Preview

The Negotiator

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Negotiator
Writing Assignment 1 – Negotiator Directed by F. Gary Gray, “The Negotiator” is a suspenseful action thriller based on a real case experienced by police in St. Louis. In a desperate attempt to prove his innocence, a skilled police negotiator accused of corruption and murder takes hostages in a government office to gain the time he needs to find the truth. Rational choice theory is the criminological approach that retains classical theory’s view of free will but recognizes that circumstances may affect the exercise of personal choice. It views criminals as reasoning human beings who evaluate the total circumstances before choosing to participate in acts that violate the law, including their own personal circumstances (experiences, needs, wants); situational factors (type of security barriers, efficiency of law enforcement); risk of getting caught; seriousness of expected punishment; and value of expected yield. Theorists see the decision to commit crime is influenced by two types of variables: those related to the offense, offense specific, and those related to the offender, offender specific. There is three different ways rational choice theory applies to “The Negotiator”. Firstly, rational choice theory is applied to “The Negotiator” when Danny Roman decided to take up hostages and hold up in the government office. His circumstances of being framed caused him to make a personal decision of taking justice into his own hands, which he concluded would bring him more peace than pain. Secondly, rational choice theory is applied to “The Negotiator” when Chris Sabien decided to help Danny out instead of arresting him. Chris was starting to believe Danny that he was innocent but the FBI stepped in and dismissed Chris so his circumstance caused him to break the law and help Danny uncover the truth. Lastly, rational choice theory is applied to “The Negotiator” when Grant Frost decided to steal the money. Frost felt as though the rewards he would receive from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational choice theory teaches that a person will look at a current situation and decide that an immediate need must be met through illegal action. For example, a normally law abiding citizen is watching his or her family go hungry. To meet the feeding need of his or her family, that person will break the law and steal. Because the benefit (not starving to death) outweighs the risk of being caught.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ucsd Econ 143 Paper 1

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The primary question of this article is based upon the question of what is more useful for deterring crime. Is it a harsher sentence or a greater chance to be caught? There have been multiple papers on this topic, but most of the results have been inconclusive. Therefore, the researcher would like to shed more light upon human decision making in regards to deterring crime. The key benefits of this research would include providing valuable data on how to prevent crime using limited resources. Would it be better to spend more money on punishing a crime, or to spend more money on things such as inspection or law enforcement in order to catch more people committing crimes? This is a very interesting question because crime takes a large toll on national and state governments. Additionally, the decrease of crime would be extremely beneficial for society. Finally, this question tries to find a way to uncover the mystery that is human decision making.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational choice perspective has a six core concepts and four decision making models: criminal behavior is purposive, criminal behavior is rational, criminal decision-making is crime-specific, criminal choices fall into two board groups: ’involvement’ and ‘event’ decisions, there are separate stages of involvement, criminal events unfold in a sequence of stages and decisions(Cornish and Clark). Criminal behavior is purposive when a person decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs and wants. Criminal behavior is rational when an individual commit an offense because of the benefits that might get despite how risky is their action just to achieve that goal. Criminal decision making is crime specific, it’s because each individual…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory is a logically consistent model that claims that a criminal will make a conscious choice to commit a crime, but only if the benefit of committing the crime outweighs the cost. I believe in some cases that criminals are a product of their environment and some criminals are even created due to mental illness. But I mostly believe in the choice theory. From the time we are born, we are taught the difference between right and wrong. Parents, relatives, and other authoritative figures in our lives play a direct role in the path to becoming an adult. These same people are a part of what we consider…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is very easy, now a days with the media, to glamorize crimes and certain cases that have created a spectacle. Many of these famous criminal cases always question the motive of the crime. With this question, come many answers, some leading to theories as to why this particular person would commit the crime they did. Theories try to give an explanation to a cause and link and explain cause and effect. In Criminology, choice theories attempt to explain the reasons a person decided to engage in certain behaviors that caused they to break the law. Some of these theories, such as the rationale theory and sociological theories have a great impact on society as well have affected the criminal justice system.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albeit Rational Choice hypothesis does specify the mental and sociological perspectives that the guilty party brings with them into specific circumstances, it builds these viewpoints in light of figuring whether to carry out the wrongdoing or not, as opposed to what sociological or mental impacts would help towards carrying out the wrongdoing in any case i.e. strain, imbalance, destitution, learned conduct and so forth. Thusly it still does not look to clear up the particular's social circumstances. In this sense as demonstrated by Newburn (2007) it fails to make sufficient note of the structural conditions inside which solitary decision making happens (Newburn, 2007,296) Simply Rational Choice speculation does not elucidate the reasons behind executing wrongdoing regardless. It elucidates the process that happens when there is an open entryway for wrongdoing.…

    • 2658 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIS 170

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They are many Criminal Theories from Psychological theories, social theories, deterrence theories and a few more but let focus on, Choice Theory, known as, rational choice theory. People will engage in delinquents and criminal behavior after weighting consequences and benefits of their actions. According to this review in, motivated people, after consideration, will commit crime if they believe that it will provide immediate benefits without the threat of long-term risk (David, et al, 2006). If people have a choice to do crime or do the right thing, why do they choose crime? What causes a person to choice crime? Poverty, conventional life styles, environment, social life, preexisting physical conditions, genetics or theirs past childhood. Many explanation can be an argument and it cause go on, and on.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When you see the words choice, rational and decision you can put together a definition in itself. Criminals choose to make a decision to act in a certain way, which they see, more benefit than harm. When criminals decided to act out and commit a crime they believe that that is the only rational thing to do, there are no other ways to benefit from a given situation. For example, when criminals steal things to turn around and make money by selling the items on the black market; surely the thought of getting caught has to cross their mind at some point. Maybe whether a security camera might catch their faces, they may leave DNA behind that can be traced back to them or even witness that can place them as the thief. Although they may consider these events, they carry out the crime anyways. Thefts see dollar signs instead of jail time. They see that the chance of getting away with the crime and making all of this money is greater than the chance of getting caught and being punished by law…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term choice theories better yet known as rational choice theories were developed by DR William Glasser in 1995. In Doctor Glasser’s theories he explains human desire to satisfy their genetic needs one has in order to survive. These desires cause humans to make conscious choices and act upon them in any way they decide to ensure the needed desires are satisfied. These theories relate to criminal activity because criminals feel that crime is their only way of fulfilling these desires. The need to survive is a primal instinct shared by all humans. When a person breaks a law, their offense becomes criminal and this affects society through costly trials, the need for more corrections, and housing; thus impacting the economy in a negative way.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today many reasons can be identified to show why individuals commit certain crimes. Often the environment an individual comes from can play an active part, as well as learned behavior from others can play apart. Identifying theories is important when dealing with why an individual may act the way he or she chooses to act, along with criminal acts that make them a participant in an illegal activity. Criminologists play an important part in conducting research for the purposes of introducing a theory into why an individual has participated in certain criminal activity. Although there maybe several theories out there in place, it is the criminologists job to find a main theory that relates to the criminal act that is in question. Criminologists must also discover a way to forecast avenues the offender may choose to carry out his or hers criminal activities (Andrews & Bonta, 2010).…

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay

    • 5411 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Williams, F. P., III, & McShane, M. D. (1988). Criminological Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Wilson, J. Q., & Hernstein, R. (1985). Crime and Human Nature:…

    • 5411 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime has existed for as long as human beings have been able to differentiate between actions that are good and actions that are bad. Whether or not an action that is considered bad is a crime is determined by laws set forth by local, state, or federal governments and the severity of the crime is determined by those whose job it is to interpret the laws, such as a police officer or a judge. While differentiating between what is and is not a crime can be as easy as determining whether or not a law had been broken, figuring out the offender’s motivation for committing a crime is a more complex task. Criminology is a multidisciplinary social science that studies the causes, types, and reactions to criminal behavior. Criminologists attempt to explain a person or group of people’s reasons or motivations behind why a crime was committed using criminological theories. One reason this is done is to aid in the creation of policies within the criminal justice system to better understand why crime is committed and find ways to prevent future crimes from occurring.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arming Law-Abiding Theory

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rational choice theory would suggest that these conditions force the criminal to weigh the probabilities of success in committing crime against the probability…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics