Preview

How Did Edward Vii Cause A Political Crisis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
894 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Edward Vii Cause A Political Crisis
Explain why the death of Edward IV caused a political crisis in England 1483.
Edward IV, king of England, died suddenly and prematurely without an obvious cause in April 1483 aged only 40 years. Edward IV had been a strong king after 1471, and very much able to control the rival factions between the Yorks & the Lancaster’s, but his death opened up a Yorkist family feud. After the sudden kings death the throne should have passed smoothly to his son of Elizabeth Woodville; Edward V, who was aged twelve at the time. Edward V could rule with the help of a selected protector and council but things never work out to be simple. Edward IV’s death caused a political crisis in England for a number of reasons.
One of the first reasons was that both
…show more content…
Richard feared that once Edward was crowned, the Woodville’s would dominate power. Richard (Duke of Gloucester) decided to seize his nephew Edward V. He also arrested Elizabeth's brother, Anthony, Earl of Rivers, and Sir Richard Grey, her son by her first marriage who were both were executed in June 1483, whiping the Woodville family of their power as quickly as he possibly could. Slowly the Woodville family was loosing their newfound power more and more, which had started to raise suspicions. Elizabeth decided enough was enough and took sanctuary with Richard, Duke of York (Edward IV's youngest son) in Westminster Abbey, but he was soon extracted by Richard Duke of Gloucester and joined his brother to remain hidden in the Tower. With the boys now hidden away and Richard Duke of Gloucester claiming that he was the legitimate heir to the throne, he was made Richard III the new King of England on 6th July 1483. He finally had his way and the power he believed that he rightfully deserved. Although, the two princes in the Tower were never seen publicly again. Two skeletons discovered in the Tower in 1674, and examined in 1933, are thought to have possibly been those of Edward V and Richard, but it is not certain. However, the most probable explanation of their disappearance is that Richard III ordered them to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry the VII becomes King of England. Henrys mother Margaret was a decendant of Edward III. This gave Henry a claim to the throne. He sequered his crown by dividing and undermining the power of nobility. obilityHenry was eventually crowned as king on August 22nd 1485. He continued to rulke from ruled from August 1485 to April 1509.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP EURO SEMESTER FINAL REVIEW

    • 13928 Words
    • 37 Pages

    5) Henry VII of England: King of England from August 22, 1485 to April 21, 1509. After the War of Roses, restored political stability in England…

    • 13928 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why was Edward IV able to defeat challenges to his rule in 1470-71, but Richard III was unable to do so in 1485?…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward IV restored some elements of royal authority in the years 1471 – 1483, he had destroyed his opposition or forced them into exile, he used family member to control more volatile regions and took a keen interest in law and order. In addition he improved the English economy and made a somewhat successful invasion of France. Although some would argue that Edward failed at restoring Royal authority because his heirs were only young at his time of death, Nobel rivalry thought England and his foreign policy had begun to go wrong.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rebellions which occurred during the reigns of Edward vi and mary 1st were mainly political in origin?…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    then came Edward IV who was a strong king that sorted out the mess that Henry VI had left behind.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THERE A "MID TUDOR CRISIS" DURING THE REIGNS OF EDWARD VI AND MARY I? "The mid-Tudor crisis" is a term often used by historians to describe the reigns of Edward VI (1547-1553) and Mary I (1553-1558). This period can be seen as a crisis, due to the fact that there were so many problems financially, socially, religiously and constitutionally, which led to rebellions, and placed the country in a very unstable position.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mid Tudor Crisis Essay

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There has been some debate as to whether it is true to say that during the reigns of the ‘mid-Tudor’ monarchs there was a crisis. For both Edward and Mary there were various factors that did pose problematic for them such as the threats to the Tudor dynasty through rebellions and neither having a strong heir to the throne after their deaths. Moreover, there were also factors such as finance and foreign policy that also made the crown slightly unstable as inflation continued to rise and England lost possession over French towns. However, although there is evidence to show that there was a mid-Tudor crisis, the stronger argument is that there was, in fact no crisis but a time where…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December 1483 the bodies of Prince Richard and Prince Henry, only 12 and 9, were found murdered in the Tower of London. The mystery of who killed the boys is still a mystery to this day, however many suspect their uncle Richard III of York. Many historians who recorded the event explicitly express that they’re certain Richard III is responsible, and there’s many valid reasons to support their assumption.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fling

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once Richard took the throne he was known as Richard III. He was the great-great-grandson of Edward III and the uncle of the previous king Edward V. It was rumoured that he caused the death of the princes in the tower. Although it was never proven he had a motive to do it because he wanted the throne for himself. To help himself get there he also started a rumour that Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville’s marriage was illegitimate because Edward had already been set to marry someone before Elizabeth. People believed what they heard which meant they believed that Edward V was also illegitimate to have the throne, and so shortly after Richard was made king. During his reign the Buckingham Rebellion took place. Henry Stafford, The Duke of Buckingham, was once a loyal supporter of Richard but switched sides to bring Richard down. This caused Richard to build a huge army, but it wasn’t particularly strong. The rebellion failed leaving Richard still on the throne; however it left a…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rebellions which occurred during the reign of Edward VI were mainly religious and not political in origin. The political reasons for the rebellions are that there were absent landlords, mainly because they were in the council, which meant the peasants had no-one to stop them and the incompetent advisors, Peter Carew, sent down to deal with the issue. The religious reasons were that the reforms of Somerset had not gone far enough and the majority of the clergy were uneducated and the common prayer book was produced. The economic reasons for the rebellions were that illegal enclosures were being torn down by government commissions, but the peasants wanted to take matters into their own hands and the sheep tax was hitting the poor harder than it should’ve done.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays