In an attempt to legitimise public relations as a management function scholars…. Have labeled persuasion as an unethical practice within public relations.
Do you agree? Why or why not?
Persuasion is a key point of communication and plays a fundamental role in our everyday life. Be it at work, in social surrounding or even between ourselves, we are continuously persuading ideas and information, is not only used to convey information within or beyond an organisation, but also seeks to influence people. In this essay I will cover why I believe persuasion is not an unethical practice within PR (public relations) and why PR practitioners must follow strict codes of ethics to assure their organisation is not scrutinised.
Every organisation has to follow a code of ethics and the same goes for Public Relation firms. Academic scholars have noted that the term “persuasion” is often avoided in debates with PR professionals most likely because of the link it has with propaganda. Whereas other scholars argue that persuasion and PR are “two peas in a pod” and “essential function of contemporary public relations” (Smith B., 2008, p. 4)
It is well known that PR has been arguably recognised as the “spin doctors” for years in they way they persuade the public, which has brought a lot of negativity, so much so that many people actually perceive it to be full of propaganda, which in fact they are very different. However where does it draw the line when ethics are involved? PR is described as the management function that establishes and maintains mutually beneficial relationships between an organisation and the publics on whom its success or failure depends (T. Watson, 2007, p. 5), this is done by evaluating the publics attitudes, identifies policies and procedures of an individual or an organisations with the public interest, and plans and executes a program of action to earn public understanding and acceptance. ‘Persuasion’ I feel is a strong word;