In the book “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin she explains the constitution from start to finish from how it all began, to the debates inside the convention and finally the end product. Berkin takes the reader and puts him directly in the middle of the convention of 1786; throughout the book you can feel the excitement, the frustration, the tensions between delegates and the overall commitment to making a new government work for all.…
Charles Beard’s article, Framing the Constitution, alleges the members of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were “disinterested” in providing basic rights for citizens. He stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were only concerned in improving their own economic well–being and personal agendas. Therefore, providing information of the events that led up to the Philadelphia Convention and an overview of the Constitution will dismiss his statements, and state his article was a self-serving, conspiracy theory.…
How did the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the period immediately following it deal with the issue of the debate between those who supported a strong central government and those who wanted more power given to the states?…
Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…
The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…
The United States Constitution is an extremely valuable document .The constitution assisted in creating our modern day United States; The constitution assisted in establishing our administration giving inhabitants privileges and liberty. The Constitution was put in place to give citizens a voice on how the country should be run and to establish laws and principles. There were five manuscripts that were very important in establishing the constitution, (A)The Magna Carta,1215 (B) The Mayflower Compact 1620, (c) The Declaration of Independence 1776, and (D) The Articles of confederation 1777 and (E) The Federalists Papers 1787-1788. The first document was the Magna Carta.…
Because the Constitution gave the Presidents such limited power, Congress dominated the executive branch until the 1900’s when Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson asserted themselves providing the turning point in the 1930s for presidential power. Franklin Roosevelt, gained power through his New Deal programs to regulate the economy and the war required that he lead the country in foreign affairs as well. By these things the power of the president has increased massively in both constitutional and evolutionary ways. As the power increased the presidents decided to be surrounded with advisors to that are now called cabinet. Currently The Cabinet includes the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments…
Chapter 9 The Confederation and the Constitution AP US History 1.|Abigail Adams| 2.|Daniel Shays| 3.|Alexander Hamilton| 4.|James Madison| 5.|Gouverneur Morris| 6.|Thomas Jefferson| 7.|primogeniture| 8.|federation| 9.|checks and balances| 10.|sovereignty| 11.|“mobocracy”| 12.|consent of the governed| 13.|republicanism| 14.|states' rights|…
However, the historical fact remains that Virginia did accept the constitution, and during a time in which ratification was not a foregone conclusion. The success of the Federalist movement in Virginia begs the question, were the writings and actions of the Anti-Federalists indelibly relevant to the course of American history? I argue that the answer is unquestionably yes, for while they did not successfully refute the Federalist cause, they created a space for the address of their own concerns in the push for the Bill of Rights. The intensity of Anti-Federalist fervor and complexity of its concerns made the issue of forming a bill of rights even more pressing for the founding fathers. Thus, in its formation, the Virginia Anti-Federalist movement achieved success in its own right.…
Thesis: The delegates of the Constitutional Convention could have best balanced the power between the states and the Federal government by better compromising on the ideas of the federalists and Anti-Federalist by weakening the centralized power of the government, and protecting the people’s liberty.…
1. What are American foreign policy terms? Give an example of one use of hard power and one use of soft power in promoting each goal?…
When thinking about the influential people who shaped America, many people instantly think about our Founding Fathers and all the other individuals who have passed and created laws in order to make our nation what it is today. However, what about the writers this great land has seen? With their brilliant minds and their talent to document and create stories, why don’t these authors get the same recognition as the Founding Fathers do when they have just as much significance? Writers have the power to transform texts and persuade people to think a certain way or have a certain opinion due to the way that they write. Isn’t persuading the minds of the nation and offering new ideas on topics just as important as the Founding Fathers creating this nation? Although most writers have significant impacts on their time period, one time period in particular, the 1920s, saw one of the most influential groups of writers this nation has ever known. Referred to as the “Lost Generation,” this time included writers such as F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and Gertrude Stein. Overall, despite the title of the “Lost Generation,” these writers were actually not lost,…
The drafting of the new federal Constitution for the infant United States drew many staunch lines between federalists and antifederalists. These differences proved to be vast and in most cases complex, the antifederalists opposed the newly drafted constitution, while the federalists pushed for its ratification. These two primary views of how the United States government should function, made the ratification of the Constitution by no means a guarantee in 1787. Thus, the criticisms made by the antifederalists and the retorts returned by the federalists echoed the uncertainty of the United States in its infancy, plus these arguments demonstrated the blurred views on the “good society” and developed the Constitution into a document that preserved…
During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…
Although the thirteen colonies were already free and sovereign states, they were not a united nation. These colonies had been governed since 1781 by the Articles of Confederation, a constitution that established a weak central government. According to the Articles of Confederation, Congress, which was composed of representatives of the people, could not enact laws or raise taxes. Moreover, there was no federal judiciary or permanent executive power. Each state was almost independent, meaning that it could even establish its own fiscal barriers.…