The origin of this source is the publishing of Todd Brewster, an American author, journalist, and film producer. Todd Brewster published this book in 2014. The publishing date of this book suggests that there has been a considerable about of time between the Emancipation Proclamation and the present day. The purpose of this book is to speak to American citizens about the revolutionary implications of Lincoln’s decision and to shed light on the complexity of the situation. The content of this book includes the overall thought process of Lincoln and the criticism and judgments he received as a result of wanting to free slaves.…
The Emancipation Proclamation was sectionalized, did not free the slaves, and did not give blacks rights as citizens of the United States. For these reasons, the Emancipation Proclamation should be seen in the realm of everything as a good idea and a stepping stone to the actual emancipation of the African Americans by the thirteenth amendment; however, by itself, it should be seen as a bill of lading. The Emancipation Proclamation did not do enough in the effort to free the slaves; therefore, it should only be seen as a bill of lading, a “receipt” from the north stating that the southern slaves have been “sold their freedom”…
Jason I agree with you. Toward the end of 1862 early 1863, President Lincoln decided to issue the Emancipation Proclamation because his objective was to turn the focus from a political war to an morally based war. The Northerners started to protest the war because they were losing most of the battles. So President Lincoln was hoping by changing the focus of the war would gain the support of the North. Also, some European Countries were considering a formal acknowledgment with the Confederates. President Lincoln believed that the shift to a moral focus over the political focus on slavery would prevent this acknowledgment. Also, he hoped that freeing the slaves would bring the Southern slaves to support the North. Ultimately, President…
However, if he lost the election, which is what he was thinking, he knew the future president would remove the Emancipation Proclamation and protect slavery in the southern states. Lincoln’s intention was to preserve the nation. Secession was not an option. Despite all the criticism Lincoln was receiving, he stuck to his position.…
Lincoln’s primary goal was to “raise the flag back up” (Monaghan, 1945). Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation not only ended slavery, but also encouraged similar actions around the world. He added “that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States…henceforward shall be free…” (Teal, 2013). Immediately following the signing, Seward released the document to diplomats around the world.…
Lincoln could not enforce his promises at the time and wouldn't be able to unless the North experienced military success in battle. This meant the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t affect the status of slaves. Blacks that lived in the North already were free men before the Proclamation, as those states had outlawed slavery before, and slaves in the South couldn't be freed until the North won the war. Still, the proclamation did pave the way to remove slavery from our country.…
Well first, the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation declared that all slaves that were in the territory that was in rebellion against the government were free. And, of course, they didn’t free their slaves. But it did not apply to any of the Union’s territory. Slavery was officially abolished on December 18, 1865 when the 13th Amendment was added to the Constitution.…
Do you believe there were any advantages or disadvantages during this time for the Freedmen?…
Abraham Lincoln changed the United States when he declared the Emancipation Proclamation. The Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves oppressed in the South. This proclamation changed the United States for the better; it would eventually lead to equal rights for all men. In this proclamation, it states, “all persons held as slaves…shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free”…
The Emancipation Proclamation is a big turning point in the Civil War, as discussed in class. It not only entitled victory to the North, but became a small stepping stone for progress of racial equality. Although the Emancipation Proclamation was formed in sole effort to maintain the union by Abraham Lincoln, it was a bold move that led to progress in the abolition of slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation was extremely limited and did not end slavery in the politically divided country.…
Once again, to better understand the September release of the Emancipation Proclamation, one needs to go back a few months. The war was dragging on, heading deeper into its second year. Although the North had seen its fair share of victories, they suffered considerable losses during the Richmond campaign and considerable embarrassment in the 7 days battle. George Templeton Strong summed up the Northern moral in July 1862 stating they were, “permeated by disgust, saturated with gloomy thinking.”[1] Naturally, there was need of a scapegoat, someone to blame. The more finger-pointing that transpires within a legion than at the enemy, the more infighting emerges then out-fighting. The discussion among Lincoln’s cabinet of the subject began in Mid-July and went on for some time without resolve. Typical Lincoln was to let his strategy debate itself within the cabinet and declare a final decision, as he did on July 22nd.…
After hearing of Fremont’s proclamation to take the land and free the slaves of anyone who resisted the feral army, Lincoln stripped Fremont of his command. DiLorenzo on page 35 states that any attempt at emancipation from Lincoln was done solely for preserving the Union. On top of that, the famous emancipation proclamation did not actually have any effect. It failed to free a single slave. This is because the only states this proclamation applied to were revel states not federal states. DiLorenzo admits that the proclamation helped Lincoln gain power but that was about all it did. It appeased abolitionists…
The Emancipation Proclamation was a major decision on our leaders parts, the issue of slavery had long been discussed and argued over. To the point, that the South ceded from the United States to attempt to keep slavery and soon raised arms to protect the right to hold slaves. Soon after, the Union raised their defenses and the Civil War exploded into our nation. While the war, wore on the President finally came to a decision to present and issue the Emancipation Proclamation, which would allow slaves to be free men. However it has been noted that President Lincoln, though tried twice to issue this, had a separate goal of issuing it. The Confederates were groveling to get foreign nations to join the war on their side, and the President wanted…
Another reason for signing the Emancipation Proclamation, was to shift the war’s focus. Originally, the war was intended to keep Union together, and prevent the southern states from seceding. However, with the emancipation proclamation, the focus of the war shifted from that of a political stance, keeping the states together, to that of a moral stance, freeing slaves. This shift of focus garnered support from many individuals and also gave hope to slaves in the South.…
Lincoln was only concerned with protecting the Union not really ending slavery. In the reconstruction era the thirteenth amendment emancipated all the slaves in the United States. Many more amendments were…