The Prince And Humanism Analysis

Define Humanism, and write a paper explaining how “The Prince” represents a humanist approach to the art of governing, in contrast to the idea of government based on divine authority and Catholic dogma. Humanism is the liberal viewpoints that are based on rational philosophy in the dignity of human beings; affirming their ability and responsibility in leading moral lives of personal gratification that seeks the greater good of humanity. Although humanism has various meanings, each constitutes a different type of humanism: Literary is devoted to the humanities of the literary culture; Renaissance is a spirit of learning that was developed at the end of the middle ages; Cultural is the rational and empirical tradition that originated in Greece
However, humanist beliefs are, individuals must grow into maturity—intellectually and morally—through their own participation in the life of the state. This prospect of humanism is a way of living and thinking that aims to reveal the best in a person’s life. Humanist rejects all supernatural authoritarian beliefs, and accepts as true what a person must take responsibility for in their lives, community, and the world. The humanist life stance emphasizes rational and scientific inquiry, individual freedom, responsibility, and the need for tolerance and cooperation. Although Machiavelli presents a humanist perspective in “The Prince” an approach that emphasizes empathy and accentuates the good in humans, his beliefs are people has much to offer to the well-being of the state. He also illustrates how blemishes of strength and deception may be necessities in many forms of government, as well as the possibility of success and accomplishments by the party that’s in
This assumption was formulated in ancient Judaism, which saw the establishment of regal authority as a manifestation of the wisdom which God ordered. Both the Church and State have the good of a man as their end. The church concerns itself with man’s ultimate good, whereas the State is concerned with his temporal good. But within the pagan antiquity, there are no real distinctions between religion and state. All religions were categorized by nations, tribe, city, and cult. The cults of the gods were adjoined with the cult of the state. Christians were the first to introduce a distinction between the sacerdotalism and the regnum. However, during the latter Roman Empire, the church had to strive to remain independent of the attempts of the rulers to dominate. (Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica) Nevertheless, man’s temporal good is the freedom to pursue his eternal good unhindered. Although Christian revelation did not do away with the fundamental concept of the divine origin of government, it made several important distinctions. The government, though it derives its authority from God, is distinct from the Church. Both the state and church are related, but with distinct endings. With the church, even man’s temporal actions must be directed towards his eternal end. The act of government