Preview

The Originalist View Of The Constitution

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Originalist View Of The Constitution
Essay 1:
The selection of a supreme court justice is usually dependent on how the judge views the constitution. There are two main theories of how the constitution is viewed. The first theory is an originalism view. This views the constitution rigidly, and that America has to enforce the constitution by the original meaning. Originalism ensures that the original meaning is enforced, by using the old dictionary definitions if the words. This originalist interpretation is more common amongst conservative judges. The next theory is the living constitution. The living constitution views the constitution vaguely. It is done this was to promote human dignity in light of society’s changing values and needs. This living constitution interpretation
…show more content…
How that is determining the politician’s experience in a leadership position, their values, and the political issues they align themselves with. With that said voters are irrational. Voter would like to think they can make rational decision based on small amounts of information. According to campaign researchers Sniderman, Brody, and Tetlock, it can be determined that voters use heuristics or shortcuts in place of political knowledge to make decisions when it comes time to vote, this can be called a “bounded rationality (Allen & Wilson, 2010). Voters take short cuts in order to avoid wasting time learning about every issue and every candidate. Often times voters will look into the what part best a lines with their beliefs. Then from there voter often listens to elite’s clues into which candidate they should vote for, such as the NRA backing a pro-gun candidate. Voters generally do not use heuristics thoughtful or rationally. They often just collect a small amount of information and accept is as fact because they lack the political knowledge to use the heuristics. By this I mean, voters do not always know about the political topics such as the economy and who does and doesn’t not have the power to influence the economy. An example of this is the common misconception that the president has control over the economy, when in reality the president can recommend how the government spend money but the congress has the ultimate control over the finances of the government. It could not be their fault though. They may lack the rational information to make an informed decision. If they only have access one particular political news station or radio station, they may lack alternate facts, not manipulated by elites, that could inform them better. Mark Twain said it best, “It isn’t what we don’t know that gives us trouble, it’s what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Laurence H. Tribe is a critically acclaimed author and professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard. His speech at the Ford Hall Forum was a summarization of his book “The Invisible Constitution.” In it, Tribe proposes a new way at looking at the Constitution we have come to worship. More than a tangible document, the true power of the Constitution is the series of implications that exist in it; the “invisible” aspects.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The correlations between a candidate running for election and a voter who participates in the election, in terms of support and participation, often involve the use of shared attributes to explain how said correlations have an impact on the outcome of the election. In a representative democracy such as the United States, the belief is that those who vote in elections wield the power to select government officials, who then in turn create, uphold, or interpret the law of the land accordingly. Those who participate in elections, therefore, believe that the candidate they select will make decisions or introduce legislature according to the beliefs that those who voted share with one another. A voter or a group of voters are more likely to support a candidate if they share at least one attribute with one another. In order to understand how candidate selection based on belief is accomplished, an account of how exactly comparisons between the candidate and the voter must be made to accommodate a multitude of potential attributes. Both physical attributes, such as race, and non-physical attributes, such as political ideology, can be used to compare and contrast a candidate with a voter. With this data, we can then predict the outcome between a certain attribute that a voter shares (or does not share) with a candidate and the support that candidate receives from that conglomerate.…

    • 3394 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Voters know how their elected representatives vote on important policy issues and are more likely to reelect them because they agree with their stands.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional interpretation has been among the foremost politically pressing issues since the moment the ink from the founder’s pens dried. The vague, broad wording – originally intended by the founders to allow the constitution to grow with our fledgling democracy – has led to intricate disputes arising over issues such as the true meaning of the word “commerce” and the intended extend of federal jurisdiction in Marbury v. Madison. After over two centuries of contestation, the court has organically settled on two basic methods of interpretation, each championed by leading Supreme Court justices: Originalism and Non-Originalism. Despite arising from individual personal ideologies of justices, they have come to be the defining methodologies…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the Constitution be Followed as Originally Written or Reinterpreted for Current Times? The constitution is a document where the rules for the United States are written. This is the most important document in American history because it tells a whole population what is right and what is wrong. There are arguments how the U.S. government should stop adding changes to the constitution and keep it as originally written. The constitution should be reinterpreted for current times because the founding fathers were not aware of the events that were going to happen in the future like freeing African Americans, banning gun stores, and giving the women the right to vote.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution is the fundamental framework for our country and the most important document in its history. It establishes the form of the national government and defines the rights and liberties of the American people. The Constitution has survived and stayed current for over 220 years because it was written in such a way that gave it the ability to adapt to changing times while adhering to basic principles. This capacity to adapt makes the Constitution a living document.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America is the world’s largest democracy. Every four years they hold presidential elections in which the public is to determine by vote who wins. The American people through decision and judgment cast out there vote to who they believe is the best person to lead their country. They must base their decision on what they see through media reports on television, newspapers and what they hear on the radio and from fellow citizens. The decision in the end is made through the influences of the 4 ways of knowing: emotion, language, perception and reason. Emotion is a key way of knowing as it forms the ground base for weather they like the candidate or not. Language and reason form the base of the decision as they convey the aims of each candidate through the reasons they give and the language they use to present those reasons. They perceive how the candidates take action in their campaign and in the debates to guide themselves to what they think is the right decision.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is a document representing the supreme law do the land. Supreme Court Justices are vested with the power of evaluating this document with corresponding laws and coming up with judgment on their relevancy and constitutionality. However, justices often find themselves at odds on how to decipher the documents original meaning; much like in Obergefell vs Hodges, where Justices Kennedy and Roberts disagree on how the Constitution should be interpreted. In a "Concise Guide to the Federalist Papers," written by Gregory Maggs, the “original meaning” of the constitution is broken down into three different definitions that can be used as foundations for assessing the logic that stems from court opinions. Based off…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The adaptive method makes the Supreme Court a more controlling institution in the U.S government is one better than the other? It just depends on the person on which ones may be better but in my opinion the adaptive interpretation gives the government more control and allows them to interpret the Constitution however may see the Constitution, where an originalist view holds government accountable for holding the constitution to its unique intent. In my opinion the originalist view is better because it confines our government from their own interpretations. Originalist interprets the constitution factually. What it declares should be law. An adaptive takes the posture that the founding fathers lived 300 years ago and we need to attempt to make…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges that used originalist interpretation judge cases by what they think that the Founding Fathers intended at the time the Constitution was drafted. This means that not only do they look to the Constitution for answers, but also sources like the Federalist papers, letters written by the Founding Fathers, and even Senate history notes when it comes to cases dealing with the Amendments. This form allows an interpretation to be as true to the Constitution as possible. Justice Scalia is an example of an originalist.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Constitution’s case, the group that discusses the meaning of the law is the judiciary branch of the government, whose job is to interpret the Constitution. A Supreme Court who interprets the Constitution loosely often secures more liberties of the country’s citizens, one of the factors in the government’s role. An example of a case where this can be seen is Roe V. Wade. This case secured, in a 7-2 decision, that the right to an abortion was a fundamental right of the American people. The argument for the majority opinion was that, even though the word abortion or privacy is not found in the Constitution, "the right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the district court determined, in the Ninth Amendment’s reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy”.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scalia classified himself as an originalist. He stated, “I am one of a small but hardy group of judges and academics in the United States who subscribe to the principle of constitutional interpretation known as originalism. Originalists believe that the provisions of the Constitution have a fixed meaning when they are adopted, nothing more, and nothing less. ”(Scalia 188). Many people support the idea of the living constitution, but Scalia was not one of them.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Through this quote, Madison is cementing the understanding that the founders wanted to keep the Constitution accessible to Americans of all upbringings. The argument for Original intent refuses to acknowledge that the document’s conciseness of the document is a leading factor on how it can be interpreted. It was never meant to be a closed text, it was made to be expanded on. Another topic that is of importance to the living constitutionalism argument is the ambiguity of the language made out throughout the text.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On a daily bases we are faced with many ethical issues. In today’s society, ethical dilemmas are seen as relative. What happens when you have to make a dire decision that does not only effect you, but the people around you. What happens when you have to make a decision for a chronically ill loved one? How do you handle the situation? In the case of Euthanasia, there is no room for error or for extreme thought processes. When thinking ethically and morally, one must have balance to determine proper judgement.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays