The federal government has control of too many things. Including the distribution of coin and money and the right to declare war. In recent year, proponents argue federal powers have grown to untenable level, threatening individual liberties and making states rights that's much …show more content…
It says in the article (which article, again please cite your sources) “supporters of the states’ rights argue that states need greater power to prevent the federal government from lording over them and imposing policies they oppose.” This means the states want more power, so the federal government does not take control over them. If the national government had more power they could divide the powers evenly through federal,states and themselves. Now people (what people? Where are the sources here?) say on the other hand the national government has too much power. Now it says “the federal power has grown to untenable levels, threatening individual liberties which leads to federal abuse of powers.” This is saying, if the national government Didn't have so much power they could worry about trying to keep everyone equal and not one overpowering