry here, but on the other hand, the modern European nations are shown co-operating on colonial and economic enterprises.8 According to Hsuan L. Hsu, “When Ferdinand de Lesseps acquired permission from Egyptian authorities to begin construction in 1859, Britain attempted to intervene, perceiving the canal as a potential source of imperial…
- 150 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Africa in the mid to late 1800s was still uncharted territory according to European countries. They all wanted the resources Africa had to offer, and were willing to do whatever it took to get them. Eventually after thousands upon thousands of deaths, Africa would be divided up into different colonies. There were many different causes of death in Africa, from diseases to people killing each other. Many countries wanted in, more people wanted them out.…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
European nations were interested in spreading its colony to Africa. There were both positive and…
- 882 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The French and European powers wanted more direct control of their colonies during the 18th and 19th centuries than they did in the 15th and 16th centuries. This new period of Imperialism, led to the Europeans demanding more power over the political, economic, and social lives of all people. The Europeans looked at the Africans as not being able to handle the complex ideals of running a country. They wanted to make the land of Africa to have an economy that benefitted the European economy. They wanted the people already there to begin to follow their customs and traditions.…
- 505 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* A meeting between European officials in which the distribution of Africa to Europe control was decided. Sought to bring an end to the scramble for Africa.…
- 771 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays