Cisneros highlights the fluidity between Private and public domains. She conveys the transformative properties of spaces to highlight the constant …show more content…
He professes that in order to attain social recognition he must give up his association with his private sphere. He believes working-class literature to be unrealistic and urges others to obtain a public voice through academia. The public voice is irrelevant to the working class. For example, Rodriquez states, “They came and left in a single old truck. Anonymous men. They were never introduced to the other men at the site” (134). Spanish is not a public language that encompasses a global scale for recognition and associates the Spanish language within the realm of the domestic sphere in relation to intimacy. The education he attains through his immersion into academia and the loss of his relationship to his private domain illuminates a stark distinction that inhibits hybridization. Thus, education manifests mimicry rather than freedom of thought and creativity, for instance, the very first facts they dispensed, I grasped with awe. Any book they told me to read, I read -- then waited for them to tell me which books I enjoyed. Their every casual opinion I came to adopt and to trumpet when I returned home” (49). Rodriquez perceives education as an attainment of knowledge, rather than a fluid and ever-changing construct/force for progressive transformations. He fears his own creativity, which perpetuated, "sentences