Preview

The Ottoman Empire: Tolerant In The 16th-17th Century

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ottoman Empire: Tolerant In The 16th-17th Century
If you know much about the Ottoman Empire, you know that they are usually considered a tolerant society. But what was it exactly that made them such a tolerant society? You can’t specify one or two things that they did, because they did a lot that could be considered tolerance, especially in the 16th-17th Century era. From the beginning of its society, the Ottoman Empire was always tolerant. They may not have been doing it in the most “civil” way, but they were at least giving people a chance to follow their own culture. One example would be the fact that many Jews who had been kicked out of Spain, “flocked” to the Ottoman lands, and they were not forced to convert to Islam, but them and any other non-Muslims were forced to pay a Jitza, or a tax for religious tolerance. …show more content…
This eliminated the millet system from the Ottoman Empire. The Millet system created religiously based communities that operated autonomously, so people were organized into societies, on often received privileges, based on the church they followed. This clause terminated the privileges of these communities and constructed a society where all followed the same law. As millets were generally autonomous, there were many differences in law and punishment from millet to millet which went against the idea of equality of everyone. The first declaration of the Tanzimat Period, the Hatt-ı Sharif, fixed this so that everyone was to be treated equally and with respect, including such clauses as No one will be permitted to assail the honor of any one, whosoever he may be and These imperial concessions extend to all our subjects, whatever religion or sect they may belong to; and they will enjoy them without any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ap World History Dbq Essay

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages

    22. Which group represented such extreme conservatism within the Ottoman Empire that reform was frustrated? The intense conservatism of powerful groups such as the Janissaries, and to a lesser extent the religious scholars, reinforced this fatal attitude. Through much of the 17th and 18th centuries, these groups blocked most of the Western-inspired innovations that reform-minded sultans and their advisors tried to…

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both European and Mughal rulers in the sixteenth century demonstrated a high degree of religious tolerance.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Asia. The Turks slowly started taking over west then, started taking over the south starting the crusades. Acrobatiq (2014).Eventfully the Turks moved into the Holy Land and Jerusalem. The Greek Emperor Alexius didn’t like the idea of the Turks taking over, so he went and discussed it with Pope Urban II. The Pope wanted to form a army to fight against the Muslims and take back the holy land. This is when the armies Of Christians from Western Europe answered Pope Urban II’s request of“This assignment was to be a Holy War, or crusade. The Pope promised that those who died in this quest would go directly to heaven.” Acrobatiq (2014).…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CCOT Ottoman Religious

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the beginning of this timeframe, the Ottoman Sultans have already been successful at re-establishing an Islamic Empire in the Middle East.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Collaboration Assignment

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Answer: Historical Turkey created a strong influence in the Islamic beliefs early on in its establishment. In addition to creating a religious backbone, the Turks had a very strong army that conquered many rivaling nations before, during, and after the time frame around that of the European Crusades. Lastly, the Turks were the only people who built the Ottoman empire, and influenced the long lasting rule that it had over the course on hundreds and thousands of years.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ancient world, religious tolerance was mainly in the context of imperial states using it as a political or strategic tactic to hold power within an imperial state ; or as part of religious teachings that forbade the forced conversions of others. In modern times, many sovereign Western countries,including the U.S, have implemented religious tolerance with the aim of multiculturalism and have even codified it. In the Persian context, it was used as a political strategy to help advance his conquests by giving an image of tolerance and vibrancy. In the Ottoman context, forced conversions weren’t practiced because the Quran forbid it. By contrast, the U.S and many other sovereign Western countries have codified this policy for the goal of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.The Ottoman Empire was the Islamic world’s most important empire in the early modern period…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ottoman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The golden age definitely had an impact on the women of the empire as well. “Women did not have as much access to public power as men. However, women in elite households, especially the sultan’s household, could be extremely powerful political actors. In addition, women could hold property, conduct business, and defend their interests in Islamic courts” (Harvard University Center for Middle Eastern Studies, The Outreach Center). The power that women acquired in the golden age made them not close to power as men, but equal. Women didn’t have that much power, to begin with, but wherever they did, they became really powerful. So the Ottomans didn’t have any discrimination towards women or anyone for that matter. The Ottoman Empire tolerated much of the minorities, although there was some social discrimination. For example, when the Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492, many were welcomed and resettled in the Ottoman Empire. “The Empire’s subjects came from many different ethnic and religious groups. Non-Muslim religious groups were called millets and had a certain amount of internal autonomy in regulating their own economic, social, and legal affairs” (Harvard University Center for Middle Eastern Studies, The Outreach Center). They accept anyone and everyone and any religion. Meaning, they don't convert others nor force them to follow what they…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Selami says “the Ottoman Empire always gravitated towards progress and one of the reasons for the Ottoman Empire’s success was that it never considered going back to Central Asia thanks to the philosophy that came from the Huns and the Seljuks. The Ottoman Empire was a European state, especially in the eyes of Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror. The Empire gravitated not toward Asia but Europe.” Shown by their early and effective use of firearms. The Ottomans proved willing and able to borrow ideas. The early Ottoman enterprise was not a religious state in the making, it was primarily a pragmatic one. Because of this the Ottoman Empire was able to last longer than any of the empires surrounding them. The legacy of the Ottoman Empire can be seen today through institutional change, modernity and nationalism are all things that have contributed to what the Middle East is today. The Ottoman Empire is one of the largest and longest lived empires of the Middle East. The Ottoman Empire survived for more than four centuries until it was finally dismantled at the end of World War I in 1918. The Ottoman Empire provides us with a direct link from the early modern period through the modern…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It wasn’t until the nineteenth century that the conditions between the Armenians and Muslims population worsen that made the Ottoman officials in a bind. The Muslims were resentful that the Armenian community was flourishing in culture and economics whiled the Ottoman Empire was experiencing trouble. Armenian leaders wanted more fairer treatments and autonomy within the empire caused the tensions between Muslim and Armenians to rise even further.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottoman Empire’s military consisted of Horse Soldiers and Foot Soldiers or Janissaries. Their military was very powerful. Janissaries consisted of male Christian prisoners of the war that were trained and taught how to become military slaves. Since they didn’t have personal ties to people in the Ottoman Empire, they were allowed to be completely invested in protecting the Sultan. The cavalry was supported by some land grants and would stay in order, collect taxes and campaign. The Ottoman Empire was led by the Conqueror Sultan Mehmed II. In 1453, the Constantinople was taken down as one of the largest and most powerful cities. As the Constantinople was taken down, this made the Ottoman Empire seem invincible. After the Ottoman Empire gained all control of the Constantinople, the Sultan then converted all of the Christian churches into Islamic Mosque. This then declared that Islam was going to be the main religion. Even though Islam was the main religion, there were still some religions practiced in the city even after the Ottoman Empire took…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ottoman rulers, like most of their subjects, were Muslim. Christians had to pay higher taxes than Muslims, for example, and they had very few political and legal rights. In spite of these obstacles, the Armenian community thrived under Ottoman rule. They tended to be better educated and wealthier than their Turkish neighbors. In 1908, a new government came to power in Turkey. A group of reformers who called themselves the “Young Turks” overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid and established a more modern constitutional government. At first, the Armenians were hopeful that they would have an equal place in this new state, but they soon learned that what the nationalistic Young Turks wanted most of all was to “Turkify” the empire. According to this way of thinking, non-Turks–and especially Christian non-Turks–were a grave threat to the new…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ottoman Empire

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The inscription of Suleyman reveals that the Ottoman Empire was a Muslim community. However, not only did this inscription inform readers that religion was existent within this empire during this period of time, but it also reveals a clear distinction of social status amongst this community. It is evident that Suleyman was a rather significant figure within society due to the fact that he is described within the inscription as the 'head of Muhammad's community.' (Stearns, Peter N., Stephen S. Gosch, and Erwin P. Grieshaber., 2003, pp.60) The source provides an outlook on the society at this period in time.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The empire began to disintegrate as the Ottomans lost battle after battle, and the Serbs, Romanians, and Greeks gained their independence. The Arabs in the Middle East and Armenians were all that remained in the Ottoman Empire under the rule of Sultan Abdul Hamid. Since the empire was in decline, young Armenian people gradually began to demand political reforms, a constitutional government, and an end to discriminatory taxes directed at Armenians because of their Christian beliefs. The Sultan ignored their pleas and the young Armenians were persecuted. Years later, an organization called the Young Turks eventually altered the future of the Armenian people because of their vicious acts against them in the form of a genocide.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many would argue that a tolerant society involves the state being a neutral umpire. This is the idea of a neutral based liberalism and it states that we should not supress, or promote any particular way of life. This is because of the reason for being tolerant in their opinion is because we are fallible humans who will never know the truth and also because moral truth is subjective. First of all there are always going to be different opinions of what is moral truth and different meathods which people use to find it because moral truth can not be proved using empiricm. It is different to proving things like science, we can not use empirical evidence to discover moral truth and therefore there are always going to be disagreements on it. We as humans are fallible, and one way in which we are fallible is that we sometimes think and believe that we are definitely right when in fact we are wrong. This therefore must apply to moral truth. Because we all as humans are imperfect this means that when we believ ourselves to be right about something we could easily be mistaken and infact be wrong. States and majorities, who have the power, are also made up of fallible humans. If a state promoted a particular way of life, it is insinuating that it knows this way of life to be better, it is assuming its own infallibility, because by promoting this particular way of life it is saying that this is the right way to live. As the state is made up fallible humans this could very easily be wrong because we are imperfect and therefore could be mistaken. Therefore it means that this isn’t necessarily the right way to live and that another way which is infact the right way to live is overlooked by so many people because the state is promoting the way in which they believe is best even though they are wrong. Basically by promoting a certain way of life above others, the state is first…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics