When it is a chance to invest, the owner must want to have the latest technology to support your business, special for the production enterprise. Technical innovations are needed, but they also have to be proven in the industry. Most of companies pay attention to technical innovations and advanced equipments.
Since the 80th of 20 century, the development of computer technology, sensor technology, frequency conversion technology bring huge change for the automation of every industry, which may enhance the productivity and product standardization. The quick development of automation changes the world industry and enterprise’s management and operation. Just so, numbers of enterprises one after another invest kinds of automation device to enhance their productivity and efficiency. Because advanced technology may provide higher productivity, better product quality, and stronger competitiveness so as to change enterprise’s destiny and delight future. It is out of question that the introduction of automation quickens the improvement economy and society not only to enhance productivity. In a word, automation is welcome by almost enterprise(R Burrows, 1998). Bloomintex, as a medium sized chemical production manufacture, also chosen to buy some new advanced machines in order to keep up with other industries. Prior to any investment, careful consideration and risk analysis are made. Recovery boiler experts at Stora Enso know exactly what to assess and follow. The availability of automation plays a core role when securing the process in the recovery boiler. Unnecessary shutdowns are to be prevented. Effective leadership is a personal role that requires the blending of motivational, strategic and management skills to align focus, energy and drive whilst creating a culture that encourages individual thinking and attainment. Ultimately leadership is about pushing ideas and thoughts forwards, shouldering responsibility and unlocking hidden drivers and
References: [1]R Burrows, 1998,Self-Employment and Home Ownership after the Enterprise Culture - Work Employment, New Delhi: Wiley Eastern,p12. [2]M Peters,2001,enterprise culture and the entrepreneurial self: a Foucauldian perspective,Journal of Educational Enquiry, P25. [3]Hall, E.G. and Hall, 1990, understanding cultural differences. Doubleday, New York, Pearson Education First Impression,P49. [4]Bass, 2008,The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press, Pearson Education First Impression,P59. [5]Keltner,D., Gruenfeld, D.H., and Anderson, C,2003, Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, P110. [6]DeChurch, L.A., 2010, Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact. The leadership quarterly,P21. [7]Mayer, D.M., 2009,How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Process, P108. [8]Tangirala, S,2007,In the shadow of the boss’s boss: Effects of supervisors’ upward exchange relationships on employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, P92. [9] Smith, K.G.,,2008, Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, P39. [10]Overbeck, J.R.,(2006, Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, P99.