The Pros And Cons Of Poverty
If people with degrees, sat around and just debated or had conferences about winning the second war on poverty, would it even work? No one has come up with fundamentally new ideas just sticking with the myths of the past. Nothing is wrong with the past because it has made us how, who, what we are today ,but if it didn't work then it won't work now. There are many ways that people believe about how to get rid of poverty but aren't really the way. Scholars along with many people has come to a conclusion that poverty is immutable especially over the last decades. If we want to end the war on poverty, it should not be immutable. WIth poverty getting not worse nor better how is it supposed to end? Just because it fluctuates when recessions happen
to happen, but that doesn't drop the overall data. Plus if the government doesn't count the antipoverty work, it's like they have done no work. The next myth is about a competitive government. A way that they thought would end the war would be to have a European style market. “If we really want less poverty, the argument goes, we have no choice but to opt for European-style market regulations and taxes that have the unfortunate side effect of strangling productivity and reducing output.” “European Governments Redistribute income among their citizens on a much larger scale than does the U.S. government. European social programs are more generous and reach a larger share of citizens. European tax systems are more progressive. European regulations designed to protect the poor are more intrusive.” (http://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/423_0332-alesina11.pdf)
The third and fourth mind can the put together by full employment is too costly and that it's complicated. “The causes of poverty are hardly opaque. The main forces at work are simple and obvious: The economy isn’t delivering the jobs we need, and workers aren’t receiving the education they need.” The reasons are right there but trying to expands jobs matching education is hard. As my generation heads to higher education, when we get a degree will it be a waste? Ot every degree is guaranteed a job but will we get a job that can support at least ourselves?
to happen, but that doesn't drop the overall data. Plus if the government doesn't count the antipoverty work, it's like they have done no work. The next myth is about a competitive government. A way that they thought would end the war would be to have a European style market. “If we really want less poverty, the argument goes, we have no choice but to opt for European-style market regulations and taxes that have the unfortunate side effect of strangling productivity and reducing output.” “European Governments Redistribute income among their citizens on a much larger scale than does the U.S. government. European social programs are more generous and reach a larger share of citizens. European tax systems are more progressive. European regulations designed to protect the poor are more intrusive.” (http://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/423_0332-alesina11.pdf)
The third and fourth mind can the put together by full employment is too costly and that it's complicated. “The causes of poverty are hardly opaque. The main forces at work are simple and obvious: The economy isn’t delivering the jobs we need, and workers aren’t receiving the education they need.” The reasons are right there but trying to expands jobs matching education is hard. As my generation heads to higher education, when we get a degree will it be a waste? Ot every degree is guaranteed a job but will we get a job that can support at least ourselves?