The Most Dangerous Game Movie Analysis

Is it possible to step into a character shoe and feel whatever they are feeling about a certain conflict? If you think you can’t, literacy and life is as close as you will get to it. I believe the most deep connection you can get with your book is in the morning. I personally enjoy reading on my couch, with the sun just rising. Especially if the book is a comedy. Life and literature are connected through characterization, conflict and narration by life being told through literacy and characterization, conflict and narration help by explaining life.

One conflict in the book “The Most Dangerous Game” was when Rainsford was upset at General Zaroff. Rainsford was upset because General Zaroff was killing people. General Zaroff was killing innocent people, sailors. Rainsford said “Killing animals is one thing, killing people is another”. General Zaroff would agree to the fact that what he was doing was wrong. “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and if needed to be taken by the strong” said General Zaroff. The General also said “I am strong, how should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt
why should I not?” This connects with real life when you do something wrong and when someone is upset with you like when Rainsford was upset with General Zaroff.

A part where characterization occurs in “Love, Football, And Other Contact Sport” was when Ken Baur-the main character- called the guy in the computer lab a nerd. Ken Baur told him “ What are you doing in the computer lab after school nerd ?” Ken also told him “It's not like you're going to fail anyways.” The “Nerd” characterized him as well by calling him dumb. “Why are you also here? It's not like you're going to pass.” He also told him “Go home, you can probably do something right there.” This occurs in real life when people make fun of you or call you dumb because of your mistakes or you being wrong like when Ken Baur characterized the “nerd”

In the “Interlopers” the film by Ben Hurst and “The Interlopers” by Saki had comparisons.
Both at the end of the book and the film they were considering becoming friends. “If my men come before yours, i'm telling them to help you up first.” They probably didn't have anyone coming for one another. He tried to weaken him up so that the other character would have thought they were now friends and not enemies. They hated each other. “So you're not killed, as you ought to be, but you're caught.” He was going to kill him when and if he got out before one another. He would've killed him due to their families being enemies for a long time, but then they changed their minds and they seemed like they wanted to have some sort of friendship. This can happen in real life when writing. The language in your writing, the film can also be connected with real life as vision
comparison.

The story “Brother Cousin” written by me was a man vs man conflict. In the story my cousin and his parents had gotten in a big argument. “My dad kicked me out.” I thought he was not telling me the truth at first because he and his dad never seemed to have problems.I was wondering what devastation he could’ve done in order for his parents to kick him out. He also told me, “Don't tell anyone i'm here with you.” I wondered and asked “why?”, he didn't respond. I thought it wasn't that big of a deal and that he was just exaggerating. This scenario can occur in literature when a character gets in an argument with his or her parents and the author expresses their feelings, emotions, and thoughts.

Existence and literature are connected through characterization, disagreement and narration help by explaining. When we read or pick out a book, we tend to choose the ones we connect with the most. We tend to choose books we can relate to. We can enjoy the book better this way, we can put ourselves in the characters shoes and the only way we could do that is life is a part of literature.