The Grundnorm: Basic Or Political Change?
As explained before, Grundnorm can be defined as basic or fundamental norm. The term grundnorm was coined by Hans Kelsen to refer to the core basis of a law. Hans Kelsen once said that after a successful revolution the grundnorm changes.
In addition, The Penguin Webster handy college dictionary defined revolution as a total change of conditions, specifically, a radical social or political change.
On the other hand, Merriam-Webster dictionary defined revolution as;
• the usually violent attempt by many people to end the rule of one government and start a new one
• a sudden, extreme, or complete change in the way people live, work, etc.
• a fundamental change in political organization; especially: the overthrow or renunciation of one government …show more content…
His message called upon the people to refrain from illegal acts furthering the objects of the illegal régime. This is the fact that happen chronologically for this case.
The court held that, since full Sovereignty over Southern Rhodesia was acquired when the territory was annexed by the Crown in 1923, and had not been diminished either by the limited grant of self-government then made or by United Kingdom legislation passed since that date, The Queen in the United Kingdom Parliament was still Sovereign in Southern Rhodesia in 1965 and that, accordingly.
The Southern Rhodesia Act, 1965, and the Southern Rhodesia (Constitution) Order in Council, 1965, were of full legal effect in Southern Rhodesia; that nothing either in the British Nationality Act or in the 1961 Constitution wrought to confer even limited sovereignty upon Southern Rhodesia
Additionally, the convention under which the Parliament of the United Kingdom did not legislate without the consent of the Government of Southern Rhodesia on matters within the competence of the Legislative Assembly, though politically important as a convention, had no legal effect in limiting the powers of the United Kingdom
In addition, The Penguin Webster handy college dictionary defined revolution as a total change of conditions, specifically, a radical social or political change.
On the other hand, Merriam-Webster dictionary defined revolution as;
• the usually violent attempt by many people to end the rule of one government and start a new one
• a sudden, extreme, or complete change in the way people live, work, etc.
• a fundamental change in political organization; especially: the overthrow or renunciation of one government …show more content…
His message called upon the people to refrain from illegal acts furthering the objects of the illegal régime. This is the fact that happen chronologically for this case.
The court held that, since full Sovereignty over Southern Rhodesia was acquired when the territory was annexed by the Crown in 1923, and had not been diminished either by the limited grant of self-government then made or by United Kingdom legislation passed since that date, The Queen in the United Kingdom Parliament was still Sovereign in Southern Rhodesia in 1965 and that, accordingly.
The Southern Rhodesia Act, 1965, and the Southern Rhodesia (Constitution) Order in Council, 1965, were of full legal effect in Southern Rhodesia; that nothing either in the British Nationality Act or in the 1961 Constitution wrought to confer even limited sovereignty upon Southern Rhodesia
Additionally, the convention under which the Parliament of the United Kingdom did not legislate without the consent of the Government of Southern Rhodesia on matters within the competence of the Legislative Assembly, though politically important as a convention, had no legal effect in limiting the powers of the United Kingdom