There is no doubt that television holds a purpose in our society today, but is that purpose brain-numbing or actually beneficial to our brain development? The television, also known as: TV, the boob tube, the idiot box, as well as many other nicknames, has been around for almost a hundred years. Ever since cable TV became popular in the 1950’s, there has always been a worry that people watch too much TV. Most people believe that with exorbitant exposure to the popular media both dumbs us down as well as makes us more likely to tolerate acts of violence. Dana Stevens’ “Thinking Outside the Idiot Box” argues that television does not make you smarter, directly contrasting Steven Johnsons article, “Watching TV Makes You Smarter.” Television has definitely made a mark on our hearts and has most certainly made an impact on society, but too much of a good thing is never a good thing. The propaganda photo about television that was found on Facebook is a good lens that helps me understand Stevens’ argument better. The photo assisted the understanding of Stevens’ depiction and contradiction of Johnsons writing, her discussion about what these “more complex shows” are actually like, as well as her discussion about the national event TV Turn Off Week. This photo clearly depicts that TV does not enhance or benefit in brain production in any way, however it “destroys” the imagination, or what’s left of it, and in return, it fills the mind with complete nonsense, and therefore numbing the brain. The photo, which is a picture of a television, states, “My job is to help destroy what’s left of your imagination by feeding you endless doses of sugar-coated mindless garbage.” As humans, we are very complex intellectual beings, however television has been captivating our minds and bringing our intelligence down.…
“And so, I raise no objection to television's junk. The best things on television are its junk, and no one and nothing is seriously threatened by it. Besides, we do not measure a culture by its output of undisguised trivialities but by what it claims as significant. Therein is our problem, for television is at its most trivial and, therefore, most dangerous when its aspirations are high, when it presents itself as a carrier of important cultural conversations. The irony here is that this is what intellectuals and critics are constantly…
Furthermore, all this questions may be also linked to the Sue Palmer’s book Toxic Childhood (2006:3), in which she describes a deep crisis of modern childhood, inasmuch the new reach media environment ‘is now damaging children’s ability to think, learn and behave’.…
Television is the predominant media-metaphor of this generation. Television shapes the way people think, act, and communicate; however, this powerful apparatus does not always disclose the whole truth. In fact, television often hides the whole truth from the public, but, ironically, most people love the media and blindly believe what the media says. As Alford Huxley says, people will “adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.” Unfortunately, Huxley’s hypothesis is slowly becoming a reality. In Neil Postman’s “Amusing Ourselves To Death,” Postman argues that the many facets of television people love will actually ruin them. Of these many facets of television, three are predominant. Television is ruining people’s lifestyles…
Since pop culture permeates into every corner of American society, the focus of staying youthful in America started, and has continued to stay, there. In the 1940's, every adult male was dressed nicely at a sporting event, but now, a “good part of the crowd...is wearing jeans and team caps and T-shirts...” (par. 2). Life in America has become more casual, due to the relaxed attitude stemming from the 1950's. Epstein does not like this. He seems to feel like America is losing strength as a respectable nation because most of the adults in the country do not want to grow up and take on their adult responsibilities and dress codes. Epstein has not completely given up on middle aged America yet. According to him, “There still are adults in America...Alan Greenspan, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Robert Rubin, Warren Buffett, Sol Linowitz...”(par.8). This list seems impressive, but since the average teenage reader may not recognize any of the names his list, the allusion he presents is wasted on a younger audience. It may work on the older readers who the author may be trying to alert of the youth culture shift, but the list may still be outdated. According to Epstein, “The shift into youth culture began in...[with]…
When watching a program, people are focused on the plot, make inferences, and create relationships with characters. Therefore, develops a cognitive exercise for the audience. Johnson informs his readers that there is an interaction between people and a television screen. Some examples he describes are when TV shows allow the viewer to develop a mental outline of a show, when a characters encounter social issues, and giving someone a cultural experience through a TV screen. He includes visuals that show different threads of TV programs, displaying the complexity of their scenes overtime, and how much it challenges the brain. Those graphs associate with Johnson’s term the “Sleeper Curve” (279), which according to him is the most debased form of mass diversion. He says that even if it is just reality television, violent content on TV or video games, and children shows, it still helps people become perceptive. Johnson concludes that instead of people having a negative attitude or having fears of their children being influenced by content of TV or video games, he insists that they both should share the experience. Parents and children will continue to interact with the TV screen mentally and therefore develop skills no matter what they watch. This essay presents in argument that television is good for…
By using the metaphor effectively, Barry calls readers’ reflection and arouses their sympathy by saying that “we leave them to learn from the blind eyes of a television.” (21) Barry casts her doubt on the benefits of the television and makes the connection to her childhood experience by watching bloody movies at home. It is sad for readers to see that watching violent movies becomes the only joy for an invisible child to stay at home. “Blind eyes” of television vividly states that entertainment does not have obligation to teach children knowledge in the right ways not even to heal their mental problems. Leaving children under the chaotic world with bad influence will be the big failure of the education system. Additionally, utilizing the quote from president George H.W.Bush, Barry makes her statement stronger and reminds that government has to fulfill its responsibility by providing a promising future to our children. “A thousand points of light ” (21)implies to the different types of school programs, which acts as a guidance to light up children’s future. However, “point of light”(21) seems to flee away from the star when people advocate to cut down the school budgets. Barry gives readers space to imagine the power of light--school programs, which can help children to find their own sense of belonging and spiritual…
Chapter 5 covers many examples of why the media treats children as a special audience. Potter first explains that children have a lack of experience and maturation with the media. He underlines the importance of a good elementary education for gaining more experience, being educated, and aware of certain media messages. Children have a lack of maturation which is why Potter clarifies that there are certain things a child can learn at certain ages in their lives. The author emphasizes that cognitive, emotion, and moral development are vital for children from a media literacy perspective. Once the media recognized the impact of certain content portrayed to children had, TV and advertising regulated this explicit content. Potter discusses about…
Hetsroni’s and Tukachinsky’s purpose for this article was to examine cultivation of television programming and its effects on how viewers see the world. They wanted to see the extent of cultivation by gauging the range of accurate and inaccurate estimations of the television world and the real world. Thus, giving them a clearer picture of how television can cultivate the way we think.…
Cited: Bachtel, Rose. “Television: Destroying Childhood.” The Composition of Everyday Life. Ed. John Mauk and John Mentz. Boston: Wadsworth, 2012. 619-621. Print.…
In his article “Television as Teacher” scholar and critic Neil Postman gives his views on what exactly educational television is teaching children. For example, “Parents embraced Sesame Street for several reasons, among them that it assuaged their guilt over the fact that they could not or would not restrict their children’s access to television.” Postman is well known for his claims that television causes people to want more and more entertainment out of life, so much that people begin to expect the news to be entertainment as well. Also, Postman argues that educational television does not teach children things like math, letters, or science, but instead it teaches them to expect entertainment out of their education, and because of this, schools must now try to be more entertaining because that is what children are used to. Postman is correct when he explains that parents can have some wrongs on how children are embrace or eager to hope that television could teach children basic knowledge on TV.…
Many parents are guilty of blaming the television for making their kid obsessed with the wrong things, or for distracting them from school. On the other hand, National Public Radio suggests that television actually makes children better readers. They argue that literacy not only means being able to read, write, listen, and speak, but also to understand the different dimensions of these features. These dimensions include digital media and complex skills building to create a more well-rounded individual. They state that to achieve this, television can be used as a medium for kids to experience the “new” literacy while their parents help them achieve the “old” literacy goal. National Public Radio also believes that adults need to get past the more traditional approach of "no screen time" and use more modern approaches for their children to understand since they live in the 21st century. This shows that the author believes that the parents are at fault at times for underdeveloped children literacy, which is the opposite of what other people believe. Television should still be used in moderation, but adults have to understand that keeping their child from this device only hinders their development of what is called a “21st century” literacy. “21st century” literacy refers to being able to interpret other things such as images and emotion, not just being able to read, write, listen, and…
Television, it was once thought, would never become a contender for radio because the American family just didn’t have time to sit with their eyes glued to a screen. However, family life changed drastically in the late 1940’s and people had plenty of time to sit, glued, to shows like The Ed Sullivan Show, Candid Camera and Howdy Doody." Fast forward a few decades and we meet Mike Teavee, a Willy Wonka protagonist, obsessed with the tube. Mike’s parents come to like the idea of Mike watching TV because they can keep track of him and just put food next to the TV. Sadly, this portrayal has become all to real in the American culture as generation after generation become addicted to their screens. Television has been imbedded into almost…
Television is the main source of entertainment in America and across the world. Television is how we get our information about such things as: weather, breaking news, politics, and even just the latest celebrity gossip. Adults and children alike, watch TV to relax and learn about the world around them; but how much of that information is being retained is the question Neil Postman longs to answer. Based upon his essay “Television as Teacher” not much, Postman believes as stated “-reasoned analysis is increasingly supplanted by shallow images, thereby hindering the ways we learn about the world” (421). Postman goes on to describe his belief that television dilutes…
Television can also be very manipulative because a picture can make people feel a certain way and as the article says, “If TV metaphorically targets the…