Preview

Why Do Congressional Incumbents Have An Advantage In Elections

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Congressional Incumbents Have An Advantage In Elections
Congressional incumbents have an advantage in elections for the following reasons:
Voters know how their elected representatives vote on important policy issues and are more likely to reelect them because they agree with their stands.
The incumbents also face weak in terms of experience and less known opponents.
Incumbents are also already well-known, so they do not have to spend too much in campaigning.
How are Congressional districts drawn and by whom? What are the consequences of this?
Congressional districts are drawn based on Census data and they are usually drawn by state legislatures.
Explain why incumbents may lose their reelection bids.
Incumbents may lose their reelection bids for reasons such as the incumbent may be affected by
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Political Gerrymandering
    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Study: Political Gerrymandering

    Political gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral district lines in a manner that discriminates against a political party. When used to insure party success, political gerrymandering is usually legal but can be contested. At this time it is legal to draw district lines to protect incumbents of both parties.…

    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Government 2302- Exam 1 Study Guide
    • 5850 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Government 2302- Exam 1 Study Guide

    The constituents of a district are the residents in an area for the elected official.…

    • 5850 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries
    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Government 2302 Revision Notes
    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Government 2302 Revision Notes

    Redistricting- is the process of redrawing congressional district to reflect increase or decrease in seats allotted to the state as well as population shifts within the state. The state decides how many seats a state receive.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: The Redistricting Game
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering: The Redistricting Game

    It is like a game, call it the redistricting game. Gerrymandering is an act that tries to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group. Although the Supreme Court ruled gerrymandering unconstitutional in 1986, it could possibly challenge in court. To sum gerrymandering up in a sentence. The main purpose of redistricting is to allow fewer districts for a politician opponent. They take parts of a states that they feel like would think, communicate, have the same skin color or act like there opponent and the attempt to make as few districts including them as possible. Doing this gives that candidate a higher chance of getting votes of the people in other districts. Virginia is considered to be one of the most gerrymandered…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Incumbents
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Incumbents

    An incumbent is defined as the person currently holding office. Through a political lense, incumbency has proven to be a significant advantage in the field of reelection.The graph provided above is hard evidence that incumbency often results in reelection. From 1948 to 1996 it is obvious that incumbency rates in the House of Representatives, and the Senate are high. In 1960 over 90% of incumbents in the Senate were elected, and in throughout 1948 to 1996 the House has steadily averaged around 90% of incumbents reelected. Another fact being, rates of incumbents reelected have increased over time in both the House and Senate. I can only imagine that these rates will continue to increase with the growth of media over time.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines

    Each decade politicians become wound up for the political war of who will win the control of Congress for the next decade or possibly longer. One of the most effective ways of manipulating elections, shy of corruption, is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering (pronounced “garrey” mandering not “jerry” mandering) is the government’s advantage of one political party over another. It is the process of drawing weirdly shaped lines to define a district. The term is derived from Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the founding fathers, who drew a weirdly shaped district that resembles a salamander, it was henceforth dubbed gerrymandering. One of the unfortunate truths in American society and political life is that although we are told that each individual vote counts, the reality is that sometimes people’s votes are less equal. Political power in Congress is based upon population, the bigger the state is, for example California and Texas, the bigger the reward is of more seats in Congress, rather than Rhode Island or Delaware. The states with a higher population are appointed more seats and they get those seats from the states with fewer people that are counted from the census. The effervescent image of American democracy is that of a vibrant government that is open to change and subject to will of its voters, unfortunately this is an illusion. The problem with redrawing lines is that it eliminates the evaluation process that the public has by preventing competitive elections. I feel like it is just another loophole, oppressive scheme for political officials to try and dictate against us. Politicians seem to have the mutual feeling that it is a birth right for them to represent certain districts but we are still in a democracy, not a dictatorship or a monarchy, we have the right to elect who we feel represents our communities voice most appropriately and violating that right by eliminating the person we feel best suites us from our district it is violating our Constitutional and…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government
    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze the factors that have led to the decline in party influence in Congress.
    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze the factors that have led to the decline in party influence in Congress.

    In Congress, reforms democratized or 'opened up' selection procedures to broader participation. Senior members found themselves surrendering committee chairmanships to unknown newcomers. Whips found it harder to enforce party discipline and junior members increasingly pursued their own personal projects to gain media attention and impress their constituency voters. Congress members have much to gain, in publicity and in tangible rewards (grants for their constituencies) from unpredictable behavior.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?

    Gerrymandering Research Paper Why was there a need to draw lines that create voting districts? The constitution set up the initial way each state would be represented and gave representatives (House of Representatives) that were determined according to population and guaranteed the number of representatives (Senate) that each state would have. The lines were needed to give equal representation for all the districts. Gerrymandering is the illegal practice of redrawing the congressional district lines in such a way as to favor one political party over another. In 1812, then Governor Eldridge Gerry signed a bill that redistricted Massachusetts.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    0 4 Members Of The US Congress Are Too Concerned With Local Matters And Not Concerned Enough With Issues Affecting The Whole Country
    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages

    0 4 Members Of The US Congress Are Too Concerned With Local Matters And Not Concerned Enough With Issues Affecting The Whole Country

    So, for the constituency this is the best thing as their representative is focused solely on what is needed for them, therefore being very responsive to whatever they need. However and in contrast as the Senate have a longer term they almost have a sense of relief and stability within their membership.…

    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros and Cons of Term Limits
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Term Limits

    Term limits have been very controversial over the years. They have been both favored and opposed. Most people are in favor of term limits because incumbents are reelected for years and years. Very few people are opposed of term limits and most of those who are work for Congress. Some very interesting arguments in term limits favor have been the fact that these politicians are making careers out of their positions are not getting anything accomplished because they have no time limit. Experience can be both a positive and a negative to term limits. The positive being new ideas and fresh faces being in Congress. The negative would be that the more experienced legislators would be thrown out and would result in a loss of talent and waste of knowledge. More opposing theories would be that not only would term limits get rid of all the “bad apples” but it would also get rid of the better Congressmen as well. Most of Congress who oppose term limits fear that putting new people in office could wreck our government system.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fishbowl: Nomination And Election Process Analysis
    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Fishbowl: Nomination And Election Process Analysis

    Elections enable voters to select leaders and to hold them accountable for their performance in office. Where the electoral process is competitive and forces candidates or parties to expose their records and future intentions to popular scrutiny, elections serve as forums for the discussion of public issues and facilitate the expression of public opinion. Elections also provide political education for citizens and ensure the responsiveness of democratic governments to the will of the people. They also serve to legitimize the acts of those who wield power, a function that is performed to some extent even by elections that are noncompetitive.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments for and Against Term Limits
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments for and Against Term Limits

    Those opposed to term limits primarily support the premise that replacing seasoned experienced politicians with inexperienced members that are unfamiliar with the issues is detrimental to moving things forward. It takes years of experience to get up to speed on the issues and the rules of government. Limiting terms would be restrictive and eliminate the “good” guy politicians that are doing a good job representing the people. It is common that term limited politicians are not as committed toward the end of their term because they don’t have to worry about their record of accomplishments for re-election.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immigration to the United States
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Immigration to the United States

    | The apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives is calculated based on a state’s adult population, regardless of legal status.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More