Fraser case. This case came up after a student named Matthew Fraser was suspended being he gave a speech at a school assembly to nominate another student to be in the class government, the speech he gave however was highly obscene. The student sued and pleaded that the school had taken away the right to the first amendment. The school ended up winning because they hadn’t taken his first amendment rights and the first amendment doesn't take away the schools ability to “disciplin(e) a student for using speech that is lewd of indecent” (Your). I think that this is the right amount of limitations because this student was being inappropriate and saying obscene things about another student in front of the entire school and the school was just trying to keep control of the student. If the school hadn’t suspended the student then all the other kids at the school would think its okay to do that which would make an even bigger
Fraser case. This case came up after a student named Matthew Fraser was suspended being he gave a speech at a school assembly to nominate another student to be in the class government, the speech he gave however was highly obscene. The student sued and pleaded that the school had taken away the right to the first amendment. The school ended up winning because they hadn’t taken his first amendment rights and the first amendment doesn't take away the schools ability to “disciplin(e) a student for using speech that is lewd of indecent” (Your). I think that this is the right amount of limitations because this student was being inappropriate and saying obscene things about another student in front of the entire school and the school was just trying to keep control of the student. If the school hadn’t suspended the student then all the other kids at the school would think its okay to do that which would make an even bigger