Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Minors

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Minors
Introduction
Today’s court system has many difficult decisions to make everyday. One of the most controversial decisions is whether or not try certain juveniles as adults or not. On one hand, being tried as a minor is considered unconstitutional, while on the other side it seems necessary in order to protect society. Some of the factors the court considers when convicting a minor is “age, physical and mental maturity, past attempts and future potential for rehabilitation, harm suffered by the victim, use of a firearm, and public safety” (“) Many minors who have been convicted came from unstable homes, lived in poverty, or have been physically abused. (“Children” 1). Factors such as these make it hard for people to decide if minors should be tried as adults. However, before making a decision, it is important to learn all
…show more content…

In most states, the eligibility age is at 16, but some states don’t have an age limit at all. There are many factors that may cause a minor to be tried as an adult such as: A lengthy juvenile record, being charged with a serious offense, such as homicide, or past rehabilitation efforts being unsuccessful. (“When” 1). Some argue that race and ethnicity have a big part of who does or does not get tried as an adult. A 2007 study found that minors who are black were about 10x as likely to be committed to adult facilities, despite the fact that half of those cases were related to “property, drug, or public order crimes, not serious violent offenses.” (“New” 1).

Conclusion
There are many different pros and cons for children being tried as adults depending on different morals, but by putting an end to juvenile crime before it even starts all of these problems with juveniles in the judicial system would be able to be avoided and society would be much safer and happier for


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historically, children have been regarded as constitutionally different from adults. This fact is evident in the way past cases have been decided. Certain juvenile characteristics such as their “ immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences” illustrates the clear discrepancy between children and adults. Furthermore, the majority contend that instances that call for punishment as severe as life imprisonment without parole will be exceedingly uncommon and rare. Requiring that all juvenile convicted of homicide are sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole regardless of age or other mitigating factors violates the principle of proportionality.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent V America

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should teens be tried as adults? Furthermore, would it stop teens from committing a crime if they were thrown in adult institutions? There are teens who commit crimes that could be judged as adults “On September 2, 1961, an intruder entered the apartment of a woman in the District of Columbia. He took her wallet. He raped her, the police found in the apartment latent finger prints. They matched the fingerprints of Morris Kent” (Kent). Morris is one of those teens. This intruder was a teen who was later tried as an adult. Due to the importance of trying teens as an adult, one must understand the background of the Kent v. United States case, know both sides and the impact the decision had on the future.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Semple, J. & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a subject that cannot be fairly judged on a case by case basis, and therefore needs a black and white answer. There are far too many instances where race and location decide whether or not someone is tried as an adult. Leaving the decision open for interpretation allows juveniles in better home situations to get off with less, while those less fortunate see their entire lives taken away from them. Until I hear a logical answer to the issue of selection and consistency, there is no fair way other than to see every juvenile, or no…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past years Juveniles have been fighting in court for being tried as adults. Many people agree or disagree on that decision, are they Juveniles, Children, or they adults? Writers like Adam Liptak, Marjie Lundstrom, Greg Krikorian, and Paul Thompson have maelstrom the ways of the mind of teenagers or consider their committed crimes to be adjured. The things that go through a teen’s brain are starting and unbearable to hear or imagine. Between the ages of 12 through 17, minors have been committing crimes that make their way down to death row. They look at juveniles on how unreliable and inconsistent they are on making bad decisions. But often minors bring unparticular brutally attracting impulsive claims on their behalf’s on their crimes.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults when they commit serious crimes, because the adult prison is too violent with juveniles not mature and fully mentally developed, and children in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I will look at current scholarly thought to determine the effectiveness of trying juveniles as adults in a court of law. In extreme instances, juveniles of a broad range of ages have committed violent crimes that the criminal justice system has determined to be impossible to have been committed by the accepted frame of mind of a juvenile. These juveniles were tried in adult court and sentenced accordingly. The purpose of my research is to examine juveniles who have been tried as adults and to discuss its strengths and weaknesses. I will analyze the information that I gather and will provide a strong case that this practice is appropriate. Many people believe that some crimes are so terrible that the courts should focus on the type of offense and not on the age of the accused.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If juvenile are tried one as an adult and then juveniles will be tried as an adult in all cases. In a few cases, such as a murder or rape, the assumption is that a juvenile should be tried as an adult unless the trial court rules that the case should be sent to juvenile court. Some states have laws that require a youth’s case to be tried in adult court these laws usually based this automatic transfer on the youth’s age, the seriousness or type of crime, and the juvenile’s prior record.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The only effective way to reduce and prevent juvenile crime is to balance tough enforcement measures with targeted, effective and intervention initiatives.” Juveniles are children and children don’t know any better and obviously make mistakes. They don’t expect to be caught after committing a serious crime. Juveniles brains are not fully developed until they are 25, but young people recognize them as adults at the age of 18. About 25,000 children a year have their cases sent to adult courts instead of being tried in juvenile courts, whose convicted defendants are usually set free by the time they turn 21. Trying juveniles as adults is not beneficial for them. But it also is a crime. And crimes are crimes whether…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile incarceration has created a lot of uncertainties in the legal justice system. This is because it is often assumed that indeed there are several persons that are underage that at the time of the crime did not have the proper mental reasoning to appreciate that indeed they were committing a crime. For this reason, there has been several problems regarding Juvenile incarceration and it has been argued that there is a need to re-evaluate and ensure that indeed the problems that affect the system are given the proper judicial involvement and justice. . This paper is going to examine how different it is from adults and juvenile when it comes to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining whether a juvenile is identified as a child or an adult is quite simple. If a juvenile is under the age of 18 then he or she is not an adult and if a juvenile has graduated from high school then he or she is identified as an adult. I believe that if a juvenile has not developed a certain level of intelligence or has not emotionally developed then they can’t be identified as an adult. In addition to that, although juveniles may have developed the sense of knowing right from wrong they may not know what’s right from wrong in the “adult world.” There have been laws passed to permitting juveniles to be transferred to adult court. The process with transferring juveniles to adult courts starts with the seriousness of the offense committed by the juvenile. If a juvenile has committed an offense such as armed robbery or murder then without a doubt there aren’t any excuses for…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contemporary society, there is a debate over whether a separate justice system should exist for juveniles and adults. While some juveniles have demonstrated the need for a separate justice system for juveniles, others have proven otherwise. There are separate justice systems for juvenile and adult offenders because of the belief that the mind of juveniles can be reformed unlike adult offenders. However, the juvenile justice system is similar to the adult justice system in many ways. In terms of the rights of the offenders, both juvenile and adult offenders have the right to an attorney, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, the right to protection against self-incrimination, the right to notice of charges, and prosecution needs proof beyond a reasonable doubt…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays