Preview

The Federal Court System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Federal Court System
A court system is created to determine the innocent and the guilty when a conflict arises. In many cases it is convicting a criminal for a crime that has been committed. The system entitles everyone to a fair trial no matter what the case and in each trial it is the team that is prosecuting that most prove that if the accused is guilty. Not the accused having to prove their innocence. The victim in most cases looks to see that justice is served to the criminal. The accused looks to try and get another chance in life and to make the court believe that they can change. In the United States criminal justice system, there are two main court systems, the state and federal court system. Within these two systems, there are several levels of courts. …show more content…

District Courts hear every type of federal case, whether it is a civil or criminal case. Each district can have more judges, and it covers either the whole state or a part of it. There are two groups of district court judges, "regular service" and "senior status." They have the same power and their jobs are secured for their entire lives (as stipulated under Article III Section I of the U.S. Constitution). The only difference is that senior judges, because they were on the bench for at least ten years they can take lighter caseloads and may choose what types of cases they hear. District Court judges are often assisted by Magistrate Judges. Magistrates are not judges that have their place secured. But, they are auxiliary officers (appointed under Article I of the Constitution) who handle certain kinds of tasks sent by District Judges. Magistrates can take pleas of "not guilty" in felony criminal charges; they also frequently handle discovery disputes, misdemeanor trials, settlement negotiations, and hearings to calculate damages. Their orders can be appealed to the District Judge who initially had the …show more content…

Instead, parties have to wait for the case to be closed in the District Court, and afterwards raise all the appeals at a single time. Circuit Court Judges sit in random panels of three judges for each case, unlike District Court Judges, who sit alone for their cases. "Sitting by designation" is the process when, on occasion, the Chief Judge of a Circuit invites a District Court Judge or a judge from another circuit, to temporarily sit on a panel of 3 judges to hear one or more appeals. When sitting by designation, a District Court Judge may not review his own decisions that he made earlier. The decisions of the Circuit Court are connected to the district courts within that circuit. This develops the uniformity of law in each circuit, even though the circuits might disagree strongly on points of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The four levels of state courts are as follows: The trial court of limited jurisdiction, the trial court of general jurisdiction which hears various kinds of cases, the intermediate appellate courts with a fixed maximum and minimum term of imprisonment and only hears appeals and the state courts of last report or Supreme Court of the state.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of Magistrates and Jurors are similar in ways of characteristics needed; for example both must be aged 18-70 and those who are in the police or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. The selection process is however very different, the Lord Chancellor will appoint lay magistrates on behalf of the queen whereas jurors are selected by an electoral register for the area in which the court is situated and is done by a computer at the Central Summoning Bureau. Lay Magistrates are unpaid, part time volunteers whereas jurors are also unpaid but may be unwilling however failure to attend can result in prosecution or a fine. Magistrates can claim a small allowance and compensation for lost earnings. Both parties make their decision based on facts, such as guilt or innocence in trials whereby the difference is that Magistrates can sentence the defendant whereas jurors cannot. Both are used in the right for a ''trial by our peers'', ordinary people with experience of real life situations. Jurors will serve for a period of usually two weeks as apposed to Magistrates who will serve part time for different periods of time. Although lay magistrates and district judges do a very similar job there are many differences between how they work, their qualifications and employment. Lay magistrates, otherwise known as Justice of the Peace sit in magistrate's courts, generally in groups of three, whereas judges usually sit alone. 1999 there were 90, of whom about 20% were women, whereas there are an almost equal number of men and women magistrates, showing that judges are not a mirror image of trial by ones peers such as lay people. Judges are members of the professional judiciary who are legally qualified and salaried, working…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They hear preliminary hearings for all criminal cases, but they then transfer indictable offences, some either way offences that are outside their sentencing powers, or are particularly complex, and applications for bail to the crown court. Magistrates also accompany circuit judges in hearing appeals against conviction/sentencing from the magistrates in the crown court. having the magistrates in the appeals helps them to gain further knowledge on how laws should be interpreted and which sentences are appropriate for which crimes so the same mistakes are not repeated.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States has two types of court structures which are called a dual court system. Each of the judicial systems has their separate systems one for each of the states and the other for the Federal system. The U.S. Supreme is the only place where the two judicial systems connect.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | b. The county judge is primarily a judicial officer, trying cases in county court. This is especially true in urban counties.…

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certain courthouses contain a certain circuit, and district court cases are heard in these courthouses. The courts of appeals have appellate jurisdiction, meaning that they do not hear the case first. Instead, the district courts decide…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Georgia's Court System

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Magistrate courts are county courts that hear minor criminal offenses and civil claims involving amounts of $15,000 or less and issue warrants. Magistrate court is the first resort for many civil disputes that may include bad checks, county ordinance violations, landlord/tenant cases, and dispossessories/evictions. In criminal matters magistrates hold preliminary hearings; issue search warrants to law enforcement and also warrants for the arrest of a particular person. No jury trials are held in magistrate court. Rather than by an attorney, civil cases are often argued by the person themselves. The chief magistrate is either elected or appointed in each county. Other magistrates are appointed by the chief magistrate.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Texas, all levels of Judges are elected to the individual court positions through a partisan ballot. Each candidate for…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “There are 94 trial district level courts and 13 Court of Appeals that sit below the Supreme Court.” (Court Role and Structure) “The trial district courts are state and locally funded and have general jurisdiction over cases that involve juries,…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system in America has been around since the middle of the 1600’s and has played a crucial role in the development of how things are done when it comes to the criminal justice side. From today’s federal court and our typical state court, these dual court systems came about from a mutual agreement presented from our nation’s founders. In the last 200 years, states’ rights have gradually waned relative to the power of the federal government, but the dual-court system still exists. Even today, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts get involved in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statutes (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nevada State Court System

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judicial system in the United States is made up by the Federal court and State court system and each court is responsible for hearing certain types of cases. The major goals of the both court systems are to solving legal disputes and vindicating legal rights. The State court system is made up with the two sets of trial courts that are the trial court of limited jurisdiction and trial court of general jurisdiction.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States Criminal Justice System includes step by step processes that must be implemented when dealing with criminal arrest and prosecution. When it comes to murder cases, the criminal justice system has several steps and protocols to ensure a fair trial which upholds constitutional law and provides a guilty or innocent verdict without reasonable doubt.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Issues

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the issues facing the court system today is judges are not able to see many cases because of their administrative role. Judges spend the majority of their time “papering budgets, scheduling cases, supervising employees, and maintaining court records” (Robinson, 2009, pg. 208, para 5). The courthouse employee’s work together getting cases dispensed as quickly as possible. Some of these cases are dismissed before even being seen because of how many cases there are. Many of the minor cases are plea bargained so that the…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The rule did not create new courts but merely designated Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts (known as first-level courts because they are at the first and lowest level in a hierarchy of courts with increasing jurisdiction and powers and in the appeals process). Upon the effectivity of the rule on October 1, 2008, only 22 first-level courts were designated to act as SCCs throughout the country, but now all…

    • 1319 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays