Preview

The Law and Jury System in Agatha Christie's Murder on the Orient Express

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Law and Jury System in Agatha Christie's Murder on the Orient Express
The Law and Jury System in Murder on the Orient Express

The law and jury system probably is not something that you would consider important while reading Murder on the Orient Express. You probably wouldn't even think about it, unless you're thinking about the punishment that the murderer would endure. However at the end of the novel when you find out how much it impacted the novel you would be amazed. The book took place on the Orient Express, on the Istanbul-Calais coach where a man was killed in his sleep. The story also had to do with a case that took place in America, where a little girl Daisy Armstrong was taken from her home, held for ransom, but then killed after the ransom was paid. Throughout the book, Detective Poirot is trying to solve this mysterious case. The Jury system was found in the number of people who helped in the murder, the idea of how he was killed, and what Poirot and Monsieur Bouc decided to tell yugoslav police. The first thing I noticed that was important and having to do with the law and jury concept, was that there were 12 people. In the book all 13 of the passengers had something to do with the murder of Daisy Armstrong, her maid who committed suicide, Daisies’ mother who died giving birth to a premature baby, or her father who shot himself because he was so broken-hearted. In a jury there are 12 people that decide the fate of the convict, and on the Orient Express the passenger appointed themselves as a jury ; to decide the fate of despicable Samuel Ratchett aka Cassetti. So all of the passengers, with the exception of one, Countess Andrenyi who was innocent, helped with the murder of Ratchett, it “Made it more in order” as Colonel Arbuthnot put it. I think that all of the passengers agreed because they all believed that the Armstrong case deserved justice. In the story we find out that Casetti had done this other times. We the readers learn this when Mrs. Hubbard said “There had been other children before Daisy-There

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    3. What is the significance of law and the jury in this novel? What is the difference between the two? Is this important? Why or…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act Apush

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Admiralty Courts Stamp Act and Sugar Act offenses were tried in this court. Juries were not allowed and the burden of proof was on the defendant. All were assumed to be guilty until proven innocent. Trial by jury and innocent until proven guilty were basic rights that the British people everywhere had held dear.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men is a book written by Reginald Rose and takes place late one hot summer afternoon in the jury-room of a New York Court of law. The story revolves around a Jury that is trying to judge a murder trial. The 12 jurors must decide whether the defendant is guilty or not. The power of persuasion does not only influence characters in the book, but also persuades us to rethink, ‘Should something be changed in the judicial system?’…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People whom observe the judicial system from afar can come to the conclusion that justice may be “blind”. However, this is not always true. In Rose’s piece of writing, it becomes the duty of twelve jurors to “try and separate the facts from the fancy” (Rose, 5). This means that the jurors would have to decide whether or not a 16-year-old boy was guilty of allegedly stabbing his father to death and committing “murder in the first degree- premeditated homicide” (Rose, 5).…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juror’s recognized and valued that they were participating in a key pillar of democracy, a fair and unbiased jury. Juror #11 mentions the importance of this, saying to the jury that “This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are…ummmm… what is the word… Ah, notified! That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have not known before.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, we are given the right to a jury trial, one of the most important freedoms that out judicial system has to offer us. A jury consists of anywhere between 6 and 12 registered voters who determine whether a person is guilty or innocent in the act of crime that they are being accused of. Not only do they possess this power in a trial, but they may also judge the laws themselves and whether or not is perhaps unconstitutional, unfair, or cumbersome, in which case they can declare the defendant, the person accused of the crime, not-guilty. Their responsibility is heavy and their power enormous in the outcome of a trial. It is a way of distributing the power so that not just one person has total power, and also allowing society to be involved with their government because the jury acts as the conscience of our society.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to a trial by jury can be traced to the Magna Carta in 1215. This right was incorporated into…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the novel and then there were none by Agatha Christie I don’t think she favors one social class or another. but think that she is trying to tell people that they should try their best at life and what you do as a person can and will come back to haunt you in your future. But at the same time in the book the first character to die is rich and dies a UN harmful death by being poisoned. The lifestyle promoted in this book is the upper-class.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Murder on the Orient Express

    • 2273 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Murder on the Orient Express is more than just a murder mystery. It is a novel that utilizes a great deal of existing social issues of the era in which it was written and formed a commentary on those issues while giving the reader an intriguing yet approachable narrative. Through this approach, Agatha Christie has given the reader an opportunity to see the world through the eyes of the seasoned private investigator Hercule Poirot. In this world, nothing is at it seems and apparent coincidence belies a hidden truth, a world in which the geographical connections created by passenger railways allowed people of different nationalities and classes to rub elbows. Stereotypes of class and nationalities are both dominant social themes that persist throughout the novel. Social themes of crime, as well as good versus evil of the era also play an important role in the narrative.…

    • 2273 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Having a Jury Trial is known to be a part of the Adversarial System. Which is when exhibits, evidence, and witnesses are assembled by representatives of one side or the other to convince the fact finder that their side’s viewpoint is the truer one. Contrasted to that approach is the inquisitorial approach, used in mostly Europe. In this approach the Judge is given more control over the proceedings. The judge will interrogate the disputing parties and witnesses, referring frequently to a dossier that the court prepared. The Jury Trial is held to get a less biased decision and also a more truthful one. A trial gives attorneys more motivation to present the jury with all the evidence of the case, with a final goal of the jury ultimately…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay will identify issues outside of the primary theme of race that come to light during the court case in…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurors perform a key part in the American arrangement of equity. The assurance of our rights and freedoms is to a great extent accomplished through the collaboration of judge and jury who, cooperating in a typical exertion, put into practice the standards of our extraordinary legacy of flexibility. The judge decides the law to be connected in the case while the jury chooses the truths. Therefore, in an imperative manner, members of the jury turn into a piece of the court itself. The American criminal justice system is the arrangement of practices and organizations of governments steered at maintaining social control, dissuading and moderating wrongdoing, or authorizing the individuals who disregard laws with criminal punishments and restoration exertions.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason that the other members of the jury at first automatically voted “Guilty” was because they let an array of different elements interfere with their moral deliberations. Sometimes people get distracted, like Juror 7 trying to rush through the voting to get to a baseball game he had tickets for. Others can have prejudices against certain people, like Juror 10 who believes that people born in the slum are innately evil from birth and of course they would kill their own father, they are born liars, no question about it. These characters were not upholding their moral integrity in there deliberations.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is a jury? A jury is defined as a body of people (usually twelve in number) sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. A jury may not seem important, but a jury is a very important part of our court system. Information about juries can be found in Amendment 6 and 7 of the United States Constitution. Amendment 6 states that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial while Amendment 7 states that where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays