The Orwellian Big Brother Analysis

reassess their values and beliefs in light of contrarian evidence and arguments, and advance in intellectual maturity. This is one key brand of academia: the search for truth, and this cannot occur when individuals are convinced they already possess it. With intellectual enterprise narrowing as individuals dismiss and suppress dissent, the hallmarks of wisdom with its rudimentary tenet of true plurality: active seeking of and fair consideration of opposing views too falls prey to the conformist state.
The Orwellian Big Brother
Orwell bifurcates the populace of Oceania through class distinctions: the first being the upper class comprising Inner party members, the second middle class composed of Outer Party members, and the lower class as the proletariats or recurrently, the ‘proles’. The methodology of the state in surveilling and
Primarily by establishing from anticipatory conformity an ideological standard, and second by permitting all to monitor and report those around them for thoughtcrime. The rendering of independent thinking as criminal permits punitive legislative action vis-à-vis dissident thoughts. The concern of the paper is the public pressure underlying the system of Thoughtcrime, wherein even an “. . .eavesdropping little sneak – ‘child hero’ was the phrase generally used – had overheard some comprising remark and denounced its parent to the Thought Police” (Orwell, 1984 32). Furthermore, as is with anticipatory conformity, the individual begins to take action to eschew repercussion through crimestop, wherein occurs the erasure of dissenting thought outside the frames of the Overton Window of Political Possibilities, which states that though there exists a wide range of thoughts on the political spectrum, only those within a small frame or window remains politically permissible in any period (Russell). Crimestop prevents the shift of the Overton Window through