At time she included so much information, and made sure to source everything, and at other times the author states things and fails to prove that the information she provides us are facts. sometimes includes unnecessary informations with great details, such as how some may spell Elizabeth Wydville’s last name differently, and how it is written on her gravestone. At other times I felt that the author purposely left some facts out to make her argument undoubtable. Such event happens when Weir talks about Richard III’s reputation while he ruled in the North(1472-83), Weir spends a whole paragraph stressing how the people of City of York were favourable of Duke of Gloucester, later Richard III. She then suddenly claims that they feared
At time she included so much information, and made sure to source everything, and at other times the author states things and fails to prove that the information she provides us are facts. sometimes includes unnecessary informations with great details, such as how some may spell Elizabeth Wydville’s last name differently, and how it is written on her gravestone. At other times I felt that the author purposely left some facts out to make her argument undoubtable. Such event happens when Weir talks about Richard III’s reputation while he ruled in the North(1472-83), Weir spends a whole paragraph stressing how the people of City of York were favourable of Duke of Gloucester, later Richard III. She then suddenly claims that they feared