The Issue Of Jeremias: Replacement Of Personal Identity

Recall the consideration from the philosophy of religion involving replacement of the unregenerate person with a “different person altogether” (cite, pp. 139). Does it follow that Jeremias experience a replacement of personal identity with a different person altogether? Epistemically speaking, it would seem that Jeremias did not survive a change, because although he is aware of the idea ‘homosexuality is immoral and therefore not entitled to having a status equal to heterosexuality’, yet rather than believe the idea when he is aware of it, he simply passes judgment of it from a third person point of view. That is to say, if this is right, Jeremias at t2 seems to pass judgment of Jeremias at t1 as if they are separate individuals. Thus, our