Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Factions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Factions
The Founders designed the government the way they did in order to allow for the greatest amount of liberty but still maintaining order and the ability for the government to grow and prosper. The bicameral system allows citizens to feel more secure about their government because it reduces the risk of all the governmental power being in the hands of a single, or few, leader(s). This system grants liberty to citizens that cannot be taken away at the whim of a single leader.
Factions are small groups divided from the population. Factions generally have their own set of interests that benefit themselves, but may have negative or neutral effects on the rest of the population. Some factions are part of a majority, while other factions may be a minority. A dangerous result of factions is that the majority, or a faction with power, may be given benefits that minority factions don't receive. Factions can also be dangerous because they disunite a nation. As proved during Founding Fathers' time, it is very easy for a nation to become divided. America has experienced division between densely populated states such as Virginia and less populated states such as New Jersey. It has
…show more content…
The first option goes against the beliefs of our nation and as Madison says, "It could never be more truly said than of the first remedy, it was worse than the disease." The second option is nearly impossible. Therefore, the Founding Fathers implemented different methods to keep the factions from effecting the government and its policies. The representatives are elected directly to allow for representation of every citizen. The terms for the congress seats are for a short period of time; in the House of Representatives the term is two years and in the Senate the term is 6 years but with new elections for 1/3 of the Senate every two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 2 of Our Undemocratic Constitution, Sanford Levinson analyzes the Constitution, focusing on the legislative branch of government and the ways in which it enforces ideas and powers presented in Article I. Strong bicameralism is a system within the United States government that allows for two legislative chambers (the House of Representatives & the Senate) to come to a compromise upon proposed legislation. These groups are granted separate but equal powers and in the United States are unusually strong, in that they have appointed members meant to serve in the favor of the national majority which do not, according to Levinson, “prevail against the opposition of one another” (Levinson, p. 30). Bicameralism, in general, causes the number…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the first Federalist paper, No. 10 written by James Madison, is an informative piece of writing warning us against the dangers of having such a strong, powerful government and what ways that we can break away from the “Violent Factions”. (Paragraph 1, Line 3.) As Madison goes on, he goes into great detail on the two ways of defeating the creation of factions. One would be to get rid of liberty and freedom all together, which is impossible to complete. The second way to get ride of the factions would be “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” (Paragraph 4, line 2.) Both of those methods are equally unwise as it is impossible to complete. As it is hardwired into…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, factions were caused by a few things. The first was the unequal distribution of property/wealth. Something else that caused factions was the fact that small groups were only for local issues/passions. Too many factions in a political party were dangerous, as each group believed a variety of different things. With many factions holding various opinions, this meant that no political party would have definite control of the government. This meant that the larger the faction, the more it could use its larger values and beliefs on others; merely because there are more people in a larger faction. Madison was against a majority rule. This is why Madison came to the conclusion that…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison goes onto say two things, that you can either control the source of factions or the source of factions, and in order to do either of these things you need a republic to control these effects.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    o Factions, such as political parties, do not keep the public interest in mind and if not eliminated, will try to take control of the government.  Madison describes a faction as a number of citizens who share a similar view or interest, different of that of the other citizens and/or community. • There are 2 ways to remove factions: by destroying the liberty or by giving every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. o Liberty is essential to the foundation of our country and political life.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Madison’s The Federalist, No.10, he argues that factions are harmful, therefore a large republic must be created in order to keep it from becoming a faction.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Federalist 10

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He writes that because of this issue, groups or faculties, rather than promoting common goals, choose to oppress the minor groups. The influence of power, adison writes plays a key role in faction. The more powerful groups are, the more influence they have within government, the more influence that they have, the further the interest of the public gets from the actual decisions made. Madison believes that we cannot completely remove a factions but he has provided methods to control factions. A few reasons why we cannot completely remove factions is that, It is not possible to eliminate the freedom that allows for expression and differing opinions, It is not possible to make every person in society have the same opinions, and lastly factions generally come from a concern for property, it is one of the duties of government to protect property.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution intended to create a new self-controlling central government of the United States. The country’s power was divided into three branches: legislative, executive and judiciary, and the strongest legislative branch was further divided into two houses: House of Representatives and Senate. This allowed them to check and balance each other, thus prevented the centralization of power in one branch. Therefore, by creating a government structure where no single group of people could seize absolute power, the state’s power over people and especially minorities was restrained. Under the Legislative branch, the House of Representatives “shall be composed of Members chosen every second year by the People of the several States” (Article…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today the United States uses a process called single member representation. This has been the process the United States has been using since the United States was first established. This had been very effective until now. The reality is that this is greatly underrepresentation of the smaller parties. Proportional Representation is a better system in a number of ways; there would be less issues with gerrymandering, there would be a rise in the number of voters, there would be much better representation, and there would be more sexual equality in Congress.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison states, "The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man," (Madison, Paragraph 5) so the solution is to control their effects. He makes an argument on how this is not feasible in a moral democracy but practical in a republic. Effects of a faction vary depending on whether the faction is a majority or minority faction. Madison argues that the only strenuous effects to control will come from majority factions. He states that the concept of popular sovereignty should keep minority factions from acquiring an influence. “But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society” (Madison, Paragraph 5). However he argues that undesirable passions can spread from a small size to a majority faction fairly quickly. “. The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of the government” (Madison, Paragraph…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists response was that a heterogeneous republic will be better at protecting liberty rather than a small homogeneous republic. They also argued that only a large republic can prevent majority tyranny. Majority tyranny is prevented by increasing the number of interests (factions) in society. (Ginseberg, Lowi, and Weir 63.) They also believed in constructing institutions with teeth in them. This is called separation of powers and federalism.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Madison’s, The 10th Federalist, Madison believes that in a nation a larger republic is safer and more efficient than that of a smaller republic. James Madison answers the question of how to eliminate the negative effects of faction. He defines a faction as, “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a minority or majority of the whole, who are untied and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” Madison believes the most serious source of faction is the diversity of opinion in political life, which leads to dispute over fundamental issues such as what system of government or religion should be preferred. Madison states that, “A pure democracy can admit no…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factions can benefits the government or it can destroys it depend on how one’s country deal with it. When factions are controlled and use it in the right path than it can surely make the government strong and grow. Republican and Democratic has been controlled by the Check and Balance therefore even if problems arise they can always deals and move forward, but sometimes they also has to take longer to deal than usual. In 2013 there was government shutdown which “nearly 800,000 federal employees were out of work without pay.” However, the Republican and Democratic came to an agreement so the government weren’t even shut down for one month.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But on the contrary to what Centinel says, Madison creates a good government by controlling the effect of factions which are created by equality. Madison argues that “politicians have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality, they would at the same time be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions” (42). According to Madison, the greatest threat are factions and in order to cure them, Madison presents two ways: “Remove the causes by destroying liberty or control the effects by denying them the opportunity to act. In the first solution, it can be said that “the cure is worse than the disease”, while in the second one factions can be controlled by creating a large republic, this means a diversity of interests that would make it hard for factions to act” (39).…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Five factions: Abnegation, Amity, Candor, Dauntless, and Erudite. You are unwillingly born into one, but you get to choose whatever one for your new, permanent lifestyle. During your sixteenth year, you will take place in the Choosing Ceremony. However before, you will take an Aptitude test to find out what faction related the best to you. Abnegation is for the selfless, Amity is for the peaceful, Candor is for the honest, Dauntless is for the brave, and Erudite is for the intelligent. Some people do not fit into one of these categories, though. They will have personalities that go to more than one faction. These people are called Divergent, and head leaders want to get rid of them all. In whatever faction you choose, you will train until you get initiated. Throughout the book, Divergent, you will experience the life of Tris. You will go through her struggles, accomplishment, romantic life, loss, and gain. Then once you are done with the book, you are faced with the insurance of Tris and her family and friend’s future.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays