Preview

The Framers Of The Constitution In The 20th Century

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
855 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Framers Of The Constitution In The 20th Century
Until the 20th century it has been understood that the framers of the constitution were “for the people”. Revisionists of the 20th century are painting an entirely different picture. They “argued that the Constitutional Convention was dominated by an elite and that the Constitution itself is an instrument written to protect elite interests.” (Fisk 2014) This could not be further from the truth. The framers are responsible for creating the first ever republican government, did not grant nobility, and creating a constitution with a just bill of rights. The first words of the Preamble of the Constitution are “We the people” not “we the rich”, and with this phrase it is clear that the constitution was written to protect all the people of the …show more content…
A job of a lawyer is to protect the people; they are driven by the pursuit of justice and fairness for all of humanity. So to indict them because of their profession would be a desperate move. It would be like saying a doctor wants his or her patients to be sick when the whole idea of a doctor, is to keep people healthy. The framers of the Constitution took a bold move in creating a republican government in which the people had a say. All other “civilized” countries at that time were monarchies. It is clear that the framers intended for fair representation of all people. “the House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second year by the People of the Several States.” (Constitution, Article I, sections 2 and 3) the government is being set up so that the people have a voice, giving the people power. “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” (Bill of Rights, Amendment X) this amendment gives further power to the people. “the United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican form of government, shall protect each of them against invasion” (Constitution, Article IV, section 4) Not only are they going to set up that type of government they will preserve it. If they hadn’t wanted the people to have a say …show more content…
For this reason they decided to create a presidency. “the Executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the Term of four years, and, together with the Vice President” (Constitution, Article II, section 1) This is a huge change because a president is elected by the people based off of his or her qualifications and has a definite term while a king is simply born into his position and rules indefinitely. This kind of a rule clearly benefits the common man because he could rise to the position of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article, Framing the Constitution, Charles Beard had a very strong opinion on the Constitution and the motives of the framers. He believed that this document was written by the rich landowners, creditors, merchants, public bondholders, and lawyers, whose motives were to protect their wealth and property. Beard said that the reason the framers were against having majority rule was because they didn't want the majority to "overthrow" the rich framers of the time. This critical and different opinion of the Constitution and its framers is contrary to most modern belief. The framers had the "best minds" and mainly advocated the idea of "self-government". The idea of federalism in a republic was an innovative system.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s article, Framing the Constitution, alleges the members of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were “disinterested” in providing basic rights for citizens. He stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were only concerned in improving their own economic well–being and personal agendas. Therefore, providing information of the events that led up to the Philadelphia Convention and an overview of the Constitution will dismiss his statements, and state his article was a self-serving, conspiracy theory.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is generally understood that the United States is built upon the principles of democracy, in which the majority consensus of the citizens helps to define the shape of issues or elections. However, in assuming that the Constitution - the document upon which such practices are founded – is inherently democratic is only partially accurate. Indeed, it has been frequently argued that the U. S. Constitution is representative of the rule of law from a federation as opposed to a pure democracy; in a federation, elections occur among the majority of the citizenry but this process results in elected officials who then determine the direction of the country. In short, a federation transforms a democracy from the rule of the many back into the rule of the few, with the “few” in this sense being the elected officials selected through an elections process.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is a very highly recognized document. There are several factors that contribute to it process.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e. To set new tax rates in the colonies in response to a request from Parliament…

    • 1761 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elected public servants, police officers, the military and other public sector employees take an oath of alliance to the Constitution and not a person when they are hired or start their jobs. Why is this important?…

    • 3043 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison states that a republican government “derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people”. Furthermore, all citizens…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not really agree with Beard. It seems like the framers really did do a good job at protecting the rights of average citizens. Especially considering how long the constitution has lasted and how much changed in regard to everyday life has since then. They did an incredible job at making the constitution a long lasting and effective document. Beard was the opposite of Roche. I think that they wrote these documents as a debate, and that Roche most likely won. There is more evidence to support his theories, especially since we can see how well the constitution has worked since its creation. Also there were many members of the Constitutional Conventions who were not wealthy land owners and there were many wealthy men who opposed the Constitution. Because of this, I would say that Beard was most likely mistaken.…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the death Franklin Delano Roosevelt, which occurred during his fourth elected term as president, the United States Congress passed the twenty-second amendment, which put into writing a previously unwritten tradition of the presidency. This tradition, set in place by George Washington in 1797 and further cemented by Thomas Jefferson, had remained in place for 144 years before it was finally broken. While a few previous presidents had tried to run for a third term, it was only FDR who succeeded. Grant tried to run but lost his party’s nomination to Garfield, Grover Cleveland attempted a third term but could not garner enough support, Theodore Roosevelt lost to Woodrow Wilson when Theodore attempted…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is one of the most developed countries in the world and a huge reason is because of the United States government. The agreement under which the government had been operating since 1781 was the Articles of Confederation, but it was replaced by the Constitution in 1789. This change was required due to the need for a stronger Federal Government. It is astonishing that the Constitution, which was created by a group of brilliant leaders still prevails to this day and serves the purpose of running the government. These men created a government from scratch, but many people were not convinced as to how long this new government would last. However, over the years it has been proven that the Constitution has been able to adapt and provide the…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many principles from the U.S constitution. One of them is federalism, federalism in the U.S constitution was divided power between the central governments and states. Federalism is a system based on democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and state governments, creating a federation. The constitution came up with amendments and the Tenth Amendment specifically is made for those powers not to be delegated to the United States by the Constitution. The national and state government has different powers. Some of the examples that the national government does is they have provide an army and navy also make treaties and conduct foreign policies, they make laws that are needed to start these powers and etc. The state government is different, they conduct elections, establish local governments, use powers the constitution doesn’t pass on to the national government or that the state doesn’t use. They also did share powers like collecting taxes, built roads, established courts, and many more. Both governments didn’t allow discrimination and provided equal protection for everyone. The Bill of Rights controlled only the federal government. The states, because of this could offer or choose not to offer the protections by the first ten amendments. After the Civil War the federal government fixed that the southern states shouldn’t be allowed without guarantees. The states that had succeeded had to guarantee black suffrage and the running of the Fourteenth Amendment which was equal protection in their new state constitutions before they…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the ratification of the constitution had a big impact in American history people rights were not revised, they stayed the same before the ratification and after. However it did change politically; establishing branches of government and issues between foreign countries. Also it changed economically, issues over currency and debate over parties. Therefore the ratification of the constitution was a turning point in American history.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we were to look back at the ideas and thoughts of some of the…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    200 years after the Constitution was written and ratified, Most Americans were terrified of the Constitution becoming too powerful. Many people think that this document has always been valued, but this is not true. When this document was written in 1787 and submitted to the states for ratification, it started to become months of violent and often harsh debates. In April of 1789, George Washington was under oath as President, even though two states still had not approved the Constitution. When ratifying the U.S. Constitution there were major arguments for each side in the debate. The two opposing side that were involved in this debate were known as the Feudalist and the Anti-Feudalist. The Anti- Feudalist were against ratifying the Constitution because they feared that the Constitution would become too powerful. On the other hand the Feudalist wanted to have a new strong central government.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One reason we shouldn't ratify the Constitution is because it will be filled with the elite class.This speech made by Amos Singletary says that the rich will overcome the farmers and the middle class of people to become the highest position, and then this man will be a tyrant, like King George was."And then they will swallow up all of us little folks."This means that not only will we have the rich ruling over…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays