The Iran Nuclear Negotiation Case Study
QUIZ A
The Iranian Nuclear Negotiation is a multi-party negotiation deal between the P5 + 1 and Iran. This negotiation is about the nuclear program Iran has been undergoing, hence the enrichment of uranium to percentages capable for the use of nuclear weapons. The most recent negotiation was held in Switzerland, on a neutral ground. The P5+1 of the UN consists of the six strongest countries in the world; China, Russia, United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany. These six countries have been in negotiation deals since 2006 and now an agreement must be reached by 30th June which is the time constraint. The P5+1 party is being led by the United States of America ( "Iran parliament to review ties with U.N. nuclear body, 2011).
The negotiation …show more content…
Characterization frame is noticed on the part of the Supreme Islamic ruler who in no subtle way implied the US as bade fate negotiators for that reason he does not support the deal until it has been sealed for the details of the negotiation could turn against Iran. Power framing is seen on the part of the US Congress since they have the full backing of the P5+1 and the UN as a whole and can decide to put up new sanctions on Iran if need be. In process framing, a sit down negotiation process was adopted against violence to settle issues and for loss versus gain framing, Iran has more to lose and hence would have to comply with all details of the negotiation (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, …show more content…
In this negotiation since 2006, the non-verbal communication used is the sanctioning of Iran, which sends a clear message. The most used mode of communication was verbal in a face to face communication channel.
In my opinion, what is been done well is the initial agreement for there to be a negotiation and also the fact that there is no threat of violence so far. Another is the total availability of information to the general public as to what is happening in the negotiation for it is the people of Iran and the rest of the world who are the “hidden parties”. What I feel is not good is the stereotype of the US being bad fate negotiators and the Congress using coercive power to bully the Iranians with threats of putting up new sanctions (Karimi & Walsh,
The Iranian Nuclear Negotiation is a multi-party negotiation deal between the P5 + 1 and Iran. This negotiation is about the nuclear program Iran has been undergoing, hence the enrichment of uranium to percentages capable for the use of nuclear weapons. The most recent negotiation was held in Switzerland, on a neutral ground. The P5+1 of the UN consists of the six strongest countries in the world; China, Russia, United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany. These six countries have been in negotiation deals since 2006 and now an agreement must be reached by 30th June which is the time constraint. The P5+1 party is being led by the United States of America ( "Iran parliament to review ties with U.N. nuclear body, 2011).
The negotiation …show more content…
Characterization frame is noticed on the part of the Supreme Islamic ruler who in no subtle way implied the US as bade fate negotiators for that reason he does not support the deal until it has been sealed for the details of the negotiation could turn against Iran. Power framing is seen on the part of the US Congress since they have the full backing of the P5+1 and the UN as a whole and can decide to put up new sanctions on Iran if need be. In process framing, a sit down negotiation process was adopted against violence to settle issues and for loss versus gain framing, Iran has more to lose and hence would have to comply with all details of the negotiation (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, …show more content…
In this negotiation since 2006, the non-verbal communication used is the sanctioning of Iran, which sends a clear message. The most used mode of communication was verbal in a face to face communication channel.
In my opinion, what is been done well is the initial agreement for there to be a negotiation and also the fact that there is no threat of violence so far. Another is the total availability of information to the general public as to what is happening in the negotiation for it is the people of Iran and the rest of the world who are the “hidden parties”. What I feel is not good is the stereotype of the US being bad fate negotiators and the Congress using coercive power to bully the Iranians with threats of putting up new sanctions (Karimi & Walsh,