I would argue that David deSilva tactfully set up his argument and confirmed it with ample evidence. Prior to reading the book, I did not fully understand what social-scientific perspective even meant. However, from the introduction, the author clearly explained what he was trying to accomplish, and went on to accomplish his task in the following five chapters. The author claims that in order to properly understand The Letter to the Hebrews, one must discover the social background of the text; not particularly the exact audience or author, rather the situation they lived in, which gives us an great deal of insight into the book of
I would argue that David deSilva tactfully set up his argument and confirmed it with ample evidence. Prior to reading the book, I did not fully understand what social-scientific perspective even meant. However, from the introduction, the author clearly explained what he was trying to accomplish, and went on to accomplish his task in the following five chapters. The author claims that in order to properly understand The Letter to the Hebrews, one must discover the social background of the text; not particularly the exact audience or author, rather the situation they lived in, which gives us an great deal of insight into the book of