Preview

The Only Micro Theory 'Labeling': An Interactionist Perspective

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Only Micro Theory 'Labeling': An Interactionist Perspective
The only Micro Theory ‘Labeling’, is an interactionist perspective, which focuses on the interactions of the individual, compared to the Macro Theories of conflict. Looking at the way a person’s self identity and behaviour can be influenced by the terms used to classify or describe them. Concepts of the self fulfilling prophecy, whereby a person can be influenced into becoming what they have been labeled, and stereotyping by negatively labeling minority groups. Judging deviant behaviour as deviation from the cultural norms, the majority bestowing a label or stigma upon those who deviate, those labels leading to changes in their self concept and social identity. Deviant or criminal acts do not occur naturally, but are determined by societal norms and the reactions of its members in different situations and contexts (Giddens, 1989).
Giddens, A. (1989) Sociology. (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Polity Press.
…show more content…
Social construction of deviance requiring two groups; one group lacking power and the other with higher power, having negative responses to deviances and criminal labeling. Becker (1973) refers to the deviant career, having to pass through stages before the label takes effect. He concludes that those who are identified as deviants in society are not the only ones who consider committing deviant acts, instead he suggests consideration should be given to why people conform, as the impulse to deviate is a human trait (Kirby et al., 2000). The concept of a deviant career allowed Becker to suggest deviance as being learned, not just a label. This supported by the self fulfilling prophecy whereby those labeled assume the labels characteristics and that person joining together with those similarly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The labelling theory is a micro interactionist approach, this is because it focuses on how individuals construct the social world through face-face interactions. It recognises the concept of the ‘procedural self’ where ones identity is continuously constructed and recognised in interaction with significant others, this results in the individual’s behaviour, including that related to crime and deviance.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologists would define labelling as a process of attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group. For example, police officers may label a youth a “trouble maker”. Agents of social control define an individual which leads to a person being labelled by those who have the power to make the label stick and therefore the individual is seen as a deviant. In his essay I will look at the work of Howard Becker, Jock young and Edwin M. Lemert who look at the effects of the labelling theory on individuals and their contributions on how an individual becomes a deviant.…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    howard beckers theroy

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Howard Becker’s labeling theory starts off by identifying the deviant. Once you get caught doing something, you are identified and labeled for it; it can either be formal as labeled under the law or informal as in labeled with in family and friends. For example, I had two very good friends in high school, Serafin and Brian. They were best buds and always did everything together. Like many teenagers in high school they started to experiment with drugs. Like every other day they would both go smoke weed and get high in the alley afterschool. No one ever walked through the alley unless you were doing drugs or something but that day the police were roaming around the block because a robber had broke into someone’s house, Serafin and Brian happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The cops drove through the alley and had seen both of them smoking, their first reaction was to run but where? When there wasn’t anywhere to run, it was a dead end. So they quickly jumped tried to jump the fence while Brian jumped the fence successfully and got to runaway, Serafin wasn’t so fortunate and ended up getting his pants stuck to the fence. As soon as Serafin got arrested he was immediately identified and labeled. As for Brian he didn’t get caught and never got labeled even though he was there and performing the same deviant actions as Serafin.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling theorists are concerned with how and why certain people and actions come to be labelled as criminal or deviant, and what effects this has on those who are labelled as such. As stated in Item A, labelling theory is focused with how individuals construct society based on their interactions with each other.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.Giddens, Anthony and Duneier, Mitchell and Appelbaum, Richard P. Introduction To Sociology New York W.W. Norton and Company 2003…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Labeling theory is based on the idea that behaviors are deviant only when society labels them as deviant. As such, conforming members of society, who interpret certain behaviors as deviant and then attach this label to individuals, determine the distinction between deviance and non-deviance.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal career is composed of re-offenses due to lack of social integration, exclusion from mainstream structures and in some cases renegation of the societal norms. The deviant is theorized to perceive no other choice but further deviance because the label attached to their discovery turns them into untrustworthy or even dangerous individuals. The social response only creates a backlash that manifests as acceptance of the label, retreatment from society or…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology and Nell

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Haaland, B., & Schaefer, R. (Ed.). (2009). Sociology: a brief introduction. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hair

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Giddens, Anthony, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Applebaum and Deborah Carr. 2012. “Introduction to sociology.” New York: W.W. Norton and Company. Eighth ed., pp. 15-78.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nursing research.

    • 5090 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Haralambos, M. and Holborn, M. (1995). Sociology: Themes And Perspectives. 4th Edition. London: Harper Collins.…

    • 5090 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling Theory Analysis

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It could be said that the labelling theory is subject to several limitations and shortfalls, the largest of these is that it does not account for the initial motivation towards deviance. Further to this, this theory may be better placed to explain certain types of crimes more convincingly than others. An example of this would be theft as once an individual has been convicted and subsequently labelled as a criminal, they would find it significantly harder to find employment resulting in an increased likelihood of subsequent…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Labeling Theory Of Crime

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Labeling theory proposes that a deviant label given to a person by society can be given after a person commits a crime and proceeds to be active in delinquent activities because of the label or the label brought onto that person can cause them to commit the crime the label describes (Akers, Sellers, & Jennings, 2017). In 1951, Edwin M. Lemert created the terms primary and secondary deviance. Primary deviance is meant to be before the label is given to a person and seems to be unorganized and inconsistent (Akers, Sellers, & Jennings, 2017). People who commit primary deviance are normally found to be conventional citizens, however after they have committed crime and society has labeled them this turns into secondary deviance, which people would not have engaged in if the label society gave them was never assigned (Akers, Sellers, & Jennings, 2017;…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labeling Theory

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conflict and radical theories ascribe several categories of crime and criminal laws to the self-interest of powerful segments of society. In common with labeling theory, the amount of objective evidence available to document these social process theories is limited and inconsistent. In the ideal and harmonious family, parents refrain from affixing labels to their children, either good or bad. It is understood that, taken to an extreme, such verbal reinforcers can easily become "self fulfilling prophecies." Supporters of labeling theory believe that a person with a deviant self-image will then suffer from reduced conventional opportunities. Over time, legal processing is felt to "steer" the individual farther and farther down the road to increased lawlessness. Future criminal offenses become statistically more likely, according to some. The risk of possible discrimination in the application of labels and legal sanctions is felt to be balanced/affirmed if the potential for continued criminality by the individual can be prophylactically curtailed. The label may reduce the overall number of victims.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays