Preview

The Fourth Amendment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8067 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fourth Amendment
Please read: a personal appeal from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales Read now

Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Bill of Rights in the National Archives.
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. It was adopted as a response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, which is a type of general search warrant, in the American Revolution. Search and seizure (including arrest) should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court, usually by a law enforcement officer, who has sworn by it. The Fourth Amendment applies to the states by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Text
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[1] History of adoption
English law
See also: Entick v. Carrington

John Wilkes authored pamphlets critical of the British government. Like many other areas of American law, the Fourth Amendment finds its roots in English legal doctrine. Sir Edward Coke, in Semayne 's case (1604), famously stated: "The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose."[2] Semayne 's Case acknowledged that the King did not have unbridled authority to intrude on his subjects ' dwellings but recognized that government agents were permitted to conduct searches and seizures under certain conditions when their purpose was lawful and a warrant had been obtained.[3] The 1760s saw a growth in the intensity of litigation against



References: 9. ^ Lasson (1937), p. 66 10 12. ^ Article X of the Virginia Declaration of Rights, Levy (1995), p. 161 13. ^ Levy (1995), pp. 162–164 14 21. ^ Tennessee v. Garner 471 U.S. 1 (1985) 22 40. ^ Andrews v. Fuoss, 417 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2005). 41. ^ Flippo v. West Virginia, 528 U.S. 11 (1999); California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991) 42. ^ Carroll at 162 43 54. ^ INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984) 55 59. ^ Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987); United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001) 60. ^ Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921) 61 63. ^ Oliver, 466 U.S. 170, 179 (1984) 64

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    a. Arizona v. R. Joseph Gant, Supreme Court of the United States, 2009 (April 21, 2009)…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 478 U.S. 186 Bowers v. Hardwick Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0478_0186_ZS.html…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Signifance: The 4th amendment prohibits the unlawful search and seizure of resident belonging to citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheetum Case Summary

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment is intended to protect the security a man relies upon when he places himself or his property within a constitutionally protected area, be it his home or his office,…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As is the case with the majority of the legal pronouncements that comprise the Bill of Rights, the Fourth Amendment is based on the English common law that was extant in England in the 1600s and 1700s. In fact, the Fourth Amendment was directly inspired by three British legal cases – two of which were adjudicated in England and one that was tried in the American colonies in the 1760s.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shepardizing Pa201

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: United States of America v. James L. Crowder, 543 F.2d 312 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jerry Alfred WHITWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.,…

    • 2825 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011). Retrieved from thecocklebur.com Academic database .…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights which was established in the seventeenth and eighteenth century English common law. Aside from the rest of the amendments in the Bill of Rights the Fourth Amendment can be traced back to a strong public reaction from some cases back in the 1760s. Two of these cases happened in England and one case happened in the colonies. These cases involved some pamphleteers who would pass out pamphlets to the public in order to spread their word around. These pamphlets however ridiculed the king and his ministers. After finding this out the king issued warrants to have the pamphleteer’s homes ransacked and stripped of all their books and papers. Even back then the pamphleteers knew that their rights were violated and fought back. They stated that the searches were against them, similar to a “personal attack” rather than an attack on their information they held within their homes.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Peak, 2006)."…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I enjoy reading your post. I would say that one of the reasons the 4th Amendment is so important is that it is reflective of the Colonists' own experiences. The Colonists were outraged on many levels that British soldiers could enter their homes, seize their belongings, or search their property without any probable cause or authentic paperwork. The fact that warrant-less and groundless searches became so prevalent is one reason why the 4th Amendment strictly states that justification and authentication must accompany all searches and investigation of property and belongings. Another I would say that the 4th Amendment is important is that it represents a fundamental right of a person accused of wrongdoing in a legal sense. The 4th Amendment…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    403 U.S. 217; 91 S. Ct. 1940; 29 L. Ed. 2d 438; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Schenk v. U.S., 249 U.S. 47 (1919); 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470, 1919 U.S. 2223…

    • 3348 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since there are CDA and SDA in Hong Kong at the same time, it is important for us to identify the differences between them. Also, as Boyle (2002) said that, “statutory derivative action is intended to reform defects in the common law shareholder’s derivative action.” (P.1) Therefore, it is necessary for us to discuss how the extent on SDA will fill the defects and lead to increased shareholder protection in Hong Kong.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays