Preview

The Perils Of Indifference Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
772 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Perils Of Indifference Summary
Indifference is unnatural; Indifference is a blurred line between light and dark; Indifference is seductive; Indifference is the end of man. Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” argues that indifference is more dangerous than anger and hatred. He supports his claim by first illustrating the “failures that have cast a dark shadow over humanity” and talks about dreadful characteristics of indifference and what it does to us; then he talks about how indifference is “not a beginning, it is an end” and how mankind has made so many mistakes. Finally, Wiesel hopes that we can improve upon ourselves and “walk towards the new millennium, carried by profound fear and extraordinary hope.”
Wiesel’s purpose is to define indifference so that we are aware of it’s effects so that we can do something about it in order to bring about change to the world and society. He adopts a bitter, critical, and hopeful tone for politicians, ambassadors, members of Congress, lawmakers, and the president. The general
…show more content…
The Jewish units in eastern Europe fought Germans in city ghettos and did not start until 1943. Eastern Resistance units emerged in over 100 ghettos several countries, including Poland, Lithuania, Belorussia, and the Ukraine. In western Europe, in France, a French Jewish partisan group was founded in Toulouse around January 1942. They smuggled money from Switzerland and brought it into France to assist Jews in hiding and smuggled at least 500 Jews into neutral Spain, and took part in the 1944 uprisings against the Germans in Paris. Wiesel talks about how indifference has “its courses and inescapable consequences” and whether it is a philosophy or not. These two groups are both examples of a philosophical group that stood up to the oppressors for the better

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If you were ever put in a “survival of the fittest” situation, would you ever get to a point where nothing matters? Eliezer Wiesel’s book describes this situation perfectly. People who conveyed Jewish religion were exhibited inhumane treatment. They were tortured and beaten every day until they couldn’t take it anymore. The overall theme that was faintly suggested throughout the book is to show men’s harshness to one another in a life or death situation.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elie Wiesel’s Night, Martin Niemöller’s poem, First They Came for the Communists and Eve Bunting’s, The Terrible Things, all share the same theme with one another. The theme of these passages is that no one stood up for individuals, mostly in times where it was crucial. By not doing something to help, it created great despair and sorrow. Those who didn’t receive help were confused as to why nobody would do something to assist them, especially in time of need. Those who didn’t help assumed the best and made excuses as to why the people taken deserved to go.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does it support Wiesel's main ideas about indifference? I think he used it in a metaphorical way, since in that war he also saw people who were good, but it was not always an option for them to do the right thing. 6. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? When he speaks of his time in the camps hoping for rescue, Wiesel writes, "If they knew, we thought, surely those leaders would have moved heaven and earth to intervene.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    original state, or “re­humanized”. Through my eyes, Elie Wiesel has made it apparent that this…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile, according to “Sudan Backgrounder,” “With the international community focused on resolving the conflicts between the north and the south, a growing conflict in Darfur was virtually ignored.” Evidently, the conflict in Darfur is ignored allowing the violence to grow in the area. The point Wiesel made is clearly supported by the events occurring in the world. Even after he delivers his speech, indifference continually grows. The indifference of the Sudan President causes chaos in Darfur---the attacks, the deaths, the danger existent in Darfur is because of the cruelty the president has.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During world war II, the people known as, Jews, were targeted for deportation to concentration camps and execution. The term, “Inhumanity” was expressed in many different ways during this period of time. Inhumanity can scar people emotionally and mentally. Inhumane people tend to act very cruel towards other people, animals, and the environment. In the story, “Night” by Elie Wiesel, there were many merciless examples of how inhumanity was shown during World War II.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his arousing Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech in 1986, Elie Wiesel pronounces the importance of “taking sides” and “interfering” when a time of human suffering is upon the world. He is undeniably correct. People need to stand up for what is right in this world, and acknowledge the wrong; they need to take an issue of human persecution and make it “the center of the universe”.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After that, they would continue the poisonous gas treatment to other people. If you were one that would have to work you would be fed very small amounts of food and have to work and live in some very horrible conditions that are fit for no humans to live in. The speaker had to go through this so he knows what it feels like to be treated like that and felt abandoned. Elie Wiesel's speech “The Perils of Indifference,” uses pathos and logos to warn the President, Congress and the bystanders about all the pain and suffering that occurred during the Holocaust. First and foremost Elie Wiesel gave a speech about the Holocaust which was titled “The Perils of Indifference.”…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dangers of indifference come like an unexpected flood. Elie and Niemoller recognize the impact of silence and have experienced it themselves. For the poet, he chose to not speak out and as a consequence, no one was there to save him. He set himself up for destruction. Wiesel says, “ Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” because so many people did not speak up and it resulted in a mass murder. If people had not been silent, the Holocaust and many other genocides may have been avoided and innocent lives saved.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (The Perils of Indifference, 67) According to Wiesel, he clarifies that although the bystanders did not kill…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearing the end of World War II, a young Wiesel, among many others, was rescued from the concentration camp in Auschwitz and was finally free from the grasp of the wicked Nazis. After his freedom, Wiesel did all he could through his literary works to let the world know of the horrors he experienced at the hands of the Nazis. He received a Nobel Peace prize for his messages to the world. In 1999, he gave a very prominent speech about oppressors and the indifference of Man, apathetic to the suffering of the holocaust victims.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You denounce it. You disarm it,” by repeating the first word to each sentence helps demonstrate the idea that indifference cannot operate by itself; only a person's authority can let the consequences of indifference influence humanity. At this point, Wiesel’s critical tone focuses on playing with the audience’s emotion to allow other who are have not yet grasp the reaction indifference towards humanity. Nevertheless, indifference has been repeated multiple times as he uses this technique to conclude that indifference gives no effect, “Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy… Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment.” This is another key point to help wrap up the perception of Indifference. The section is developed around the topic of indifference. Wiesel’s comparisons and choice of structure help support his claim of how much destruction indifference can cause, provides different perspectives for those in front of him and increase the intensity of his tone as he approaches the climax of the…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wiesel does not understand the reasoning of suppling Hitler while World War II was going on. Ford, DuPont, GM, Standard Oil, Bank of America all had massive investments in Germany. None of them cared about slave labour or anything else. How could they accept the fact in some shape or form they are helping Hitler fight the war against America and also help kill the jews who are suffering. Back in the day people only cared about their own country and wealth, not others. America went along with doing business because they were greedy for money. Why stop making millions from Hitler when its not affecting you? That how I look at it from the…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The chilling screams and cries of 30 million women and children in sex trafficking. The silent agony of 30 million girls in China never to be heard or thought of. The horrors of 30,000 Darfuri men, women, and children slaughtered in Western Sudan. These are all current events. Sex Trafficking. Missing girls. Genocide. Horrific things that if they hit anywhere near close to home people would be doing everything in their power to end them, yet they are still all happening today because it might not be personal for someone. After something as infamous as Hitler’s holocaust it would be logical to assume that every person would feel a natural duty as a human to help end innocent people's suffering. Elie Wiesel was right to state that “human suffering…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wiesel's speech analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To achieve a warm reception, he assessed his audience and appropriately referenced the current German Chancellor’s civic contribution and President Obama’s earlier speech on humanity. (Beebe text, p. 43) He challenged the world’s claim of learning from the historical atrocity by calling to the victims of Rwanda, Darfur, and Bosnia selecting the best supporting material suitably concrete and of enough magnitude. (Beebe, pp. 97, 118) Wiesel spoke with the right intonation of measurable staccato in addition to pausing between good volume to emphasis his dissatisfaction and portrayal of the yet ill-condition of humanity. In perfect pitch, he asked, “Will the world ever learn?” (Beebe, p. 190)…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays