Preview

The Nature of Precedent

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Nature of Precedent
Everything in the world repeats, and it is not an exception for law, providing that ‘some degree of certainty’ of law is essential. In English legal system the doctrine, which brings together the past and the present is the doctrine of judicial precedent, which predominant value is irrefutable. However, it is a disputable question, whether the bias of the doctrine on the maintenance of the judicial authority is accurate and contemporary. The nature of precedent can be described by putting the words of Lord Denning in London tramways case:
Rule of precedent is not a rule of law at all, but a practice laid down by the court for its own guidance; and this practice can be amended or altered.
Thus, the precedent should be deemed as ‘judicial practice rather then a doctrine’ . However, the maintenance of this practice should be described in order to discuss its’ value.
The doctrine of precedent is usually defined by the Latin phrase, which has formed the doctrine of precedent as it stands now: stare decisis et non quieta movere. That is ‘to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled matters’, in other words, previous cases may be binding for the consequent cases. The doctrine consists of some elements, the first of which is the role of the judicial hierarchy. To be more precisely, lower courts are bounded by superior courts’ decisions (vertical aspect) and decisions of courts of equal level of the hierarchy (horizontal aspect). These are binding precedents. However, persuasive precedents (decisions of lower courts, Scottish and northern Irish courts, foreign courts in common law) cannot be disregarded .
However, these general statements are not able to tell the judge whether the doctrine should be applied when two cases are similar. The further complexity here is the fact that the particular data changes from case to case and no identical cases can be founded. Here, words of Glanville Williams can be put: ‘cases must be decided the same way when their material



Bibliography: Gearey, A. (2007) The Judicial Practice of Statutory Interpretation (London: University of London). Gearey, A., Morrison, W., Jago, R. (2009), The politics of the common law, perspectives, rights, processes, institutions, (Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish). Goodhart, A. (1931), Essays in Jurisprudence and the Common Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Holland, J., and Webb, J. (2010), Learning Legal Rules, (7nth edn, New York: Oxford university press). McCormick, N. (1987), Why Cases have Rationes and What These Are, in L. Goldstein (ed.), Precedent in Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Williams, G. (1973) Learning the law, (9nth edn, London: Stevens). Practice statement (Judicial Precedent) 1966, p. 1234. R. v A. 2001 2 WLR 1546. Regina v. R. 1991 3 WLR 767. Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Co. 1944 KB 718, at 725.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedents established by prior decisions…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 1: Mahe Vs. Alberta

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Requirement 1: The definition of precedent is an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent or similar circumstances. Requirement 2: Case 1: Mahe v. Alberta Summary: The Mahe v. Alberta case is on the concept of language rights. The ruling is notable, as the court established that section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees minority language education rights to French-speaking communities outside Quebec.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The best way that I can think of to describe precedent is that if someone went to prison for stealing now, but a case from the past is brought up where someone committed the same exact crime but did not get a prison term, this case could be brought up as precedent in order to change the prison sentencing(Miller &…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the heart of the common law system is the doctrine of stare decisis, which translates to “let the decision stand.” Stare decisis creates precedent and thus, when a court has decided a case in a particular way, future cases should be decided the same way. However, stare decisis will only apply if the facts of the case are substantially similar to the prior case. Precedent acts as a major guide for judges when hearing similar cases.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    MGMT 217

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Doctrine where the law of precedent is used in guiding decision making in present cases before the court…

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    adhered to but judges like to put their own spin on things. Precedents are like word games to…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Precedent-a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive ruling…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    | Incorrect. The doctrine of stare decisis attempts to harmonize the results in cases with similar facts. When the facts are sufficiently similar, the same rule is applied. Cases with identical facts could serve as binding authority, but it is more practical to expect to find cases with facts that are not identical but similar--as similar as possible.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Precedent generally refers to some prior action that guides what is done with the action today. As the judges decisions were recorded and passed around, this lead to more continuity and predictability with verdicts in court by judges. As this took place not every case had to be heard if there was an earlier decision on the issue. They referred back to the earlier decision for the case without hearing the current case.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The English law system is one of the major European legal systems which strictly formulated by different procedures. At present, it has spread and implement in many other countries such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. This essay would discuss the three main sources of law, which are Acts of parliament, judiciary precedent and statutory interpretation and also evaluate the relationship between legislation and judicial precedent. Furthermore, the rules of interpretation that contain Literal Rule, Golden Rule and Mischief would be explained in the second part of this essay by several appropriate cases.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Precedent is the way that English Common Law has evolved since the time of Henry II when courts were unified into a national system, making it common throughout England. Integral to it is the Latin phrase ‘stare decisis’ which literally means ‘to stand by what has been decided’. Its meaning in the case of judicial precedent is very similar, that a Judge will go by the same ruling as a previous judge has in the same cases; providing that the precedent comes from a higher or equal court, if it is from a lower court then the precedent is only considered, but may be used. It should be noted that this was not categorically announced by judges until the 19th Century.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    role of precedent

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although the Human Rights Act 1998 has impacted on the judicial understanding of precedent, the underlying features of the doctrine remain unchanged. The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on one of the most fundamental aspects of any legal system and that is, all like cases must be treated alike. It involves the application of the principle of stare decisis i.e to stand by the decided. The doctrine of judicial precedent has always played a pre-eminent role in English law, and it is there to ensure some degree of certainty in law. The American Judge, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. once said “The life of law has not been logic, it has been experience.” Miles Kighton put it rather more cynically in Punch: “A trick which has been tried before, successfully.” Precedent achieves consistency, contributes to the maintenance of a regime of stable laws and ensures that law develops only in accordance with the changing perceptions of the community and therefore; more accurately reflects the morals and expectations of the community.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The doctrine of precedent, or stare decisis, lies at the heart of the English legal system. The doctrine refers to the fact that within the hierarchical structure of the English courts, a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower that is in that hierarchy. In general terms this means that when judges try cases they will check to see if a similar situation has come before a court previously. If the precedent was set by a court of equal or higher status to the court deciding the new case, then the judge in the present case should follow the rule of law established in the earlier case. Where the precedent is from a lower court in the hierarchy, the judge in the new case may not follow but will certainly consider it. It is noted that the doctrine of precedent depends for its operation upon the principle that the courts form a hierarchy with each court standing in a definite position in relation to every other court. The structure of this hierarchy must now be considered for the purposes if the doctrine of precedent. Decisions of the highest courts are binding on lower courts. The House of Lords decisions are binding on all other courts in the legal system, except the House of Lords itself.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A judicial precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. This is known as stare decisis (to stand upon decisions) and by which precedents are authoritative and binding and must be followed.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays