Preview

The Indian Succession Act

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
403 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Indian Succession Act
The Indian Succession Act
The Indian Succession Act was enacted in 1925. The object of the Act was to consolidate the large number of laws which were in existence at that time. Laws governing succession to Muslims and Hindus were excluded from the purview of the Act. While consolidating the law in respect of succession, two schemes, one relating to succession to property of persons like Indian Christians, Jews and persons married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the other relating to succession rights or Parsis, were adopted. Testamentary succession(through will) amongst Hindus are also governed by the Indian Succession Act.

This Act was amended by the Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 2002. It was felt that section 32 of the principal Act is discriminatory to widows and as such the proviso to section 32 was omitted to remove discrimination in this regard. Section 213 was also amended by this amending Act to make Christians at par with other communities.

The law relating to intestate succession among Hindus is codified in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (30 of 1956). It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The remarkable features of the Act are the recognition of the right of women to inherit property of an intestate equally with men and abolition of the life estate of female heirs.

A vast majority of Muslims in India follow Hanafi doctrines of Sunni law. Courts presume that Muslims are governed by Hanafi law unless it is established to be the contrary. Though there are many features in common between Shia and Sunni schools, yet there are differences in some respects. Sunni law regards Koranic verses of inheritance as an addendum to pre-Islamic customary law and preserves the superior position of male agnates. Unlike Hindu and Christian laws, Muslim law restricts a person's right of testation. A Muslim can bequeath only one-third of his estate. A bequest to a stranger is valid without the consent of heirs if it does

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Indian Act discriminate between Indigenous women and men due to ones arbitrariness and the regulations he or she follows. It is unfortunate that one of these reasons is due to their mixed-blood.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    If a married person with one child dies intestate and leaves separate property, the descendant's interest passes to the:…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 1830, President Andrew Jackson (1829–1837) signed the Indian Removal Act, which would take tribes of eastern Indians, living in settled states, and resettle them in specially designated districts west of the Mississippi River in Indian Territory (now the state of Oklahoma). Many tribes were affected by the Indian Removal Act. Most notably, the Cherokees, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, and Seminoles tribes were subjected to eviction (O’Neill 11). By the large, these tribes were known as the "Five Civilized Tribes" (weiser). The tribes had their own customs, traditions, government, and territories. Until When the Indian Removal Act was implemented, however, they found themselves equally casted out. Though the terms of their departures diverse, the Five…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal Act

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    May 28, 1830 The Indian removal act was passed. “It is generally acknowledged that this act spelled the end of Indian Rights to live in those states under their own traditional laws” (http://www.historynet.com) The Native American was forcefully removed from their Ancestral land and placed on federal territory west of the Mississippi. This was all done under the order of President Andrew Jackson. The reason for removal was no more than pure greed. The process in which the Native American was removed from their land was so heinous that it resulted in nearly 4000 (Unofficial) deaths of the Native American.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946 was established to hear any claims of the Indian tribes against the federal government for the unfair treatments. The federal government tried to utilize this act to deal with the long period of resentment of Indians as a reward for their contributions in the World War II. Hundreds of petitions from the Indians were submitted under this act. This act was positive to the Indians and the federal government has spend over 800 million dollars in dealing with these cases.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine being woken up in the middle of the night and being taken out of one’s house by soldiers and moved from their homelands to a foreign land in the west. That is what happened to the Indians during the Indian removals. The Indian Removal Act gave the government enough power to seize the Indian’s land and move them west. The removals were meant to be peaceful and fair. They were also supposed to be done voluntarily (“Trail”). Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act on May 28, 1830. The Indian Removal Act affected many American Indian Tribes.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Native Americans fought in court to stay on their land and even though they won President Jackson still forced them to leave. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act because white settlers didn’t want to live with the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson’s reasons for defending the Indian Removal Act were fraudulent and in the eyes of the Native Americans would be unfair and irrelevant. A few reasons would be the Trail of Tears, the Five Civilized Tribes, and the fact that the Cherokee Nation went to court.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the East India Company established their business in Indian subcontinent they were not aware about the laws of that area. As a result they faced problems in the administration levels. The main concern of the administrators of East India Company, Hastings and also his immediate successors, was to ensure maximum amount of land revenue along with the introduction of a judicial administration of both civil and criminal, which would command the authority over the native subjects.[1] So in 1772 Governor-General, Warren Hastings declared his Plan for the Administration of Justice that ‘in all suits regarding inheritance, marriage, caste and other religious usages or institutions, the laws of the Koran with respect to the Mohamedans and those of the Shaster with respect to the Gentoos shall invariably be adhered to.’[2] This policy developed some more policies that modernize Hindu law and established Anglo-Hindu law. The codification of Hindu law helped this personal to develop because before this codification Hindu law was not codified any where, so it became easier to bring reforms in a compiled law. Moreover, due to the policy of using Hindu law in civil cases concerning Hindu parties, Court Pundits were introduced in courts to help English judges in decision-making. Finally, besides taking help from pundits in giving judgment on Hindu law related cases, the English judges also took help the principles of common law. As a result the Hindu law developed, which contributed to the reforms of Hindu law that took place in the end of British India.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Registration of some classes of documents is compulsorily required under the various statutes like Transfer of Property Act, Contract Act etc. The (Jammu and Kashmir) Registration Act, Svt 1970 (1922 A.D) is a specific Legislation which under section 17 enumerates the documents which have been compulsorily registered under the Act. The first class of document which is enumerated under clause (a) sub section (1) of section 17 of the Registration Act (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) is an ‘instrument of gift of immovable property’. Thus as a general rule gifts relating to immovable property must be registered under the Act. The Act lays no exceptions to this rule as such; however, a repugnancy arises among the Statutes regarding the compulsory registration of the Gifts of immoveable property made by a Muslim. The (Jammu and Kashmir) Transfer of Property Act, Svt 1977( 1920 A.D.) saves under section 129 any rule of Muslim Law relating to gifts thereby exempting such gifts from the requirement of registration under section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act. However, the registration Act, without any exception for Muslim gifts, mandates compulsory registration for all gifts pertaining to immovable property. Given this context the pertinent question arises-whether the Muslim gift of immovable property is compulsorily registrable under section 17 (1) (a) of the Act?…

    • 3428 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FORM ‘F’ [See Sub-rule (1) of Rule 6] Nomination To (Give here name or description of the establishment with full address) 1, Shri/Shrimati ____________________________ (Name in full here) Whose particulars are given in the statement below, hereby nominate the person(s) mentioned below to receive the gratuity payable after my death as also the gratuity standing to my credit in the event of my death before that amount has become payable, or having become payable has not been paid and direct that the said amount of gratuity shall be paid in proportion indicated against the name(s) of the nominee(s). 2.I hereby certify that the person(s) nominated is a /are member(s) of my family with meaning of clause(h) of Section 2 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. 3. I hereby declare that I have no family with in the meaning of clause (h) of section 2 of the said Act. 4.[a] My father/mother/parents is/are not dependent on me. [b] My husband’s father/mother/parents is/are not dependent on my husband. 5. I have excluded my husband from my family by a notice dated the ________ to the controlling authority in terms of the proviso to clause (h) of Section 2 of the said Act. 6.Nomination made herein invalidates my previous nominations Nominee(s) Name in full with full Relationship Age of Address of nominees(s) with the employee shared [1] 1. 2. 3. [2] [3]…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. In the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), after section 20, the following section shall be inserted, namely:— “20A. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, every citizen of India,— 10 (a) whose name is not included in the electoral roll; (b) who has not acquired the citizenship of any other country; and…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coparcenary Analysis

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Privy Council, after tracing the evolution of the various Schools of Hindu law, held that Hindu law should be administered from clear proof of usage which will outweigh the written text of law. Based on the Smriti Chandrika and Prasara Madhviya, the Privy Council concluded that in the Dravida School, in the absense of authority from the husband, a widow may adopt a son with the assent of his…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crap

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages

    According to the Doctrine of lapse, heirs adopted without the consent of the company could inherit only the private property of the deceased ruler & not his territory which would come under the company’s rule. Satara, Jaitpur Nagpur Udaipur & Sambalpur became the victim of the Doctrine of Lapse.…

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian constitution is the largest constitution in the world it contains originally 395 Articles, 22 parts, and 8 schedule. And presently it has 448 articles, 22 parts, and 12 schedules.…

    • 4770 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics