Preview

The Gas Man Cometh

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
894 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Gas Man Cometh
“THE GAS MAN COMETH” The documentary, “Gas Land”, by Josh Fox, is a film about the problems with contaminated groundwater due to excessive and unregulated natural gas extraction across the country. In the film, Fox travels all over to talk to many people who have rented out their land to natural gas companies, only to get contaminated water and no help from any company or organization with the problems that ensue. Fox uses many techniques in his film to get across his point that America should not be subjected into a wasteland because of poor industry ethics and unregulated polluting of our water sources. By building his appeals, especially to ethos, as well as arranging many elements of the film, Fox creates a very staunch argument. Fox plays a lot on his “average guy” mentality that portrays him as no expert with any bias, but instead, a concerned citizen who really likes nature and America the way it is right now. He creates this ethos persona in order to convince his viewers that he has no hidden agenda to push, and he is no different than them in the way he lives his life. Adding onto his relatable persona, Fox tells his life story of growing up in Pennsylvania on a small piece of land surrounded by forests – prime gas extraction land. When natural gas companies approach him and offer him 100,000 dollars to rent his twenty acres of land to them, the purpose of the documentary becomes clear: to find out why they want the land so badly, and what it truly means when he takes the money and hands over his property for drilling purposes. As mentioned above, Fox establishes a steady pattern of ethos maintenance throughout his documentary by repeatedly using the language and tone of an average American, who specifically doesn’t have any exclusive knowledge, except for what he was able to find out by his own research. This continually balances out the scare factor of the claims that Fox brings up, and puts his audience’s guard down in order for them to listen

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Methane can likewise prompt ground water bringing about a genuine danger to individuals' wellbeing, something that must be more controlled and checked upon. As indicated by Dictionary.com, a narrative is a motion picture, or a TV or radio program that gives a verifiable record or report, comprising official pieces and sources. There are constantly two sides to a story and afterward there is a truth. "Gasland" is a narrative film by Josh Fox specifically exploring into the residential common gas industry and its overwhelming effects on the earth and human wellbeing. Then again, "Fracknation" is a narrative film that assaults claims by the counter fracking film "Gasland" whose movie producers pulled in national regard for water quality worries by setting faucet water ablaze. Rather, they go more top to bottom attempting to get the genuine accurate answers of the circumstances and end results hydraulic fracking prompts. A narrative is a film that must be demonstrated accurate, be that as it may, as indicated by "Fracknation": a great deal of the data observed in "Gasland" is turned out to be false…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland the Documentary

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gasland, a documentary produced and directed by Josh Fox, focuses on communities in the United States that have been impacted by natural gas drilling. It shows an in-depth look at a method known as fracking which horizontally drills into deep rock in search of the black gold. Josh Fox lives in Pennsylvania and when he was asked to lease his families land out to an oil company so they could drill on his property, he refused and decided to take action. Fox traveled all around the country and visited residencies in communities that were badly hit by this sudden rush for the natural gas. There are many scenes in the documentary which illustrate three key aspects to a film, subject, credibility, and impact.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaslands Part II

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie Gaslands: Part II highlights the many problems with fracking for natural gas in the United States. It starts by showing the support of politicians and President Barack Obama himself. Gradually, the movie starts to show the wrongs that the oil companies are committing while fracking. The natural gas is so profitable that the injustice seems like a minor setback in the quest for the end results. Throughout the movie, it shows how families are affected, and just how spread out these families are throughout the country, which goes to show the extent to which the country is affected.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What do you know about fracking? Fracking is the industry that is natural gas being abstracted from shale rock. It’s hydraulic done by injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to get into the shale rock to release natural gas. Why does the industry do this? It is more wrongs than rights but the natural gas is a clean burning gas. Gas is environmentally good when it is burnt but when it is being abstracted from the shale rock is when it is bad.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The instances of water contamination are not unique to New York and Northern Pennsylvania. For the first time, Pennsylvania has made public 243 cases of contamination of private drinking wells from oil and gas drilling operations. The cases occurred in 22 counties, with Susquehanna, Tioga, Bradford, and Lycoming counties having the most incidences of contamination. In a few cases, one drilling operation contaminated the water of multiple wells, with water issues resulting from methane gas contamination, wells that went dry or undrinkable,…

    • 1987 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Range Resources Case Study

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. The stakeholders of Range Resources (RR) are widespread from anyone affected by the economy and the environment in relation to RR’s activities. More directly, the stakeholders range from employees of Range Resources, the employees and officers of federal and state agencies regulating RR’s activities, to the populations in local and distant communities that are either benefiting from the products of RR’s activities or suffering from the byproducts of the same activities. Stakeholders also include the consumers of the natural gas, and the future generations who may reside in the areas affected by the fracturing (“fracking”) process.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keystone

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Koening, Brian. “Approving The Keystone XL Pipeline.” New American. 27 .20 12 Mar 2011: 15-18. The author in this newspaper article gives more of an opposition to my other sources. He is trying to persuade people into approving the pipeline. Koening says pipelines do occasionally leak but does not believe it will contaminate the water supply for millions. Him saying this leaves me to believe that he doesn’t know the importance of the Ogallala aquifer. Which is a huge topic of persuasion for me in my final essay. Koening somewhat bashes environmentalists in this article and portrays global warming to be not that important of an issue. His approval of the pipeline will be an important factor for my final essay because his viewpoints are contrast of mine.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hydraulic Fracturing

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Most of our bodies are made up of water, just about 75-80%. Imagine someone drilling inside of you to suck all of your bodies nutrients and minerals out, then mixing your body water with chemicals that you are unaware of. Today making a difference in our economic system, means poisoning our Great Lakes, killing off the future, and not giving children the benefit of the doubt if that were done to the people of the states. Fracking, also known as hydraulic fracturing, fracking, and fracture stimulation, is shale gas drilling companies come to an area, buy up drilling rights from landowners, cut new roads and raze patches of land formerly undisturbed natural environments, cart in and out tens of millions of gallons of water and tons of chemicals and “proppants” like sand with hundreds of big rig trucks that produce tons of diesel emissions and wear down existing roads, drill holes under multiple properties, mix water, chemicals and proppants together on-site to make fracking fluid, pump the fracking fluid in and out underground to shatter underground deposits of shale to release bound-up natural gas. After the entire process everyone they install permanent equipment to “clean” and capture most of the natural gas pack up go home cashes their checks and live happily while your land is being contaminated with a light white mist of chemicals to top your land and on top of that you would be at risk of effecting some of the senses, skin, eyes, and respiratory functions (nofracking!). The process produces toxic wastewater containing carcinogens and radioactive elements such as radon and uranium. Citizens should not drink, or bath in chemicals harmful to their bodies, nor should people pay for fresh water when it can just run from the tap in their homes. Hydraulic Fracturing should not be an option for making money. In order to bring our economy out of its depression we will be sacrificing our drinking water,…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, congress has unsuccessfully tried to regulate fracking by passing the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act in 2009, 2011, and again in 2013. Second, oil and gas industry leaders continue hampering regulations and oversight by spending more than $747 million in the last 10 years on lobbying and political campaign efforts (Browning and Kaplan). Third, the incomprehensible fact is that hydraulic fracturing continues operations without restriction while the U.S. Geological Survey concluding that earthquakes near Youngstown, Ohio were manmade, when evidence shows no manmade activity in the area except fracking (Bambrick 2) and a recommendation by Environmental Commissioner Joe Martin to ban fracking due to unresolved health issues (Esch). Fourth, a Boston College review about communities in the dark reveals rural property owners are approached by companies offering huge royalties for land rights promising safe practices and stating that no harm will come to them; however, when numerous reports of illness occur these large entities hide the chemicals they use by citing trade secret laws; meanwhile, the near-poverty-level individuals lack the finances to fight back (Fisher 100). Consequently, even those who have damning evidence tend to settle out of court, leaving no help for others suffering, because litigation is sealed or accompanied by a statement of confidentiality. If Sunshine Law mentality applied to private litigation, transformation of inept practices would progress more rapidly, including standards and policies for safe drilling, safe waste disposal, safe storage of fracking chemicals, and requirements for well…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Film Critique Of Gasland

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The film ‘Gasland’ was made so that we are able to see the real effects of the fracking process on the environment and the complaints of citizens who are living in the area. Josh Fox had the option to lease his land to energy companies in exchange for a large sum of money. The energy industry has claimed that America has some of the largest natural gas reserves and it will be the energy of the future. Rather than simply signing the papers, he decided to go out and do his own research by collecting water samples of the surrounding neighborhood. His findings were shocking since there were many reports of illnesses of both humans and animals and fire hazards from contaminants flowing through water pipes. It had become regular to…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dilemma

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PlentErgy is an openly traded oil and gas exploration company with operations mostly in Texas and Oklahoma. We do not want to miss the oil exploration in North Dakota. We are highly skilled in hydraulic fracturing or fracking, which is a technique that is used to release oil and gas from rock formations. We are confident that we could use fracking safely to release oil and gas from sites in North Dakota. The ethical dilemma that stands in the way is fracking is closely linked to waste disposal. Millions of galloons of salty, chemical infused wastewater, know, as brine is part of fracking. Oil companies are dumping and spilling the waste onto the land and waterway with increasing regularity. They are supposed to put the brine thousands of feet underground to get into disposal wells but it is not making it that far down. We do not want to miss out at this opportunity in North Dakota but other oil companies are making it tough for us to keep a good reputations with all these stories about them ruining peoples farm land and not doing anything about it.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking (hydraulic fracturing), a simple but revolutionary process, has changed the way of collecting natural resources after the propitious success in 1947. By injecting water, sand, and toxic chemical such as mercury and lead with high pressure into a wellbore, fractures smaller than 1mm will be created and a vast amount of formerly inaccessible hydrocarbon are now available for use and thus brought “U.S. to become one of the world 's top three oil producers”(Garder, US Reuters). On the other hand, this seemingly stupendous process with such salient features also bears another side – Hydraulic fracturing gives off numerous environmental risks such as contamination of ground water and surface air that can easily effect the public health. Facing all the advantages and disadvantages, one cannot truly determine the propriety of fracking if one does not fully understand the environmental, economic, legal, and political aspects of fracking.…

    • 2305 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Advantages Of Fracking

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gas companies want to drill wells into the Marcellus Shale, which is New York’s main source of water, where the water that New York is known for comes from. The water they need to live can be contaminated with harmful chemicals and exposure to it can cause many fatal injuries and possibly death. Inhalation may cause serious lung damage and contact with eyes can lead to a total loss of vision. Based on my knowledge of fracking we to guarantee safety from this water contamination we can fight back and protest against fracking. Fracking is not safe and is harmful to the environment and the people can be greatly affected by…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Finance

    • 690 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is possible to pump this water out of the ground and release the methane, which can then be sold. This process produces lots of waste water, which poisonous properties, which is being dumped into nearby streams, which then flow onto the land of downstream ranches, severely damaging the land. Discuss this problem using the tools of public finance and propose two solutions, one involving taxes and the other involving property rights. In Montana, there are some large deposits of water containing dissolved methane (fossil fuel).…

    • 690 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Islam

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As shown in the film the Promised Land, the new science industry cares very little for the environment and a lot more for their money. During the movie characters Matt Damon and Francis McDormand are sent to Pennsylvania, which at the time was struggling economically. Their employer, Global Crosspower Solutions sends them out to the people giving them only the information they knew could convince the people and hiding the facts that would turn them away. This money driven company does not include the fact that the format they use to obtain the gas, really hurts the environment. Killing their cattle, grass, and other crops as chemicals are infused into the ground in order to get to the gas. It only took one brave man, Mr. Kinney who had done his research enough to educate the people on the real process and to convince them the company did not care for them, but for the money. A lot of scientist today rely on…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics