Preview

The Function of the Dream Scenes in Richard III

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3049 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Function of the Dream Scenes in Richard III
Mubashir Sultan (014532302)
Maria Salenius
The Tudors: Fact and Fiction (ENG243)
24 April 2015
The Function of the Dream Scenes in Richard III
Richard III is claimed to be one of Shakespeare’s earliest plays (Lull). The drama can be seen either as a stand-alone or as part of a tetralogy, sharing interlinking elements with the Henry VI series (Grene). Due to its status as an early play, Richard III provides an exemplary window into Shakespeare’s design as a playwright, especially in relation to the presentation of characters, inner-psyche, and death. The dream scenes (I.IV; V.III) are of particular importance, as they are rich in content and can be instrumental in highlighting how Shakespeare deals with the above. The aim of this essay is to discuss the dream sequences in Richard III and investigate their functions. This is carried out under the following sections: dreams as a contrast between characters, as foreshadowing death, and as a portrayal of the divided self.

DREAMS AS A CONTRAST BETWEEN CHARACTERS
Of the few dreams presented in Richard III, Shakespeare conveys Clarence’s with great poetic richness. This is almost hinted at by the Keeper, as he interrupts Clarence during his lengthy descriptions, highlighting Shakespeare’s own interest in a topic as compared to achieving a sense of balance within a play, and asks ‘Had you such leisure in the time of death. To gaze upon the secrets of the deep?’ (I.IV.34). Clarence’s dream also parallels Richard’s in Act V before the Battle of Bosworth Field. A dichotomy - Good vs. Evil - is inferred by comparing these dreams, which is further reinforced through Richmond’s character. Richard progressively supresses any inkling of emotional reasoning for the atrocious acts he has committed. However, Clarence does not posses such a skill set and his haunted by his past. As Clarence depicts his journey to hell at length, the Keeper who is afraid to hear it told, asks ‘Awaked you not in this sore agony?’ (I.IV.42). Clarence’s



Cited: Grene, N. Shakespeare 's Serial History Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Lull, J. 'Introduction. ' The New cambridge Shakespeare King Richard III. Ed. J. Lull. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 1-42. Shakespeare, W. King Richard III. Ed. J. Lull. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 1 scene 4 of “King Richard III”, Shakespeare explores the concept of free will clashing with Providentialism through the debate between Clarence and the two Murderers. Shakespeare juxtaposes Clarence’s dream with his murder in order to affirm the value of Providentialism and the Great Chain of Being which underpinned Elizabethan hierarchical society. On wakening from his dream, Clarence describes the torment of his soul in Hell at the behest of Warwick and the murdered Prince Edward who, “dabbled in blood” demands that the furies “take him in torment”. Clarence accepts his crimes and the punishment which is to be his as a just outcome of Providentialism, praying only that God “spare my guiltless wife and children”. This is immediately juxtaposed with the entrance of the two Murderers who, in their decision to murder a Prince, represent the rising power of secularism and free will. Shakespeare explores this dichotomy in Clarence’s pleas for his life; firstly he appeals to their secular greed, promising that “my brother Gloucester…shall reward you” for his life and, when this fails, asks if they “will war with God” by murdering him. Shakespeare’s use of emotive language such as “beastly, savage, devilish” draws attention to the crisis of…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many of the plays by William Shakespeare, the central character goes through internal and external changes that ultimately shake their foundations to the core. Numerous theories have been put forth to explain the sequence of tragedies Shakespeare wrote during this period by linking it to some experience of melancholy, anger, despair, and the antagonist 's ultimate fall from grace in their lust for power. But such theories overlook the fact that it is in this very same period and in the same tragic works that portray the heights to which human nature can rise and fall in its purest and noblest, if not happiest terms. Surely the creation of so much light alongside the darkness and the perfection of the artistic medium through which Shakespeare gives them expression argues against the idea that the greedy side of human nature is his chief concern. His efforts to portray human life in its rarest form and not only the dark depths, but also the treasure rooms of our being. He tries to pierce beneath the superficial motives and forces of surface behavior, social, and cultural expressions and to the deeper levels of individual character and human nature. Shakespeare then places these aspects of human existence in their true relation to the wider field of universal life. In relation to the tragic hero, there are many similarities between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare 's plays the central characters ' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare 's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero 's fall from grace.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Richard III and Looking For Richard directly relate to historical and social contexts respectively, social drawing on historical’s challenge to the context in which it was written. Shakespeare’s play was crafted in a difficult time of political and religious adherence. Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard focuses on his devilish and Machiavellian nature. Machiavelli’s The Prince teaches that an adept ruler should aim to achieve power at any cost. Richard is a Machiavel; he calls himself a devil, ‘Thus like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word.’…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jane Eyre

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our interest in the parallels between King Richard III and Looking For Richard is further enhanced by consideration of the marked differences in textual form. Evaluate this statement in the light of your Comparative Study of King Richard III and Looking For Richard.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diction In Richard III

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Act I Scene I, Richard’s brother Clarence is sent to the tower, the prison, by King Henry. Richard meets him in the tower and talks with him about his imprisonment, blaming it all on the King’s wife. In reality, Richard was indirectly responsible for the imprisonment of Clarence by starting rumors. Richard wanted Clarence in prison because he was in the way of Richard’s way to the throne. However, it does not end with Clarence’s imprisonment. Instead, Richard blames everything on the queen and promises to free Clarence. Thus gaining Clarence’s trust. While Clarence is in prison, he has a terrible dream foreshadowing his death. Following the dream, two murderers come to Clarence on Richard’s behalf. However, Clarence refuses to believe that Richard would do such thing because they were brothers and Richard had sworn his loyalty to him. After some debate, the murderers kill Clarence. It is evident in this scene that Richard used words to gain Clarence’s trust, but then broke it, resulting in his death. Clarence’s death was exactly what Richard wanted as he was in his way to the…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clarence’s dream commenced with he had fled from the London Tower, then he recalled the war of roses with Richard on the deck of…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard III is an historical play written by William Shakespeare during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, depicting the contentious rise to power of King Richard III of England and his short reign as King. Richard III is the final play in a cycle of eight plays written by Shakespeare dramatizing English history from 1398 to 1485. The theme of villainy is intricately explored throughout the play as one of its main themes. Shakespeare effectively explores the theme of villainy through the use of dramatic techniques such as character soliloquies and literary techniques such as symbolism. These techniques enable Shakespeare’s ideas of villainy to be developed and explored, which…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii Conscience

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attack of "conscience" that King Richard suffers in Act 5, Scene 5 of Shakespeare's Richard III (133-157) can be seen as the psychological climax of the drama, one that is critical to both Richard's development as a character and the play's ultimate success. Richard's struggle to reconcile the many different roles he attempts to play into one unified self, reflected in the tone and composition of his speech, adds depth and humanity to his character; at the same time, his ultimate failure to maintain his "self-made" identity simplifies the play in a way that allows the author to satisfy his audience by punishing the villain and reaffirming the world views that Richard's character appears to challenge (Luxon). While examining his own vision of himself, Richard finds his identity at a breaking point, and is forced to rely on the very ideas he used for his own advantage to judge himself. As the king, who seemed to be above the "afflict[ion] of "coward conscience" (5.5.133) is overwhelmed by the many different conceptions of who he is that are presented in the play, the audience cannot help but feel a mixture of sympathy and relief.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Much Ado and Richard Iii

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Shakespeare, William, P.A. Daniel, and Charles Praetorius. Richard III. London: Produced by C. lllllPraetorius, 1889. Print.…

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Doty, Jeffrey S. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, “Popularity,” and the Early Modern Public Sphere.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61.2 (Summer 2010): 185-205. Project MUSE. Web. 09 Sept. 2010.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet is generally regarded as Shakespeare’s magnum opus, sometimes it is even referred as the highest literary product of human genius. Critics have always been argued on the interpretation of Hamlet and even after more than 400 years, yet these argues still going strong. One of the most controversial that topic for critics since the beginning is the interpretation of the third act of Hamlet, where many critics themselves baffle because normal interpretations will make Hamlet subsequent actions irrational and impossible to explain. Many will use insanity to explain Hamlet actions. However, we will presume that Hamlet is staying sane throughout the course of the story. This paper is an attempt at interpreting the purpose and significant of…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Elizabethan era, power was seen as a very important part of society due to the hierarchical structure. In Shakespeare’s “Richard III”, power is represented through the position of King. The desire for power is Richard’s central motivation, and to get power, he must become the King…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays