Preview

The Handbook of Epicurus: The Unlived Life

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1942 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Handbook of Epicurus: The Unlived Life
The Unlived Life:
Rejecting Pleasure to Avoid Pain in The Handbook of Epicurus
According to The Handbook of Epicurus, achieving the good life can only be done by living the life of apatheia- life free from emotional disturbance and worry. Epicurus proposes that in order to achieve true apatheia man must completely detach himself from everything outside his control: from the body, from possessions, from death, and from relationships with others. It is only through accepting that we lack control in the world order that true peace can be achieved. By focusing primarily on what one can control, namely one’s opinions, impulses, desires, and aversions, Epicurus believes that apatheia will be reached and the good life finally lived. However, in order to reach the life of apatheia Epicurus essentially suggests removing all pleasures from life because they also result in pain and worry. Although a life without pain and worry (apatheia) does sound ideal, it removes the very emotional base that gives life its substance. In order to truly experience life, you must experience pain so that you can also experience joy. Although the life of apatheia seeks to remove the possibility of pain, it in turn removes any possibility of experiencing true delight, experiences which give life meaning. Epicurus proposes experiencing everything in moderation and removing all attachments to others. In removing all these things the life of apatheia ultimately results in a life unlived.
The foundation of Epicurus’s apatheia lies in accepting life as it is given to you. Multiple times throughout The Handbook Epicurus makes it clear that one should “not seek to have events happen as you want them to, but instead want them to happen as they do happen, and your life will go well” (13). On the surface this theory simply requires people to stop seeking out what they do not have or trying to control their own fates. Epicurus further emphasizes the importance of accepting one’s fate by comparing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Which Hellenistic philosophy taught that we should strive for “pleasure,” defined as the absence of pain? –Epicureanism…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epicurus seems to believe that the idea that ataraxia/ happiness can be achieved if one is able to lessen pain as much as possible, on the other hand, Epictetus believes that ataraxia/happiness can only be reached by having a strong mind and if one is indifferent to external events that are beyond one's control. Epictetus's ethical theory seems to be a little influenced by his belief in god and more about his stoicism, while Epicurus, though he does not deny the existence of God, his theory is less influenced by divinity. Epicurus’s theory maintains that people should try to minimize one’s own desires and pains. Also, for someone to reach the highest form of pleasure, it is important to have a positive attitude toward the future and death.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s beliefs on living a good life start with careful deliberation of the ends and the means. Suppose I want a laptop--the laptop is my goal, purpose, or end. I can do various things to get the laptop--such as earn, steal, borrow, or save. These things are known as my means. The means I decide to use depends on which is more convenient and which leads to the most benefits. Contemplating about the end goal that we are pursuing, and the means we use to reach that goal is practical thinking. However, this type of thinking does not come to fruition, until purposeful action occurs; which is acting with some purpose, goal, or end in mind. This purposeful action is compared differently with thoughtless action, which is an action with no purpose…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suffering and Epicurus

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epicurus was a hedonist, a materialist and a consequentialist who strongly believed that in order to attain the good life one must live a pleasant existence free of worry and pain. Through reflection of the concepts in Epicurus’s Letter to Menoeceus this paper will discuss Epicurus’s argument of why ‘death means nothing to us’ (Epicurus 1998a, p.49). In other words, the concept that one should not fear death, which he held to be a state of fear bringing only pain to one’s life. In addition, the notion of applying these concepts for ethical purposes on how one should live their life will be explained. In conclusion, this paper will provide a compelling argument of the reasons why Epicurus’s ideas on being fearless of death did indeed contribute to the alleviation of pain and helped with the pursuit of happiness or ataraxia (peace of mind).…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One interesting thing about Epicurus’ is that he believed that the true life of pleasure consists…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because people only live once, they desire a happy and successful life, in other words, a “good life.” To complete this goal of a good life, a majority of society will do nearly everything possible to be comfortable and be happy. The extremes, which people go to in order to achieve what they think is necessary, are merely shadows, or illusions of reality that are believed to lead people to a good life. However, according to the prominent Greek philosopher, Plato, the good life is one in which individuals are not entirely comfortable and happy. The good life is one in which they are finding the ultimate truth and becoming open-minded, sometimes forcing them to oppose the norms of society, and escape the shadows. Though it is hard to do, people who abandon the “cave” of false reality and misinterpretation will live a true good life. The people who have escaped the cave have enlightened themselves by thinking…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus says that Pleasure is what we pursue and, what we come back to, but for him pleasure stems from lack of pain. He believed that a life on moderation brought the most pleasure that over indulgence was unhealthy and brought pain. The simple things in life bring the most pleasure. He believed that mental pain was worse the physical pain. He explained mental pain a disturbance of the mind. He urged prudence in our pursuit of pleasures, and that all other virtues spring from it.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The prospect of death is at best a disquieting annoyance; it is at worst a terrifying mystery” (Rosenbaum 175). Death, a tragedy of life, is an experience that each and every one of us have to undergo through at a certain point in our lifetime. May it be from old age, sickness, violence etc. death is a state of affairs that is inescapable. Stephen Rosenbaum, a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, writes the essay “How to Be Dead and Not care” where he introduces Epicurus’ argument, defends and explicates it while also incorporating an American philosopher Thomas Nagel, objections to the argument. Evidently Rosenbaum’s essay serves as an insight for readers to learn how to value and repurpose their lives to be better than they are. Personally I do believe that death is not always bad for one in that, if a person were sick and day-in-day-out they were in pain, which hindered their daily interactions and experiences, then their death is not bad. At this point the person is at peace hence no pain, no sufferings, and no worries. Looking at the antithesis of my belief, if a happy person dies of a car accident then at this point death is bad for them since it deprives the person of their continued happiness and…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    200) I think what Epictetus was trying to say is to not seek or wish to have events happen to you as you would want them to happen. For if you did you would be always be in a rut, always seeking what you want out of like instead of taking what your life has to offer. Each life has something else to offer each individual person. For what might happen to one might not happen for you and it might not happen when you want it too. When people win the big money with the lottery, there is always someone wishing they had that money or luck. They think of things to say of why that person does not even need that money and how you could use it for better and/ or wiser things. Who is to say that you won’t win the lottery tomorrow, the next year or 15 years from now? So there is no reason to wish or be concerned of what you have and do not…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many things in this life that we cannot control, and according to the famous philosopher, Epictetus, we are to accept this fact and live our lives to the fullest. From his works, Discourses and Enchiridion, we learn that Epictetus lived a “Stoic” way of life—one in which everything happens for a reason, and for our own ultimate good. Epictetus viewed life as a play, in which we are the actors, and a powerful God is the director. According to the text, Epictetus believed that one should strive to live by certain “commandments” for life, and that one should accept his own life and live it the best that he can.…

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPICURUS TO MENOECEUS

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus in his letter to Menoeceus backers the necessity of freedom from prejudice, superstition and extremes of emotions in the pursuit of happiness and a tranquil life. The apparent simplicity of this formula allowed detractors to misinterpret Epicurus, depicting him as depraved, hedonistic, anarchistic and atheistic. His aim is to present to us, how to live a happy life. He sees happiness as the fundamental principle of the good life. This paper is an attempt to critically delineate the essential tenets of Epicureanism as articulated in his letter to Menoeceus, and finally to criticize and evaluate in order to arrive at a dependable conclusion. In what follows, it would be apt to briefly consider the personality or Epicurus, before delving into the main work.…

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is futile to fight against the inevitable, such as maladies or death, because illness, injuries, and mortality are inescapable. For this reason, Epictetus redefines loss as restoration. “Has your child died? It is restored. Has your wife died? She is restored. Has your estate been taken away? That likewise is restored.” (Epictetus, XI). Epictetus reasons that life and property are never truly owned, but rather possessed. He believes that peace and happiness is more important than possessions. The example of a misbehaving slave is made. “Is a little oil spilt or a little wine stolen? Say to yourself ‘This is the price to be paid for tranquility; and nothing is to be had for nothing.’” (Epictetus, XII). Epictetus makes the point that it is more important to be at peace than it is to correct the slave’s behavior through punishment.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Purity s Shadow

    • 2547 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Whether we seek spiritual transcendence and deny our primitive biology and human needs, or conversely if we deny a yearning for truth by soothing ourselves with excessive indulgence, exclusively opting for one in lieu of the other costs us actuality in its full. Holding polarities such as altruism and instinctual drives, love and hate, work and play, with equanimity, proves a difficult feat for many.…

    • 2547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and Eudaimonia

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Aristotle everyone first and foremost wants a eudaimon life, a life in which he does well and fares well. Aristotle thinks there is one good that is sought for not for the sake of anything else: the summum bonum (greatest good). The greatest good is eudaimonia (living well, doing well, flourishing). In the well-ordered personality the parts of will function together under the leadership of the rational element. The goal we all seek is eudaimonia. Eudiamonia is a life of rational activity, informed with Arete (virtue), which is pursued continually. Our ability to achieve eudaimonia depends on us having some power or access to resources in the world. People without power never reach their moral potential. Friendship is necessary to eudaimonia and it is an extension of self-esteem. By virtue of being rational animals we naturally live by a plan or rule. But just as the good life is an activity of reason in relation with excellence, eudaimonia depends on having the right rule or plan. The right rule or plan is the one that leads to our possessing what is really good for us, what is needed to live well. The good life (eudaimonia) involves three real goods, each of which corresponds to an aspect of our nature. These goods are external goods, which are grounded in our animal nature (food, shelter), bodily goods, which are grounded in our animal nature (health, vitality), and goods of the soul (mind, reason), which are grounded in our rational and social nature ( knowledge and friendship). External goods are a means to bodily goods, and both these goods are required for goods of the soul. Without food we become physically ill. A sick or dying person is not interested in studying or going out with friends. Also, goods of the soul are unlimited real goods ( we can never have enough), whereas the other goods are limited ( we can sometimes have too much of…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Sophocles’ “Oedipus Rex”, there are examples of an individual who denies his fate and suffers for not accepting it. Sophocles demonstrates this through Oedipus’ late realization in his racing battle against fate. Even with the best of intentions to avoid his tragedy, Oedipus is lead directly to his end. But, by choosing to run away and defy the gods, he is condemned to a suffering like no other. Furthermore, the Greeks believed that fate should be accepted because ultimately it cannot be avoided, thus the tragedy of Oedipus Rex. Throughout “Oedipus Rex,” Sophocles proves fate is inevitable and one must learn to accept his end because the attempt to avoid fate is destructive.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays