Preview

Pros and Cons of Term Limits

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros and Cons of Term Limits
The Favoring and Opposing of Term Limits

Term limits have been very controversial over the years. They have been both favored and opposed. Most people are in favor of term limits because incumbents are reelected for years and years. Very few people are opposed of term limits and most of those who are work for Congress. Some very interesting arguments in term limits favor have been the fact that these politicians are making careers out of their positions are not getting anything accomplished because they have no time limit. Experience can be both a positive and a negative to term limits. The positive being new ideas and fresh faces being in Congress. The negative would be that the more experienced legislators would be thrown out and would result in a loss of talent and waste of knowledge. More opposing theories would be that not only would term limits get rid of all the “bad apples” but it would also get rid of the better Congressmen as well. Most of Congress who oppose term limits fear that putting new people in office could wreck our government system.
“By shortening congressional terms, proponents hope to make sure that nobody sees becoming a congressional representative as a viable lifetime career choice, leading to more people who get into politics for noble reasons instead of a simple desire for power.” Many politicians who have been in office for such a long time start to get comfortable. Some become known as career-politicians. If there were set terms on these politicians, then they may be more focused on getting issues resolved within an allotted amount of time. “Not only are term-limit laws helping to diversify state legislatures, they are also allowing "regular" citizens to run for state office, say supporters. As a result, citizens--not just career politicians--are playing a large role in the political process, advocates say.” Term limits would give everyday citizens a choice to participate in political roles instead of the same

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Federalist No. 72, Alexander Hamilton states that re-eligibility should be ensured in order to prevent an executive from extending his term in office unconstitutionally. Hamilton presents five effects that would occur if a president would only be allowed to serve for a single term. Some of the effects that Hamilton presented are, a reduction in the president’s motivation to be on his best behavior since he would not be concerned about getting re-elected. Another issue that would result if re-eligibility would be denied is that if a president who holds office is obsessed with wealth he might get involved in corruption since he would soon be prohibited from office. The author’s purpose is to establish re-eligibility in order for an executive…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though not affecting any candidates in the field, having an amendment be ratified during the election cycle is historical. The twenty second Amendment was ratified during this election. This laid out the two elected term limit for presidents. (1948 Presidential Election)…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An incumbent is defined as the person currently holding office. Through a political lense, incumbency has proven to be a significant advantage in the field of reelection.The graph provided above is hard evidence that incumbency often results in reelection. From 1948 to 1996 it is obvious that incumbency rates in the House of Representatives, and the Senate are high. In 1960 over 90% of incumbents in the Senate were elected, and in throughout 1948 to 1996 the House has steadily averaged around 90% of incumbents reelected. Another fact being, rates of incumbents reelected have increased over time in both the House and Senate. I can only imagine that these rates will continue to increase with the growth of media over time.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fathers of Confederation conceived of the Senate as a “chamber of sober second thought.” However, almost ever since its creation, as the unelected arm of the legislature, people have suggested ways in which to reform the upper house. Concerns of illegitimate representation, party loyalty, and patronage are the main reasons the argument for change continues. This paper aims to review a couple of recent reform proposals, and then argue, leaving constitutional practicality behind, that the Senate should receive a major overhaul in how it is formed and represented.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Term Limits Case Study

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    May 22, 1995, in the U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton case the Supreme Court ruled that states cannot impose qualifications on future members of Congress stricter than what is stated in the Constitution. The case was brought to the Supreme Court when the state of Arkansas put an amendment into their state constitution that limited the number of terms any Federal Congressional and Senate candidate from Arkansas could serve. The Supreme Court ruled that “state-imposed term limits were an imperfect, and probably temporary, effort to reform a Congress whose members have become almost permanently ensconced on Capitol Hill” (Zubler 1995). Because term limits can limit the opportunity for someone to grow into their government position, limit citizen’s rights to select their own representatives, and eliminate any incentive representatives have to meet the needs of the public,…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supporters quote Continental Congress member Thomas Jefferson who in 1776 warned of the dangers if representatives remained in office too long and suggested a proposed limit to congressional tenure. Jefferson stated “to prevent every danger which might arise to American freedom by continuing too long in office the members of the Continental Congress… shall not have served in that office longer than two years” (Jefferson). I have identified three main pros that term limit supporters rely on to defend their position, yet they tend to overlook the cons that occur with term limits in…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Athenos Hummus

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Fullerton (2010). Marketing through Sports Using Mainstream Strategies. (pp.60-91). International Edition. Sports Marketing. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Presidency as a whole has changed in many ways throughout the course of history; specifically, in the relationship between the president and the public. The Constitution is vague when it describes communication of the president: a president must say why they veto a bill, and they must inform the public on the state of the union (Ellis 82). President George Washington had the task of establishing how the president would interact with the public. During the early days of the presidency the President communicated seldomly with the public; this is because the president was supposed to be held at a higher standard than the public, and they were supposed to communicate with Congress. Washington worked towards having the office of the president…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having two terms is enough time for a president to accomplish something. In your first term, you study and do research on what needs to be done. At the end of the first term and throughout the second term, you should do whatever it is that you are trying to accomplish for the country. I am grateful for what our founding fathers have created by limiting the amount of terms…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our Founding Fathers never expected Congressmen to serve life-long terms. They had intended on a system of citizens serving for a few years and then returning to their respective communities. Nowadays, our representatives are making permanent careers out of Congressional positions. They are able to maintain their place in government and make a living off of pay raises and benefits. Polling of voters has shown that there is a general distaste for political careerism.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There should be an implementation of term limits in Congress to better maintain power. Some of the benefits of term limits bring include less corruption and corporate influence, along with fresh new ideas. Term limitations ensure our representatives will pay more attention to us, their constituents. Since our government cannot be trusted sometimes, term limits prevent someone from getting too powerful. Therefore, term limits have proven to be useful and should be…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Legislative branch, or Congress, is one of the most, if not the most, key provisions established in the Constitution of the United States. The organization, powers, and limitations of the Congress can be found throughout the first Article of the United States Constitution. Congress is made up of two bodies, the House of Representatives, composed of 435 members, and the Senate, composed of 100 members. This bicameral legislature is established under Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution (U.S. Const. art. I, § 1). Unlike the presidency, members of Congress are not limited in the number of terms in which they can serve. In contemporary politics, the two major parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, generally fight for control…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For members of Congress. It is at this time when all the members of the…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics