Preview

The Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act
Beginning of the 19th century began with land-hungry american exploring the backcountry of the Coastal South and state of Alabama and Mississippi; However, since indian tribes occupied these lands, americans petitioned natives to be removed leading to the Indian Removal Act where authorized president, Andrew Jackson, signed a treaty to remove native tribes east of the Mississippi river and provide land west of the river. In difference, I believe this act wasn’t justified for several reasons; such as laws being disobeyed, natives being disrespected, and the Trail Of Tears The Indian removal act wasn’t justified because laws were disobeyed throughout the supreme court; for instance, Andrew Jackson negotiated with Native Americans to …show more content…
Another reason why the Indian removal act wasn’t justified considering Natives were disrespected entirely. For an example, Andrew Jackson treated native tribes such as the Cherokee as little toddlers and he was the father of all tribe stating, “They were children in need of guidance”(PBS), in addition, when Thomas Jefferson appointed Jackson his campaign against indians to collect Creek and Cherokee lands, he advised his troops to ambush native tribes and exterminate all women including children from …show more content…
The Cherokee tribes hated Andrew Jackson and his Tyrannical ways, they nicknamed him “Sharp knife” or “Old hickory” (Indian Country Today), considering the massive killings throughout history and the killer mentality he had; for instance, no illness or injury would stop Jackson from leading his troops into victory against his enemy no matter the circumstances. Lastly, the Indian Removal Act wasn't justified considering this event lead to the Trail of Tears. after the evacuation of native tribes from their lands, they began a thousand mile journey west of the Mississippi river through harsh climates, limited clothing, and barely enough food to survive; furthermore, more than 5,000 natives died of diseases including smallpox,malaria, and typhus; in addition, luckily, 200 natives survived the journey where they adapted to warm climates and non-profitable soil which also lead to many casualties due to starvation In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by the supreme court stating natives tribes must be removed east of the Mississippi river and relocated to the west; in difference, this law wasn't justified considering laws were being disobeyed, natives weren't treated fairly and was disrespected, finally, this event led to population decrease and eventually,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Jackson's reasons for the Indian Removal is that they were in the way of the white people's expansion and that most were starting to break the laws of the land. The Indians should not be removed because it was their land first and it is inhumane.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. It moved more than 100,000 Indians living east of the Mississippi to reservations west of the Mississippi. The five "civilized" tribes were hardest hit.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act called for the government to make treaties that required Native Americans to relocate west. Jackson thought that this policy was “just and liberal.” He thought the Native Americans would be able to keep their way of life. He was wrong. The Indian Removal Act brought a lot of hardship to the Native Americans. It also forever changed the relationship between whites and Native Americans. Before Jackson passed this act, he gave the Native Americans two choices. The two choices were that they could take on white culture and become citizens of the United States, or they could move to the Western territories and keep their…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act Dbq

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, the man representing the federal government as the President of the United States, actively pursued the Removal Act despite his previous opinion of Natives being so savage it were better to have them driven to extinction. (Wallace, 54) Later, he ruled that all Natives had been conquered and it was the U.S.’ responsibility to “save” these people by moving them away from their ancestral lands and West of the Mississippi. (Wallace,…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many opinions on Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was an act of cruelty or a fair policy, but the policy did not benefit Native Americans.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson’s presidency from 1829 to 1837 the decision to remove the Cherokee Indians to land west of the Mississippi River was made. This was more a change of the national policy rather than a reformulation of it. Since the Spanish came to the New World in the 1500’s, the Natives, were there. Starting with Washington’s administration in the 1790’s, the United States’ policy was to civilize the Natives and assimilate them into society. Under the administration of Andrew Jackson, who was in favor of Western speculation, the Natives were forced to move from their homeland.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act was put into place, Native Americans were forced to give up their land and migrate to the west and out of the east. It received lots of attention and strong support from non-natives who were eager to take control of the land.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not many of the citizens in the public seemed to care about how the Indians were treated and nothing was done to stop treating them poorly. The people did not try and get rid of the main person who leads it all, Andrew Jackson, they kept him in office and did not speak out against anything he did over his eight years in office. As most can see, the Indian Removal Acts were completely unconstitutional and were a very bad time in the years of America. The government was corrupt under “King Andrew” and it lead to many innocent deaths. This time is looked down on but can not be forgotten. The government America has today ensures that nothing like this could ever happen again.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ¨It is estimated that of the approximately 16,000 Cherokee who were removed between 1836 and 1839, about 4,000 perished.¨(Ellen Homes Pearson) ¨There was so much sickness among the emigrants,’ she recalled, ‘and a great many little children died of whooping cough.¨ (Rebecca Neugin/Ellen Homes Pearson) ¨Perhaps as many as 100,000 First t were pushed out of their traditional lands, and the death toll from these forced removals reached far into the thousands.¨(Ellen Homes Pearson) This evidence supports the claim that Indian Removal killed many Cherokee because it shows how about ¼ of the Cherokee died and that the amount of death has impacted and traumatized Cherokee since the Trail of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays